Saturday, February 09, 2008

God, I love typos

Of course, if it isn't a typo, I'll be changing my registration to 'Independent.'

From the Arizona Clean Elections Commission list of 2008 Participating Candidates (emphasis added)-

Office/District Last First Party

Senate 04 Harper Jack Dem

I just knew that there was a non-climatalogical reason that metro Phoenix was so cold on Monday (we even had a hail storm here in Scottsdale) -

Hell froze over!

LOL

Later!

Friday, February 08, 2008

Breaking news: 2008 Republican Campaign Platform Discovered

OK, OK, not really - this is just me being a wiseass... :)


For the first time in recent memory, they'll be running on an "us versus them" platform.

Well, for the first time since the last election, anyway.

They can't run on the economy - it's tanking, hard.

They can't run on fiscal responsibility - a run of record budget deficits sort of blocks that tactic.

They can't run on the war in Iraq - it's a quagmire (and John McCain's "we'll be there for a hundred years" doesn't really help them there.)

They can't run as the great protectors of liberty and the "American way" - the Patriot Act and FISA expansion (among other things) stop them there.

They can't run as the party of integrity - check out the list of Republicans facing investigation or indictment.

Education? The environment? You're kidding, right?

Nope, pretty much all that's left is that old reliable, demonizing an amorphous 'them', in this case, immigrants.


Just this week, Senate Republicans temporarily blocked an economic stimulus bill over concerns that some undocumented immigrants might receive rebate checks.

One question was left unanswered in their proclamations of heroic effort to protect the faltering U.S. economy from stimulation by anyone other than taxpayers who are in the U.S. legally -


How could an undocumented immigrant get on the list of intended recipients of rebate checks, other than by being on the list of taxpayers in the first place?


The fact that many, perhaps most, undocumented immigrants pay taxes is a fact that the nativists within and without Congress want Americans to ignore.

It's rhetorically inconvenient.

Congressional Republicans aren't reserving their anti-immigrant efforts to 'big' bills exclusively - they trot out their emnity for immigrants even on 'small' bills.

On HR4137, the College Opportunity and Affordability Act of 2007, Rep. Steve King (R-IA) proposed two (2!) amendments targeted at immigrants (here and here); no single-minded bigot he, Rep. King's third proposed amendment (here) targeted affirmative action.

Of course, it's not just Congressional Republicans - there are at least 15 anti-immigrant proposals before the Arizona legislature alone, and countless others across the county ('countless' because I don't have the patience to navigate the websites of 50 state legislatures trying to find the actual number. :) )

On the presidential campaign side, John McCain's biggest remaining obstacle in his quest for the Republican nomination is that the far-right wing of his party doesn't consider him to be conservative enough.

Never mind that he supports legislatively overriding Roe vs Wade, whole-heartedly supports Bush's Forever War, and supports continued tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans and large corporations.

Their problem with McCain is that he doesn't work up a strong enough hatred for immigrants.

Expect him to move to the right (a little bit, anyway) to appease them: more importantly, expect many of the down-ballot Rep candidates this year to make immigrant-bashing the main plank of their campaign platforms.

They have nothing else left to campaign on.

Nothing positive, anyway.

Well, Tim Bee's priorities are clear...

And LD30, CD8, and all of Arizona should note:


Serving the people who he was elected to represent *isn't* his first priority.


From the AZ Republic -

Senate leader is MIA; may be campaigning

It's turning into the legislative version of Where's Waldo: Where is Senate President Tim Bee?

The top official in the state Senate has been gone the past two days, prompting questions and quiet grumbling from fellow lawmakers that Bee is distracted by his congressional campaign.

Bee did not return a phone call seeking information about his Senate absences.

The story goes on to highlight how the members of the state senate are both supportive of Bee (stonewalling questions of his whereabouts) and restive over the Senate's lack of activity on many issues, not the least of which is the state's budget crisis.

Perhaps somebody should tell Senator Bee that maybe he should rethink the wisdom of seeking a promotion by abandoning his current job.
More on this story from the AZ Rep's Political Insider here.






Thursday, February 07, 2008

Here and there - elections notes

...The numbers are incomplete because not every county has posted early voting (EV) results on their websites (or, in Navajo County's case, the results are given in an almost unreadable format), but the pattern is clear - Hillary Clinton won in Arizona because of early votes.

In the five counties for which I could find clear data (Cochise, Maricopa, Pima, Yavapai, and Yuma), Clinton had a clear advantage in early votes over Barack Obama. In fact, her EV advantage in Maricopa County, 20,790, exceeded her total advantage in the county, 18,170.

Not sure what it means, other than that every campaign involved in the fall elections is paying attention.

...Early votes helped Clinton/hurt Obama in another way - John Edwards received over 21,000 votes, the vast majority of them early votes. Most of the Edwards supporters that I know switched their support to Obama when Edwards dropped out. Most of those that didn't were like me in that they couldn't switch because they had already voted.

Depending on where they came from, the 21,000 votes that Edwards received might have garnered Obama one or two more delegates. In a race this close, that might make the difference.

...Barack Obama won two counties (Coconino and Yavapai) and one Congressional District (CD5),

...Note that I haven't used the word "lose" when describing the results, because neither one lost anything in Arizona. According to the Arizona Democratic Party, Clinton won 26 Arizona delegates on Tuesday; Obama won 20.

...However, the MSM hasn't been so picky about using the word "loser" in relation to Tuesday's results. It's a strong word that attracts eyes, but considering that most of the Democratic primaries/caucuses award delegates on a proportional basis, it's also a lazy word.

...In addition to the usual descriptions of one or another candidate "winning" or "losing" a state, the word "loser" has been used to describe various endorsers of Senator Obama, such as Arizona's own Governor Janet Napolitano.

From the Washington Post's The Fix (thanks to the AZ Rep's Political Insider for pointing this out) -

Janet Napolitano: The Arizona governor went out on a limb to back Obama and was featured in the Illinois senator's closing ads in the state. In the end, however, Napolitano wasn't able to deliver her state for Obama, a high-profile setback for a politician with clear aspirations for a spot on the national ticket.

She may not have "delivered" the state, but even if the Obama had received the most votes ("winning" the state), Arizona's delegates are awarded proportionally. Winning the state only means a couple of additional delegates.

Of more significance is the fact that Obama went from 14% support in November (according to this Rocky Mountain Poll) to over 41% in February 5th's election.

That change probably doubled, possibly tripled, Obama's Arizona delegate count.

Governor Napolitano may not have "delivered" the state, but states don't matter in this race, delegates do.

