Newbies at the Arizona State Legislature (or perhaps people who are newly-minted lege-watchers) may have an idealized view of it, thinking that it's a legislative body looking out for the best interests of the people of AZ.
The reality of the AZ lege is somewhat different.
If there were a course on it, the syllabus for that course would include a section on "The Double Standard."
To whit (because this stuff would be certain to be covered in such a course) -
From KXNV (Phoenix channel 15), written by Rachel Louise Just, dated 9/5 -
Sen. Analise Ortiz faces ethics investigation over ICE warning repost
State Senator Analise Ortiz is facing an ethics investigation and calls for expulsion from the Arizona Senate after she reshared a post that included the location of an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operation.
This week, State Senator Jake Hoffman, R-LD12, formally asked for an ethics investigation into Ortiz, hoping it would lead to her expulsion.
"I think it's a clear violation of that oath of office," Hoffman told ABC15.
Yet,
From AZMirror, written Jerod MacDonald-Evoy -
Ethics Committee won’t investigate Islamophobic comments from Republican representative
The House Ethics Committee will not investigate an ethics complaint by Democratic leaders against Kingman Republican John Gillette, after he called Muslims “f***ing savages” and posted a series of Islamophobic comments on social media calling members of the faith “terrorists” from “sh*t hole countries” intent on destroying America.
House Ethics Committee Chairman Lupe Diaz, R-Benson, said he would not be taking the matter further and claimed that Democratic leaders were “weaponizing” the House Ethics complaint process. Diaz has not responded to multiple requests for comment about Gillette’s comments or the ethics complaint from the Arizona Mirror.
Whatever could be the difference between the two members? (that's sarcasm folks - I know what the difference is)