Event: Immigration: Myths and Misconceptions

Info courtesy the LD8 Democrats:

Immigration: Myths and Misconceptions. A Community Forum
(45 minutes of panel discussion followed by 45 minutes of Q & A)

When?
Tuesday, May 3rd at 6:30pm (doors open at 6:00)



Where?
Scottsdale Community College: Student Center, Turquoise Room

(Just East of the Loop 101 at Chaparral)

Please park in Lot A

Who? (The Panelists)

Alfredo Gutierrez: Former AZ State Senator, radio host

John Loredo: Former AZ State Representative

Todd Landfried: Spokesman, Arizona Employers for Immigration Reform

Lisa Urias: President/CEO at Urias Communications

Terry Greene Sterling: Journalist and Author

Ezequiel Hernandez Immigration Attorney, VP of Somos America

Tobin in as AZ House speaker, Adams out and running for Congress

In a bit of a surprise (to me, anyway), Rep. Andy Tobin (R-LD1) was elected Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives.

From the Arizona Republic story written by Mary Jo Pitzl -

The Arizona House of Representativesgot a new leadership lineup Thursday when members elected Rep. Andy Tobin, R-Paulden, as speaker and Republicans chose Rep. Steve Court, R-Mesa as their majority leader.

Tobin replaces Kirk Adams, who resigned from the House and promptly announced his bid for an open congressional seat in the southeast Valley. Adams revealed U.S. Sen. Jon Kyl as his honorary campaign chairman.

The reason that I was a a little surprised by Tobin's elevation to the speaker's post isn't that I think he is less qualified than the other Republicans (hey - I'm a Democrat, so I think *all* of the Rs are unqualified for the job :) ), but he's a rural Republican, and generally, the center of Republican power in AZ is Maricopa County.  The House hasn't had a Speaker from a rural district since the late Jake Flake in 2003/2004. 

However, the election of Rep. Steve Court as Majority Leader does maintain the rural/urban balance.

The election of Tobin does signal one thing:

Arizona will continue to be the country's embarrassment.


From the press release emailed by the Republican House caucus -

Last – but certainly not least – Speaker Tobin is a devoted Yankee’s [sic] fan...

So, in addition to the anti-immigrant hysteria, the pro-gun fetishism, the "birther" insanity, and more abominations, Arizona has now solidified its position as the America's shame -

We have a Yankees fan in high public office.

...So sayeth the lifelong Red Sox fan... :))

Schweikert two-stepping all over his constituents

From an op-ed written by Congressman David Schweikert and  published in the East Valley Tribune on March 11, 2011 -

"I remain committed, as I have always been, to protecting seniors..."

From Section 501 of H. Con. Res. 34 (page 58 of the linked .pdf), aka "the Ryan budget" that Schweikert voted for a little more than a month later, April 15, 2011 -

(2) For future generations, when they reach eligibility, Medicare is reformed to provide a premium support payment and a selection of guaranteed health coverage options from which recipients can choose a plan that best suits their needs.

Schweikert is holding a "listening session" today.

At a police station in Tempe.

Just guessing here, but if his rationale behind meeting with the residents of CD5 while surrounded by the police is to intimidate dissenters from attending, perhaps he should reexamine his reasoning - his tea party supporters are the ones who think that "disorderly conduct" and "public discourse" are synonymous.

Trying to hide from legitimate dissent by hiding in a police station will only accomplish two things -

1.  His most ardent supporters will have to stay away for fear of picking up a charge or two, which would hurt Schweikert's reelection chances - if you get convicted of a felony in AZ, you lose your voting rights unless they are restored.

2. His strongest dissenters, who tend to know a few things about how to conduct themselves in public and can make their points without getting arrested, will have an easy time locating him.

They're not going to find it difficult to find him and make him aware of their displeasure at the way he has thrown the nation's, and the district's, seniors under the bus.

Still, this whole "first step one way then step the other way" routine is good basic training for his post-Congress gig -

A third-tier celebrity also-ran on "Dancing With The Stars."