...While the MSM tries to spin Tuesday's results as a win for Clinton, it seems that many people disagree - for week's the Obama campaigning has been receiving more donations than the Clinton campaign, including *after* Tuesday. Of course, no matter what the various spin doctors have to say, Clinton realizes how tight the race really is - she's loaned her campaign over $5 million dollars.

Stay tuned...


...On a more local note, the AZ Republic has endorsed Corey Woods, Rhett Wilson, and Julie Jakubek in the race for Tempe City Council. Congrats to all three on the endorsements.

Note - early voting in Tempe's election started today.


Later!

Tuesday, February 05, 2008

Two facts becoming clear...

1. Mike Huckabee won the Republican Vice-Presidential nomination tonight - whoever wins the Rep nomination for President (and more and more, that's looking like McCain), they're going to need Huckabee's ability to deliver in the southern states.

2. Hillary Clinton can spin this as a big victory for her, but "it could have been worse" isn't really a "victory." Barack Obama has more momentum, and even if he doesn't win in California (it's too early to call as I'm writing this), he's walking away from Super Tuesday with a significant amount of delegates. Depending on super delegates, he may have the lead in delegate count.

This race is still so close that we could end up a convention that means something...

More after actual delegate counts are in....

TCE and Scottsdale's water: update on last month's contamination incident

The following is a long post, mostly of the 'copy and paste' variety, so let me summarize -

The Miller Road Treatment Facility remains shut down, and the EPA has ordered a full investigation. The EPA has requested a meeting with the Participating Companies (PCs) this week to discuss a number of options, including leaving the MRTF off-line as far as providing drinking water - it would just be a treatment facility aimed at controlling the spreading groundwater contamination plume. Other options include adding redundant systems.

I've copied and pasted where I could, but for some of it, I had to transcribe letters. I apologize for any typos (mostly misspellings) and take responsibility for those. However, there were a number of instances of poor grammar or awkward word choice. Those are the responsibility of the original writers.

If anyone is interested in the original email and attachments, drop a line to me at cpmaz[at]yahoo.com or contact Vicki Rosen at Rosen.Vicki[at]epamail.epa.gov to be added to her mailing list for the NIBW Community Involvement Group.

On to the actual post...

Vicki Rosen, the EPA's Community Involvement Coordinator, sent out an email yesterday regarding January's incident that affected approximately 5000 customers of Arizona American Water.

The message in its entirety (note: I adjusted the formatting and punctuation for readability, but made no content changes in copying the note or its attachments - except for editing out a couple of phone numbers) -



Hello CIG members,


I wanted to give you a quick update related to the failures at theMiller Road Treatment Facility (MRTF).


First, I've attached at the bottom of this page the Incident Report on the January failure which EPAreceived from the Participating Companies on January 23 and a letter EPA sent to Motorola on February 1. Second, I want to reiterate a few important points:



EPA has ordered a complete investigation into the causes of the incidents.
EPA has ordered a thorough evaluation of all options to ensure that it never happens again.
The treatment plant will remain shut down until EPA, the State and the County are satisfied it will operate safely.
Fines and penalties under the Consent Decree and Safe Drinking Water Act are likely down the road, but for now our highest priority is to ensure clean drinking water to the public.
EPA will review notification procedures that are in place to determine if they are adequate or need to be revised.
Below is information the Arizona American Water Company sent to its customers regarding the exposure the public may have received during the most recent event:


U.S. EPA advises that due to the short term duration of the exposure, the public should not experience and adverse health [sic] affects from tap water that was consumed in the 24 hour period prior to notification and shutting down the system. This would apply to both children and adults consuming up to 6 liters of water per day when TCE levels may have exceeded federal drinking water standards.
Nonetheless, residents with concerns regarding their particular health condition should consult their medical provider. The EPA has shared the sampling data on which this information is based with the ADEQ and Maricopa County.


I will be back in touch with you all as I have more information. In addition, I'm developing a fact sheet for the entire NIBW mailing liston the incident and what's being done about it.


Best,


Vicki

(See attached file: Transmittal_J_Watt.012308.pdf)
(See attached file: MRTF.pdf)


The text of the letter from the NIBW participating companies -


January 23, 2008

Jamey Watt
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region IX (SFD-8-2)
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-3901


Re: Discharge of Groundwater Exceeding Treatment Standards from Miller
Road Treatment Facility



Dear Mr. Watt:

This letter is formal notification that a malfunction at Miller Road Treatment Facility (MRTF) resulted in discharge of groundwater to the Paradise Valley Arsenic Treatment Facility (PVARF) that exceeded the treatment standard of 5 ug/l for trichloroethene (TCE). The equipment malfunction occurred on Tower 3 while treating groundwater extracted from well PCX-1. This notification complies with the seven-day written response requirement as specified in the North Indian Bend Wash Superfund Site Sitewide Operation and Maintenance Plan, dated June 15, 2006.

The blower on Tower 3 shutdown for unknown reasons at approximately 2:30 p.m. on Tuesday, January 15 after the operator had left MRTF for the day. The situation was detected on Wednesday, January 16 at approximately 6:30 a.m. when the operator returned to MRTF for his next shift. At approximately 6:45 a.m., the operator reset the control command and restarted the blower. The treatment train was shutdown at approximately 9:30 a.m. Arizona American Water notified the North Indian Bend Wash Participating Companies of the incident at approximately 10:00 a.m. Remedial Project Managers of Environmental Protection Agency and Arizona Department of Environmental Quality along with City of Scottsdale Water Department staff were contacted and verbally notified of the water quality incident on the same day.

Samples of water were immediately collected by AAW personnel at the MRTF and PVARF and submitted to Transwest Geochem, Inc. for rush analysis of NIBW chemicals of concern (COCs). Laboratory analysis of a sample collected from the MRTF effluent at approximately 9:00 a.m. on January 16 indicated a concentration of TCE at 15 Eg/l. A sample collected at approximately the same time at PVARF had a TCE concentration of 22 Eg/l.


Arizona American Water (AAW) has collected additional samples at PVARF and the Paradise Valley drinking water system. Those data have been submitted to and reviewed by EPA, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, and Maricopa County. AAW has performed extensive response actions and is in communication with their customers and the appropriate agencies regarding the incident.

Well PCX-1 and Tower 3 had been operating continuously without incident since December 14, 2007 following extensive start-up testing. An aggressive monitoring program since mid-December indicated that treated water from MRTF has met treatment standards for the NIBW COCs.

The MRTF control system includes five interlocks associated with blower operation. These interlocks are low air flow rate, high and low air pressure, blower high vibration, and blower status. Initial investigation into the incident has revealed that moisture in the tubing from the air flow rate element to the transmitter prevented the measurement to drop below the interlock set-point when the blower shutdown.

The pressure monitoring device had been replaced, but not fully integrated into the control system and therefore the interlock was not active. Failure of the control system to recognize that the blower had shutdown based on status is unclear at this time.

