Not much is on the lege's schedule as yet, though the budget could drop at any time.
Schedules can, and frequently do, change at any moment when the legislature is in session. So pay attention.
Note: HHR refers to a hearing room in the House building; SHR refers to one in the Senate building.
Note2: Generally, I'll only specify bills that look to spread propaganda. Other bills may be more conventionally bad (think: corrupt or other misuses of public monies and/or authority). My recommendation is that if an agenda covers an area of interest to you, read the entire agenda.
Note3: Each chamber's respective Rules Committee meets on Monday, the House's in HHR4, generally at 1 p.m. and the Senate's in Senate Caucus Room 1, generally also at 1 p.m. Both committees serve as rubber stamps for bills leadership wants to be advanced and gatekeepers for measures that leadership wants stopped.
Note4: Meeting start times may be listed, but are flexible. Before journeying to the Capitol or viewing the meeting online, verify the start time.
Note5: Watch for strikers, or strike everything amendments. Those involve inserting language that replaces the entirety of a bill. Those can be introduced at any time and can make a previo
On Monday, 6/9 - Nada.
On Tuesday, 6 10
-
Senate Education and Technology meets at 9 a.m.is SHR1. On the agenda: no bills, two board nominations:
Dr. José Luis Cruz Rivera for the State Board of Education
Felipe Jose Garcia for the Arizona Board of Regents
Senate Director Nominations meets (finally!) at 10:30 a.m. in SHR109. On the agenda: no bills, one director nomination -
Kimberly Ann O'Connor for the Arizona Department of Homeland Security
It's not yet on the schedule, but the legislature has been conducting floor activity on Wednesdays. They did so last Wednesday and I expect that they will continue to do so, at least until a budget drops.
Then all hell will break loose.
One bill that may make a return is SB1230. It failed last Wednesday on a roll call vote, but was approved for reconsideration by a voice vote.
The bill would mandate funding for clinical trials of marijuana, and as it would alter a voter-passed measure, it needs a 3/4 vote from each chamber of the legislature to pass into law.
It reached that threshold in the Senate (barely!) but didn't quite reach that threshold in the House.
My guess?
Even if the supporters of the bill get the votes of every member who missed the original vote AND are are able to change the minds, and votes, of a few of the opponents, they still won't reach the needed threshold of 45 votes.
In other words, it may not actually return