Adams resigning as House Speaker

From the Arizona Republic -

State House Speaker Kirk Adams will leave the chamber's top leadership post, his spokesman said Tuesday, and representatives will pick a new speaker to serve out the rest of Adams' two-year term.

Adams did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but spokesman Daniel Scarpinato confirmed that Adams planned to step down as speaker Thursday.

Scarpinato declined to say whether Adams also plans to resign his state House seat.

The move isn't really a surprise, as the worst-kept secret in Arizona politics is that Adams is going to run for Congress next year.

Things *could* get interesting if Adams tries to hang on to his House seat - while Arizona's "resign-to-run" law is all but toothless, it could still impact his ability to raise money between now and the beginning of 2012. 

I expect that he will ultimately resign from the House, not just give up his speakership, because regardless of what the district maps look like, he is likely to face significant primary opposition for the open seat. 

He's smart enough to know better than to give the other candidates a big head start, and the duties of even a rank-and-file member of the legislature could get in the way of serious campaigning.

Anyway, House Republicans are expected to choose Adams' successor as speaker on Thursday.  The Republic article speculated that they will choose either Rep. John Kavanagh (R-LD8), chair of House Appropriations, or Rep. Eddie Farnsworth (R-LD22).  Two other names that could possibly percolate in watercooler talk are Reps. Andy Tobin (R-LD1), the current House majority leader or Jim Weiers (R-LD10), a former speaker.

Still, the Republic's speculation is probably in the ballpark - both Kavanagh and Farnsworth are viewed as ambitious, having aspirations to higher office.  A speakership entry on the political resume could definitely help either one in that regard.

Later...

Tuesday's Event: Eat, Drink and Thank Harry

From the Arizona Democratic Party  (follow the link to make a contribution) -



Time to update the Arizona constitution: A few modest proposals

This state is in serious trouble, the kind of trouble that won't be cleaned up for generations (if ever) and even then only if we started in on the mess right now. 

And, pardon my cynicism, I don't expect that to happen anytime soon.

As much as I would like to lay the blame for the mess we're in at the feet of the Republicans in the legislature (and their ideological and corporate masters), they're just a particularly odious symptom of the greater issue.

Voter apathy.

Too many voters don't pay attention to politics or the actions and votes of elected officials until an election is nigh by which time, the rhetoric is less about a calm and honest discussion of facts and more about people screaming into a TV camera - "MY CANDIDATE WALKS ON WATER!" "NO HE DOESN'T!  HE KICKS KITTENS AND DROWNS PUPPIES! - and most casual observers (and many not-so-casual ones, too) are thoroughly turned off and angry.

They look for someone to blame, and end up voting for whichever candidates or party provides them with a bumpersticker-simple slogan that best expresses/stokes their anger, and gives them a convenient target or two to direct their anger toward (i.e. - Russell Pearce, Jan Brewer, John Kavanagh, et. al. and their targeting of immigrants in general and Mexicans in particular).

As such, we end up with a legislature like the one that recently adjourned - corrupt, bigoted, and absolutely opposed to responsible governance.  I'd call it the most craven Arizona legislature ever, but something tells me that this was just a warm up for next year.

I freely admit that it will take someone brighter than me to figure out how to crack the voter apathy problem, but I do have a few ideas for reining in the baser urges of Pearce et. al. and their future equivalents


FIrst up, the BIG ONE:  Fiscal Responsibility and Stability
This is an iffy one because it relies on the same voters I've just criticized for apathy, but it's necessary.

1. The voters need to temporarily suspend the provision in Article 9, Section 22 of the Arizona Constitution that requires a 2/3 vote of the legislature to raise taxes.  When it is re-implemented, it should be with a matching provision that would require a similar 2/3 vote by the legislature to do anything that reduces state revenue, being through repeals, rate reductions, credits, incentives, or whatever.

Simply put, even the "good" members of the legislature are rank amateurs who are heavily influenced by the pressures and vagaries of short-term political need and almost always forego proposals and plans that involve incurring near-term costs while reaping long-term benefits.