The MRTF control system also includes redundant operator notifications in the event of certain alarms and shutdowns. Neither of the notification systems responded to the blower shutdown and no notifications were made to alert the operator of the equipment malfunction. Further investigation and testing will be required to determine the exact reason why the blower shutdown in the first place; why the blower status parameter did not initiate an alarm and treatment train shutdown; and why the redundant operator notification systems did not work.

As you know, the MRTF will be under going a non-routine preventative maintenance rehabilitation beginning in February 2008. The rehabilitation activities at MRTF include replacing the packing in each tower and upgrades to instrumentation. Based on the instrumentation and control system malfunctions associated with this incident, the NIBW Participating Companies will also ensure that there is a detailed review and validation of the MRTF control system during the rehabilitation project and that upgrades recommended as a result of this review are implemented.

If you have any questions, please feel free to call me.

Very truly yours,

Dennis H. Shirley, P.G.



The letter from the EPA to Motorola -

February 1, 2008

Mr. Michael Loch
Corporate Director, EHS Strategic Initiatives
Motorola Inc.
1303 East Algonquin Road, Mail Drop: 3rd floor
Schaumburg, Illinois 60196


Subject: Miller Road Treatment Facility, Indian Bend Wash Superfund Site, Phoenix, Arizona


Dear Mr. Loch:


The purpose of this letter is to convey the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) concerns regarding the October 2007 and January 2008 incidents at the Indian Bend Wash Miller Road Treatment Facility (MRTF) which have resulted in discharges of of groundwater in exceedence of the treatment standard of 5 ug/l for trichloroethene (TCE). These continued failures at the MRTF are unacceptable to EPA. We expect a full investigation into both incidents and an evaluation of a full range of options to ensure that failures never happen again.


While we are evaluating our enforcement options, our highest priority is to ensure that safe drinking water is provided to the residents of Scottsdale and Paradise Valley. Therefore, pursuant to the Consent Decree (CD), Motorola on behalf of the Participating Companies (PCs) may not restart the treatment plant until all levels of government are confident that the system will provide clean drinking water and approval is formally granted by EPA, the State, and Maricopa County.


The first failure at the plant, which occurred during a planned maintenance event sometime between October 9, 2007 and October 17, 2007, resulted in incomplete remediation of the the groundwater at the MRTF. The effluent water from MRTF was sampled on October 15, 2007 and the result was 9.3 ug/l of TCE. This water then traveled to the Paradise Valley Arsenic Removal Facility (PVARF) where it was blended with water from other sources at a ratio of approximately 1 to 3 before entering the distribution system. Based on this blending, we project that the water served to the public was below the 5 ug/l MCL for TCE.


Upon learning of this plant failure, EPA and Arizona Department of Environment Quality (ADEQ) began an investigation of the incident which included meeting with the PCs and Arizona American Water on December 17, 2007. During our meeting, Motorola could not fully explain what happened at the Plant during this incident but they assured us that this was an isolated incident resulting from maintenance work being conducted at the plant. We were told that MRTF was to undergo a full rehabilitation that would result in performance improvements. EPA sent a letter to the PCs on December 14, 2007 requesting additional information needed to complete our assessment of the incident. In this December 2007 letter, we outlined short-term and long-term procedural requirements for MRTF to ensure that this type of incident did not reoccur during maintenance events. The PCs responded in a January 4, 2008 letter but did not commit to any procedural or equipment modification as requested. It is unclear at this time if the procedures could have prevented the second incident from occurring because of the uncertainties surrounding both incidents. However, we will conduct a full evaluation of all of the possible interim measures and long-term options taking into account information learned from both failures at the Plant.


A second malfunction at the plant occurred on January 15, 2008. The PCs contacted EPA upon discovery of the equipment malfunction and provided formal notification in a letter dated January 23, 2008. The equipment malfunction occurred on Tower 3 which is used to treat groundwater from PCX-1. The most recent sampling results from PCX1 show TCE concentrations at approximately 70 ug/l. No operator was present at the Plant when the malfunction occurred and the notification systems and alarms failed to function properly. As a result, water from PCX-1 was discharged from MRTF without treatment from 2:30 pm on January 15, 2008 until 6:30 am on January 16, 2008 when the operator returned to the Plant. No samples were collected from the MRTF or PVARF effluents when the malfunction was discovered at 6:30 am. The operator reset the control command and restarted the blower at 6:45 am. The system operated properly from 6:45 am until it was shut down entirely at 9:30 am. The MRTF effluent was sampled at 9:30 am, several hours after the system had been restarted, and TCE was detected at 15 ug/l. The PVARF effluent was sampled at the same time and TCE was detected at 22 ug/l. The PCs indicated that they, along with Arizona American Water, did examine flow conditions during the 16 hour period of the malfunction and based on their calculations believe that the 22 ug/l TCE detected in the PVARF effluent is likely representative of the TCE concentration that entered the drinking water system.


It is the responsibility and legal obligation of the PCs to ensure that the groundwater remedy selected at the NIBW site meets the water quality standards established in the Record of Decision. At this time, the EPA is not confident that the MRTF will completely remediate the groundwater as currently designed or that procedural changes can be put in place sufficient to ensure that a similar incident does not occur in the future. At the same time, both EPA and the State are concerned that if the system remains off too long the plume may spread and impact surrounding wells.


We request a meeting between EPA, ADEQ, and the PCs the week of February 4, 2008 to discuss implementation of interim measures necessary to capture the plume and the process of evaluating the long term options. Interim measures would involve pumping and treating the contaminated groundwater, but not yet serving the treated groundwater as drinking water. Interim measures will give us the time to thoroughly evaluate long term options.


Finally, we request that the PCs respond to the attachment by Feb 22, 2008. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Sheryl Bilbrey at (xxx) xxx - xxxx or myself at (xxx) xxx - xxxx.


Sincerely,


Keith Takata
Director, Superfund Division


Attachment to EPA's letter -

MRTF Attachment
Responses to be submitted to EPA by Feb 22, 2008.

Concurrent with developing responses to this attachment, EPA and the State request a meeting with the PCs, the week of February 4, 2008 to discuss interim measures to pump and treat the contaminated groundwater but not yet serve the treated groundwater as drinking water. While the interim measures are in place, we will have the time to thoroughly sidcuss and carefully decide long term options as described in the last section of this attachment.

The January 23, 2008 letter provides some information regarding the plant failure, however there is addition information required under Section 8.2 of the Operation and Maintenance (O&M) plan that was not included. Specifically, information regarding the person who discovered the malfunction must be provided. We also request that all electronic data from the plant be retained.

Compliance requirements for Consideration as part of the Overall Comprehensive Evaluation of the MRTF for Long Term Operation

EPA formally issued a response to the October 15, 2007 incident on December 14, 2007 outlining short-term and long-term compliance requirements associated with the overall operation of the MRTF, "start-up" sampling requirements, bi-weekly sampling, and notification requirements. Attachment 2 of the letter also included short term requirements for a detailed engineering evaluation of the Tower 2.

The recent failure of Tower 3 warrants a revision to this response letter to include a detailed engineering evaluation on the entire MRTF plant and associated groundwater extraction wells. As a result, the PCs must implement the following requirements in addition to the requirements outlined in the December 14, 2007 response letter to address the long term operation of MRTF. This includes at a minimum, addressing the following key issues:

* A detailed engineering evaluation of Towers 1, 2, and 3. This evaluation should be based on the original design of the MRTF as a basis of comparison. This evaluation should also include the extraction wells and their associated mechanical, electrical, instrumentation, and control systems.

* Provide a detailed work plan for an engineering evaluation of the entire MRTF facility and extraction well systems. This work plan should include a comprehensive and rigorous evaluation and assessment of key equipment, instrumentation and control systems similar in scope to an initial plant start up after construction (e.g. each instrumentation element and control loop is tested individually as well as part of an overall system). As part of the detailed engineering evaluation, trend analysis for all the measured operating and status parameters on the PLC should be done to better understand what caused the system components to fail and what repairs are necessary.

The work plan should also include review and reassessment of all operation and maintenance plans and associated procedures and protocols to validate that operation and maintenance procedures and functions are being properly implemented. Perform all necessary maintenance on Towers 1, 2, and 3 and extraction wells to reflect original design specifications. We suggest the following procedures should be incorporated into the operation and maintenance plan: 1) conduct monthly inspections of these Towers and extraction well systems to check compliance with operational and maintenance plan requirements. Provide a summary report of these observations. Inspections should include verifying alarm conditions and operational response for a non-compliant condition, 2) continue bi-weekly sampling at each of the Tower effluents for a minimum period of 30 days after each of the Towers is compliant with its efficacy. During start-up of each Tower, daily samples with fast turn-around-time should be considered at least for the first 5 days of operation, then switch to bi-weekly sampling as discussed above.

Evaluation of Remedy

Prior to MRTF shutdown, the treated water was discharged to the Paradise Valley Arsenic Removal Facility (PVARF) to be further discharged to either the drinking water supply or the canal depending upon the compliance requirements at the PVARF. We have requested an immediate discussion of interim measures we believe these additional long-term options must also be evaluated:

* Re-injection: Re-inject water back into the aquifer after it is treated at the MRTF. This option would require installation of new injection wells.

* Discharge to Canal: Discharge all treated water at the MRTF to the canal at the PVARF indefinitely.

* Operate More Towers at Reduced Capacity: Operate at least two towers at approximately half capacity each instead of just one tower at near full capacity. In this scenario, if one system were to fail, the effluent contaminant exceedance of the downstream composite water (one-half treated + one-half not treated) would be reduced significantly by about 50 percent.

* Redundant Treatment: Reconfigure the plant plumbing to put two towers in series and use the second tower as a redundant treatment to the first tower. Both towers would have to fail in order to cause a release of untreated water. This alternative would be in addition to the recommended compliance requirements noted above.

* Secondary Treatment: Use Liquid Granular Activated Carbon (LGAC) to treat the groundwater after the air strippers to remove any remaining TCE. This system will serve as a redundant system after the air strippers.

* Continuous VOC Monitoring: Installation of a VOC monitoring sensor to monitor TCE concentrations at a higher sampling frequency. This option would simply detect any TCE exceedances in the effluent of the air strippers. If a TCE exceedance is encountered, then interlocks connecting to the sensor would be programmed to shut the entire system down.

Vote today...

It's February 5, 2008, the date of Arizona's Presidential Preference Election.

If you haven't voted early, make sure you vote today - whatever your party affiliation.

The final nominees won't be chosen today, but it's likely that one candidate in each party will move a lot closer to being their party's nominee.

Be a part of history.

Vote today.

Ten and ten

Sunday, the AZ Republic ran a story highlighting 10 of the more interesting bills before the Arizona Legislature. It was a decent enough story, if a little light on real substance or usable information.

The story, while it did have its good points, was also a very shallow one. 10 bills out of over 1100 filed? That's less than 1%, and the brief blurbs that the Rep wrote about the bills didn't even include basic info such as the name of the sponsor or whether or not the bill has been assigned to a committee.

So, with that serving as inspiration, here's my list of ten and ten - ten bad bills to watch, and ten good bills to watch. These aren't the only 10 bad bills, or the only 10 good bills; there's plenty more of both.

Note: in the interests of minimizing repetitiveness, no anti-immigrant or "let's balance the budget by cutting revenue" bills will be included. Those were covered pretty well in the Legislative Loon p0sts.


Ten bad bills -

...HB2096, a bill to create parental educational choice grants. Introduced by Reps. Biggs, Burges, and Murphy, and Sens. Gorman, Harper and Johnson.

After over 200 words rationalizing the need for such grants, and proclaiming that the bill's purposes are secular, the bill goes on to create a program that awards grants in the amounts of $3500 and $4500 per year payable to the "custodians" of pupils enrolled at private schools.

Undermining public education is bad enough to warrant inclusion on this list, but the language in the bill that states that schools "shall not be required to alter its creed, practices or curriculum in order to redeem grants issued pursuant to this article" is a very thinly-veiled way to funnel public funds to religious schools, notwithstanding the "secular" proclamation a the beginning of the bill.

...HB2477, a bill relating to employees of the state treasurer's office. Sponsored by Rep. Adams. Would authorize the state treasurer (currently Dean Martin) to randomly drug test employees and prospective employees, and to periodically snoop into employees' credit reports.

If Mr. Martin and his water-carrier Rep. Adams believe that there is a drug use problem in the treasurer's office, there are provisions in existing state law that would allow for drug testing in departments where there is evidence of a problem. Even if those provisions don't apply to the treasurer's office, why not change the law so that those provisions *do* apply?

Unless, of course, the underlying purpose of the program would be to control and intimidate office employees, some of whom may have spoken up over the crimes committed by previous treasurer David Petersen, who resigned in disgrace.

Something tells me that the ethically-challenged Martin wants to discourage whistle-blowers with this.

...SB1054, a bill relating to the state treasurer and independent legal counsel. Introduced by Sen. Chuck Gray. Would allow the State Treasurer's office to bypass the Attorney General and contract for outside legal counsel. The bill also exempts such contracts from the state's procurement code with its attendent oversights.

Related: SB1097, a bill from Sen. Burns to exempt the State Treasurer's office from the Government Information Technology Agency's (GITA) requirements.

Can you say "building an independent fiefdom"?

...HB2678, a bill related to welfare recipients and applicants, and drug testing. Sponsored or cosponsored by a cast of thousands (actually, a cast of 31, 30 of whom are Republicans.) Would mandate drug testing of all applicants and recipients of public assistance.

...HB2713, a bill relating to students' expression of religion. Sponsored by Reps. Clark and Anderson. Would bar a school from discriminating against a student or group of students on the basis of religion. The bill includes interesting phrasing - "If an assignment requires a student's viewpoint to be expressed in coursework, artwork or other written or oral assignments, A public educational institution shall not penalize or reward a student on the basis of religious content or a religious viewpoint." I'm not sure of this (I'm most definitely not a lawyer), but I think this might really mess up grading in science classes.

This bill may be related to conflicts like this one in the Deer Valley Unified School District, chronicled in the AZ Republic.

...HCR2041, an amendment to the state constitution barring preferential treatment based on "race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education or public contracting." Sponsored by Reps. Pearce, Barnes, Mason, Murphy, and Nelson and Senators Harper and Johnson. Basically, this is Ward Connerly's scheme to end affirmative action policies.

...SB1064, a bill relating to presidential preference elections. Sponsored by Sens. Harper and Waring. This is the one that opens up presidential primaries for everyone but Democrats. I've written about this one before.

SB1332, a bill relating to DNA testing. Sponsored by Sen. Chuck Gray. The Senator was all people who are arrested to submit to DNA testing. Compliance would be a condition of bail or "own recognizance" release - failure to comply would result in revocation of bail.

Just think - if this was in force when Joe Arpaio and Andrew Thomas tried to intimidate the New Times into silence, not only would the two journalists they arrested have had to submit DNA samples, it would now be incumbent on them to petition a court to have their DNA info removed from the state's database (as opposed to Arpaio and Thomas having to justify keeping it.)

If the esteemed members of the lege think bills like this one and the 'drug tests for welfare' one from above are such great ideas that would benefit the public, why don't they ever propose bills mandating drug and DNA testing for elected officials?

...SB1400, a bill relating to 'gun-free' zones. Sponsored by Sen. Johnson and Reps. Barnes, Burges, and Pearce. The State or "any agency or political subdivision of this state or any person, organization or entity that establishes a gun-free zone" would be held liable for damages if someone is injured or otherwise hurt as a result of criminal conduct in that 'gun-free' zone and that possession of a gun would have helped the victim defend him/herself.

Brought to you by some of the same crew responsible for the 'guns in schools' bill (and the 'guns in bars' bill before it.)

...SB1493, a bill related to early ballots and voter identification. Sponsored by Sens. Gorman and Blendu and Reps. Clark and Pearce. Would mandate that when returning an early ballot, voters must include "a legible photocopy of identification."

How does a photocopy prove anything? Also, what about the expense incurred by voters, as most folks don't have copy machines at home?


Ten good bills...

...HB2114, a bill relating to unattended children in motor vehicles. Introduced by Rep. McClure. Makes the act of leaving a child unattended in a vehicle (subject to a few criteria, such as age) a Class 3 misdemeanor. Repeat offenses are Class 2 misdemeanors.

...HB2141, a bill relating to the disclosure of water supply status during the sale of residential property. Introduced by Rep. Ableser. The bill requires that licensed real estate brokers to "notice of the water supply status of that property as designated by the director of water resources." Related: HB2142, which provides for similar requirements for general sellers (i.e. - non-licensed types.)

...HB2145, a bill related to health insurance and mental health coverage parity. Sponsored by Rep. Ableser, Chabin, Farley, Desimone, and Chad Campbell. Requires that health insurance providers not place greater limitations on mental health services and coverage than they do on physical health services and coverage.

...HB2217, a bill relating to yearly limitations on tuition and fee increases at the state's public universities. Introduced by Reps. Ableser and Schapira. Mandates that any approved fee and tuition hikes not take effect until the academic year following approval.

...HB2293, a bill relating to the sentence imposed on juveniles convicted of first-degree murder. Introduced by Rep. Sinema. Bars imposition of capital punishment upon juveniles. Capital punishment should be abandoned; this bill would be a good first step.

...HB2396, a bill relating to text messaging while driving. Introduced by Reps. Farley, Pancrazi, and Nelson, and Sens. Aboud and Aguirre. Bans the sending or receiving of text messages while operating a motor vehicle. Related: HB2397, banning the use of cell phones while driving, except with a hands-free device and HB2398, banning the use of cell phones while driving, specific to Class G-licensed drivers (aka - under 18 years old).

...HB2651, a bill relating to independent voters and presidential preference primary elections. Introduced by Reps. DeSimone, Farley, Thrasher and Sen. Rios. Would allow independent voters to cast a ballot in the presidential primary of their choice. This is the bill that Sen. Harper should have written, instead of SB1064.

...SB1046, a bill relating to the enactment date of the state's education budget. Sponsored by Sen. Pesquiera. Would mandate that the lege pass the following fiscal year budget for the Arizona Department of Education by April 15th.

So simple it's brilliant. Now to get them to pass the rest of the budget before it hits 100 in Phoenix...

...SB1247, a bill relating to employer communications regarding religion or politics. Sponsored by Sen. Burton-Cahill. Bars an employer from compelling an employee to participate in an activity or communication that has the "primary purpose of communicating the employer's opinion about religious or political matters." The bill has appropriate exemptions for activities mandated by law and also for religious, political, and educational organizations.

This is how a religious liberty bill *should* be written.

SB1010, a bill relating a cell phone users' bill of rights. Sponsored by Sen. Waring. This one was a good idea when Waring introduced it in November; it's a good idea now.

Friday, February 01, 2008

John Shadegg: Star Pupil at the Hayworth School of Campaigning?

One can only hope that Shadegg keeps serving up BP fastballs like this to the Lord campaign...

Congressman John Shadegg (R-Launderer) is now attributing his opposition to the recently-passed (by the House anyway) economic stimulus package because some of the proposed tax rebates might go to undocumented aliens who dared to work, pay income taxes, and file a return.

Now, I'm not exactly a fan of the proposal (it helps retail businesses more than it helps real people and its effects are short-term, not long-term), but he absolutely opposes an effort to mitigate the effects of the burgeoning recession in the U.S. because it could give some undocumented aliens some of their own money?

Yup, that's right - the tax rebates are just prepayments of refunds, essentially; they will reduce the following year's refund/increase the amount owed for each recipient.

And the ever-vigilant John Shadegg detected the harm in giving hardworking people the money that is theirs (whether or not they're in the U.S. legally, they earned the money), so he tried to make sure that no one would be helped.

Even if stealing the tax money of a few undocumented immigrants was an ethical activity (it's not), are there so many that qualify (by paying taxs of all things - what scofflaws! ;) ) that the numbers justify blocking the whole thing?

Of course, this is the guy who left his constituents in the lurch, campaigning for John McCain in South Carolina while Paradise Valley residents dealt with poison coming out of their faucets and one of the guys who voted against HOPE.

Why do I have the suspicion that it's people in general who are on his hit list, and immigrants are just a cover story for his votes and [in]actions?

I guess that with JD Hayworth exiled to the nether regions of the right-wing talk radio, AZ's Republicans need a candidate with a with a campaign platform plank that says "blame brown people for everything." Must be in their state party's bylaws or something. :))

Hope that tactic works as well for Shadegg in 2008 as it did Hayworth in 2006.

Stacy at AZ CongressWatch has most (or all?) of Shadegg's press release here; the Phoenix Business Journal has a story constructed from that press release here.

Later!

Thursday, January 31, 2008

FEC reports are in

Edit to update: Turns out that Bob Lord's (D-CD3) financial report is up; I just missed it. I've updated the appropriate section of the post. Thanks to Drew for the comment...

End edit.

It's that time again - time for a quick summary of fundraising results for the various Congressional campaigns in AZ.


Key - Total raised, $ from individual donors, $ from PACs and committees, Cash on hand, and (where applicable) debts or loans.

I'll comment between CDs.

CD1

Kirkpatrick (D) $186108.71, 166108.71, 24000, 292867.66, 20000 loan

Renzi (R) $0, 0, 0, 1786.60, 456058.23 debt

Hay (R) $41822.32, 23935.92, 17886.40, 155727.77, 20000 loan

Shanker (D) $17517.18, 17517.18, 0, 4069.89

No info as yet from Mary Kim Titla (D) or a Democratic candidate that I've never heard of but who has filed organization paperwork, Jeffrey Brown. He's serious enough to have a real, though under construction, website, so I'll mention him here.

It's early still, but pending the still only rumored entries of other Republicans into the contest, right now the race is shaping up to be between industry lobbyist Hay for the Rs and DCCC-annointed Kirkpatrick for the Ds. Their early money and organizations will be tough to beat.


CD2

Franks (R) $72691, 42191, 30500, 86274.1

Thrasher (D) $8543, 8543, 0, 10693.56

Nothing too surprising here; while Franks is beatable, Thrasher needs support to do it. Surf to his website to volunteer or contribute.


CD3

Shadegg (R) $494544.92, 362794.92, 131750, 863636.22

Loyd (I) $14226.55, 0, 14226.55. 8884.33

Lord (D) $211071.23, 187821.23, 18250.00, 503182.54

Something tells me that Shadegg didn't raise half-a-million dollars in what is traditionally the slowest fundraising quarter of the year in response to Annie Loyd's $14K. While Shadegg has, and is expected to maintain, a fundraising advantage (incumbents usually do), he's in the race of his political life. Perhaps his efforts on behalf of John McCain's presidential campaign have an ulterior motive - he realizes that he benefits with McCain at the top of the ballot in November. McCain's presence, while it may not help Rep candidates nationwide, should fuel increased Rep voter turnout here in AZ.

Shadegg should keep something in mind as the campaign unfolds - by sacrificing his constituents and constituent services to campaign for McCain, he could cost himself more votes than he gains with McCain at the top of the ballot.


CD4

Pastor (D) $80125.63, 38120, 42005.63. 1222975.39

$1.2 million CoH and no opponent (as yet, anyway)? Pastor should expect lots of pressure to help out other Democratic candidates this summer.


CD5

Hayworth (R) $-2200, 0, 0, 15310.3

Mitchell (D) $210680, 137255, 71800, 868883.55

Ogsbury (R) $34880, 33380, 1500, 349191.47

Schweikert (R) $505,993, 246393.51, 9600, 412030.69, 250000 loan

Hatch-Miller (R) Just filed organizational paperwork; don't expect financial numbers until April.

Anderson (R) Just filed organizational paperwork; don't expect financial numbers until April.

Knaperek (R) $19948.54, 19948.54, 0, 27356.99

Even without the quarter million dollar loan, Schweikert is the one to beat (money-wise, anyway) in the Rep primary here, though Knaperek and Anderson are veteran campaigners and will know how to use their more limited funds to good effect.

Note: Telecom/cable industry lobbyist Susan Bitter Smith has said that she will make her run/don't run decision sometime after Super Tuesday. As of tonight, no paperwork for her, organizational or financial reporting, has been posted by the FEC.


CD6

Flake $305414.48, 258613.52, 46800.96, 999110.50

Richard Grayson is running a (self-admittedly) quixotic challenge to Flake, but that million dollars CoH of Flake's isn't aimed at him, it was aimed straight as erstwhile primary challenger Russell Pearce (R-National Alliance).

Pearce has recently set his sights somewhat lower - convincing LD18 State Senator Karen Johnson (R-UFO) to step aside and not run for reelection.

Pearce will face Democrat Judah Nativio for the seat.


CD7

Grijalva (D) $40475, 7975, 32500, 99351.11

The Reps are sure to run someone against Congressman Grijalva (they always do), but unless I miss my guess, Grijalva's organization will expend more effort on rounding up votes for presidential candidate Barack Obama than they'll have to expend on rounding up votes for Raul.


CD8

Bee (R) $151074.24, 141324.24, 9750, 161246.04

Giffords (D) $272253.88, 161209.45, 111044.43, 1317357.30

Unless Tim Bee can pull of a miracle dealing with the state's budget deficit, he may come to regret not resigning his seat in the Arizona State Senate. Giffords has an almost 9-to-1 CoH advantage, and Bee is stuck in Phoenix most of the week.

If he leaves the Senate now, he'll get roundly criticized for abandoning his constituents (something that a candidate for another office doesn't want to deal with); if he doesn't leave, his campaign can't get up to full speed until June or July, by which time, Giffords could have a 20:1 money advantage.

PolitickerAZ has a report on the numbers as well, and they have most of the duelling press releases that accompany the releases of fundraising numbers on the main site.

Later!

Edwards and Obama

On Wednesday, John Edwards ended his campaign for the Democratic nomination for president on Wednesday. Senator Edwards and his influence on the contest will be be sorely missed.

Because with both sides down to two main candidates each (Gravel was always a non-factor on the Democratic side, Giuliani is out on the Rep side, and Huckabee is fading fast), the final four candidates are a rich, elderly white guy (McCain), an even richer middle-aged white guy (Romney), a rich middle-aged white woman (Clinton), and a rich, fast-approaching middle-aged black guy (Obama).

Poor people and poverty in the U.S. will be a non-issue in the campaign by the end of February, if not by the end of Super Tuesday.


Michael Bryan wrote a post, lamenting the fact that he had voted early for Edwards, and now his vote is lost. While I completely understand the sentiment, I have to respectfully disagree with his point.

Like him, I voted early, and like him, I voted for Edwards.

However, I firmly believe that any vote that is cast for the best candidate is never wasted, and John Edwards was the best candidate, Democrat or Republican, in the race when I filled out and returned my ballot.

He was the only major candidate who talked at length about issues of poverty and class in America, issues that none of the other candidates really wanted to pay more than lip service to.

Having said that, my support, if not my vote, goes now to Senator Barack Obama.

While he perhaps is a little too 'Wall Street' for my taste, he truly represents our country's best chance for changing the status quo in D.C.

I expect most of Edwards' supporters to similarly switch to Obama also - Obama's candidacy is the closest to Edwards' in terms of theme and hope for a change.

Later!

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Bill Clinton in Tempe on Thursday

Following up on his wife's AZ visit last week, and perhaps hoping to counteract the effects of Senator Obama's visit later today, former President Bill Clinton is visiting Tempe on Thursday, January 31.

From an email from the Maricopa County Democratic Party -
Former President Bill Clinton to visit Phoenix Thursday 31 January 2008

Former U.S. President William Clinton will speak on behalf of his wife Hillary's campaign at ASU's Grady Gammage Auditorium on the main ASU Campus in Tempe this Thursday, January 31, 2008 at 8:30PM. The auditorium seats only 3,000 people, so anyone wishing to attend should arrive -early- to get in line. Doors will open approximately at 6:30PM.

ASU Grady Gammage Auditorium
1200 S Forest Ave [Click for Map]
Tempe, AZ 85281

The ASU event is free and open to the public subject to available seating. There will also be a private fundraising reception that evening. For more information on that event, please contact Senator Hillary Clinton's local campaign office by calling (602) 279-8030, or stop by their office at 2845 N. Central Ave. (southeast corner of Thomas and Central Ave.).

Later!

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

And the winner is...

Jack Harper, 2nd Runner Up for the 2008 Legislative Loon Award, made a late push today for a recount, with his promise/threat to inflict his brand of lunacy on the entire state, not just LD4.

From the AZ Republic's Political Insider -

Sen. Jack Harper, R-Surprise, was working on pumping up a crowd of loyal Mike Huckabee supporters (like maybe 20) in the state capitol courtyard this afternoon. And, you know, when Mr. Harper has a mic in his hand...you've just got to pause to listen.

{snip}

"I will run for a statewide seat in 2010," Harper announced, adding later that he believes "there is no personal sacrifice too big to stand for your beliefs."

Harper can't officially announce his campaign for an office unless he is prepared to resign from the senate. But he told Insider after his announcement that the positions would either relate to his concerns about election integrity (Translation: running for Secretary of State) or how he's not a big fan of Sen. McCain (Translation: running for U.S. Senate.)

He gets points for a valiant effort, but this isn't Florida circa 2000 or Ohio circa 2004 - all votes count, and they only count once. He's still 2nd Runner Up.

Nope, the decision the judges have reached is final...


Your 2008 Legislative Loon is...


State Representative Russell Pearce!!


OK, so that's not really a surprise; he's always a prime contender for this award. In last year's competition, he fell short because "[h]is brand of lunacy seems to be singularly focused."

He seems to have taken that observation to heart.

Not only does he have his usual slew of immigrant-bashing bills (11 and counting), he's expanded his focus, spitting his venom on the state budget, public safety, public universities, schools, municipalities and the state's voters themselves.

Some of the highlights -

Sponsored HB2220, a permanent repeal of the state equalization property tax. That's a quarter billion dollar hit to school funding annually (legislative fiscal note here)...

...Sponsored HB2339, a bill to create a voluntary tax fund to balance the state's budget...

...Cosponsored HB2603, a bill to bar the use of photo-enforcement generated speeding tickets as a basis for MVD suspending a driver's license or as a basis for an insurance company to raise premiums or withdraw coverage from a driver...

...Sponsored HB2637, a bill to bar municipalities from imposing a sales tax (or something similar) on a laundry list of business activities and services while cosponsoring HB2641, a bill that would redirect some state-shared revenues from municipalities to property owners who live in unincorporated areas. So, one one hand he is reducing the amount of money that cities and towns receive from the state while on the other hand he wants to restrict their ability to make up the difference.

Note: this bill refers to A.R.S section 43-1072.02, but I couldn't find that particular section. There is a section 43-1072.01, but not a section .02. I'm not sure if it's a mistake in drafting the bill or a failure in my research abilities.

...Sponsored HB2678, a bill to require drug testing of all welfare recipients and applicants for welfare...

...Sponsored HCR2019, an amendment to the state constitution to bar legislators from holding a position on a local school board. The most interesting part about this one is that a brief search of legislative bios showed that one of the people that would be affected by this is Rep. Rich Crandall (R-LD19), one of Pearce's fellow Mesa Republicans.

...Sponsored HCR2044, an amendment to the state constitution to allow the lege to ignore voter-approved limitations on legislative appropriations, if the lege certifies in writing that it needs to do so in order to avoid a budget deficit.

...Sponsored HCR2049, an amendment to the state constitution to create a crime victims restitution fund (sounds good, right? Hang on...) by diverting monies awarded as punitive damages awarded for death or injury.

The victim to whom the punitive damages were initially awarded would then receive not the amount awarded, but only the amount his/her attorney spent on punitive damages research, plus 10 percent.

...Cosponsored SCM1002, a Senate Memorial (aka - letter to the U.S. Congress) supporting an amendment to the U.S. Constitution ending the direct election of U.S. Senators by the voters of the various states and reinstituting the election of U.S. Senators by the legislatures of the various states.

And then, of course, there is his crowning achievement in legislative lunacy -

SB1214, the now-infamous bill to allow concealed weapons on school campuses.

Overall, he has sponsored or cosponsored at least 8 measures that would limit or reduce state revenues during a legislative session where he'll be helping to deal with a billion dollar budget deficit.

...So why is he the chair of the House Appropriations Committee?

Besides his legislative proposals, he still spouts off on a regular basis, and not he doesn't limit he pronouncements to only the subject of immigrants. He's spread his rhetorical wings.

For example, at the same January 23 meeting of the Joint Appropriations committee cited in Harper/2nd Runner Up post, Pearce advocated that, instead of funding institutions of higher education, the state should just give out vouchers that students could use wherever they chose to. (Check at approximately the 1:57:00 mark of the longer January 23 Joint Appropriations meeting on this page.)

So, for leaving his single-minded obsession behind, for expanding his bile-spreading efforts to include poor people, voters, students, fellow Republicans, higher education in general, municipalities' financial stability, and more, State Representative Russell Pearce (R-National Alliance) is the Arizona Legislature's

2008 Legislative Loon.

Addendum: There were a couple of Pearce's bill that looked like they might be bad news, but I'm not sure what they really do. He sponsored SB1139, a bill to change some of the rules for the state treasurer, including one that allows him to charge higher administrative fees in the various investment pools overseen by the state treasurer. Also, he sponsored HB2600, a bill that requires the state to purchase performance management software that meets very specific criteria. I don't know if this is a good bill or something that is geared to direct a lucrative state contract to a particular software vendor.

Have a good night...

Monday, January 28, 2008

Tempe City Council forum

Edit on 1/31 to add update at the end of the original post...

I was going to try to write a complete summary of the forum, but there were too many candidates and too many questions for me to keep up.

However, on many issues, the candidates' answers were similar, so let me sum those up -

School district unification? Some supported, some opposed, some were neutral - all said it was an issue to be decided by the voters, not the the City Council.

Taxes? Hate 'em.

Neighborhoods? Love 'em.

Businesses? Need more and buy local, too.

Quality of life? Yup, that's important, too.

And so on... :)


For more detailed info on a candidate's positions, visit their website -

Mark Mitchell

Hut Hutson

Darryl Jacobson-Barnes,

Corey Woods

Rhett Wilson

Joel Navarro

Julie Jakubek


...While I couldn't do justice to all of the answers given by the candidates, I can give some impressions/evaluations of the candidates' performances.

Note to the candidates and their supporters: While some of these evaluations contain criticisms, none of the criticisms are personal, or even are content-based. All of the candidates seem as if they are civic-spirited Tempeans who genuinely want to serve their community.

There were no bad candidates there last night, though a couple of them should work on their performances.

Anyway, on to the good stuff -


Corey Woods was easily the most polished and comfortable candidate on the dais. He spoke directly and firmly and his answers were direct, pertinent, and well-thought-out. There were a couple of minor mistakes, but they were more in the "picking nits" category than the "major gaffe" category. Combine tonight's performance with a solid ground game (*lots* of walking and knocking), and he has a good chance in March.


Hut Hutson was very solid. His positions and answers mostly hammered home the successes of the current council (he's an incumbent). There was one question, asking what the candidate considered to be the most pressing environmental issue facing Tempe. He hit that one out of the park. He answered with 'water' and proceeded to show that he had an understanding of the nuances and 'beyond Tempe' facets of the issue. Overall, he'll be tough to beat.


Mark Mitchell, also an incumbent, did a good job with the content of his answers, but his presentation of those answers left a lot to be desired. For example, he tended to shift his gaze over the audience while he gave his answers. However, the event was also televised on Tempe's Channel 11 and what works well with a live audience will look like hell on television. He didn't have to look at the camera, but he should have focused his answers on one of his tablemates and let the camera find him. His style works better in small group and one-on-one interactions and in forums that are more "live audience" oriented.


Julie Jakubek, a neighborhood activist and small business owner, did OK for a relative novice, but she told the audience about how she and her husband won an award for their home improvement project, and she told us four or five times. She did an excellent job at projecting her energy but should be careful not to become a single-issue candidate (neighborhoods). "Signature issue" = good; "sole issue" = not good.

Daryl Jacobson-Barnes, also a neighborhood activist and small business owner, spoke clearly but too many of her answers were of the "I need to say *something*; hope nobody notices that I don't have a lot of specifics" variety. However, she did a better job than

Joel Navarro, a Phoenix firefighter and Tempe community activist. While it was obvious that he cares deeply for Tempe, most of his answers were rambling generalities. He came across as passionate but unprepared, and that isn't a good combination with the campaign season peaking.

Rhett Wilson, former town councilor in Kearny, AZ and currently working on economic development issues for ASU, did a solid job. His answers demonstrated his knowledge of the issues (he had a few 'non-answer' answers, but not so many that he could be called 'unprepared.') His delivery was occasionally a little dry, but also occasionally showed great passion. In addition, he was the only candidate to directly challenge another candidate. He called out Hut Hutson. Hutson cited his record as a tax-cutter during some of his answers, and Wilson brought up a council vote from 2005 (I think it was 2005, anyway) that belied Hutson's claims. Not being familiar with the nuances of Tempe's recent political history, I have no idea if the barb hit the mark.


...Having said all that, everyone, even the candidates that I've criticized or complimented here, should remember that municipal elections are won on the ground. Walking neighborhoods, talking to residents, and speaking to community groups get the job done in local elections. There were less than 100 people in the live audience and an unknown (but probably very small) number watching at home. Tuesday's forum didn't lock up a win for or lock out anyone's candidacy.

There are seven candidates for the three openings that are on the ballot in March, so four of these candidates will be disappointed. However, they are all fairly young (with the exception of Hut Hutson, who's been in Tempe longer than I've been alive :) ), and I expect that, win or lose in March, most of these candidates will be staying involved in elective politics, whether in Tempe or in more regional campaigns (lege?). It will be interesting to watch their growth as campaigners.

Lastly, all of the candidates should be complimented. They're taking time out of their lives and risking public criticism and ridicule to win a job where, no matter what they do, they'll tick off someone.

At home, they'll get late night phone calls, emails, and letters. At work in the council chambers, they'll face a steady stream of people stepping up to the podium to rail against everything they do.

They know all this, and yet they're still stepping up to serve.

Thank you.

Edit to add:

In the aftermath of the forum, the Tempe Chamber of Commerce (one of the sponsors of the forum), announced their endorsements in the Tempe City Council race.

From the Arizona Republic -

The Tempe Chamber of Commerce is endorsing City Council candidates Joel Navarro, Corey Woods and incumbent Mark Mitchell.

Congrats to all three...

End edit...

Barack Obama visiting Phoenix on Wednesday

Courtesy an email from the campaign -
Please join Barack Obama at a 'Stand for Change' Rally in Phoenix where he'll talk about his vision for bringing America together and bringing about the kind of change we can believe in.

'Stand for Change' Rally with Barack Obama and special guests Gov. Janet Napolitano and Caroline Kennedy

Arizona Veterans Memorial Coliseum
at the Arizona State Fair Grounds
1826 W. McDowell Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85007

Wednesday, January 30
Doors open: 3:30 p.m.
The event is free and open to the public, but an RSVP is strongly recommended:

http://arizona.barackobama.com/phoenix

For security reasons, do not bring bags. Please limit personal items. No signs or banners are permitted.

This will be Obama's third major public appearance in the Phoenix area in the last year and a half.

Later!