It should not be easy to raise taxes (hence the temporary suspension, not a permanent repeal), but that 2/3 provision has been used cripple the state's fiscal stability.  For more than a generation, the state's Republicans have lowered taxes, particularly for the wealthy and corporations, via a simple majority vote, but a small cadre of ideologues has used the 2/3 provision to block any attempts to correct the state's fiscal and revenue situation.

Finally, to make this work, the voters will need to elect Democrats for at least the four years of the suspension.  Some will say that is just my partisanship speaking, but in this case, my thinking is rooted in simple political reality.

It will take at least 47 members (31 House, 16 Senate) to make up the legislative majority needed to do this, and there aren't 47 Republicans in the state with the juice to make it through a primary and the spine to do what's right for the state, much less 47 who'll stand for office.

In very practical terms, the Democrats are needed.

2.  Related to #1, the voters should pass a referendum to require that each and every current legislatively-granted tax credit, reduction, deduction, etc. be referred to the voters over the following three election cycles.  If a particular provision isn't approved by the voters, whether through direct disapproval or because it didn't go before the voters, that provision ceases to exist.  The recipients of special interest tax breaks would have to stand before hundreds of thousands of voters to justify their special treatment, not just slip a few bribes campaign contributions and "educational trips" to a few lawmakers.


Other provisions (some could be done in statute, but others would have be be changes to the AZ Constitution) -

- When speaking or writing or otherwise communicating on public matters, all elected officials and all active candidates for office should be considered to be under oath until Election day (if they lose the election) or until the end of their terms (if they win).  Too much bad public policy is justified on the basis of propaganda and outright lies.

Violations would result in a perjury charge, and conviction on that charge would result in removal from office (or removal from the ballot, in the case of candidates) and ineligibility for elected office for the next two complete election cycles.

-  Any measures passed during "special" sessions need a 2/3 vote of each chamber to pass

- Appropriations and revenue bills cannot be considered or passed during "special" sessions of the lege.

- The budget must be balanced and passed by the end of the first business day in April.  If it isn't balanced and passed by then, all consideration of non-budget measures is suspended until it is done.

- If it isn't complete by the end of the first business day in May, all consideration of non-budget measures ceases for the duration of the legislative session.

- If the budget isn't complete - balanced, passed, and signed into law - by the end of the first business day of June, the governor and the 90 members of the legislature shall be incarcerated until a balanced budget is passed and enacted.  They will be held in a temporary holding facility constructed on the grounds of the Capitol Mall. 

Think Arpaio's tent city, just without the creature comforts, and located at Wesley Bolin Plaza.  And with bleachers set up outside the fence so that the public has the opportunity to observe the legislature in its natural environment.  :))

I figure they hold out for a maximum of three nights, spent try to get some sleep while learning which of the Weiers brothers snores the loudest and trying to ignore the wonderful aroma from the bank of porta-potties wafting through the tent.  :)

- With the exception of ballot referrals specifically required by the voters (such as the affirmation/overturning of special interest tax breaks above), the legislature shall refer no more than five measures to the ballot in any one two-year period, including measures for which a special election is called.

- "Emergency" measures, those that go into effect immediately upon the signature of the governor, currently require a 2/3 vote of each chamber to enact the "emergency" clause.  Unfortunately, the word "emergency" has changed in meaning to that of "politically expedient." 

Witness HB2191, a bill to bar the award of punitive damages to undocumented immigrants. 

It was designed to protect a specific rancher who unlawfully held a number of immigrants at gunpoint and was later ordered to pay damages.  This concept deeply offended the nativists in the legislature, and they used their positions to railroad through this bill in time to exempt the rancher from having to actually pay his debt.

Because of the abuse of the "emergency" clause, it's time to move the enactment threshold to a 3/4 vote.  If the abuse continues, we'll have to move the threshold to a unanimous vote.

- No "suspension of the rules" regarding time requirements would be allowed during special sessions.  Under most circumstances, it takes at least three days to pass a measure.  However, by a 2/3 vote, the rules, such as those requiring a certain amount of notice before a bill can be considered, can be suspended.  Too many bad bills have been all-but-completely-hidden from public view and input by passing them during one day special sessions.

- In cases where a legislator invokes or is granted immunity from arrest for an act committed during the legislative session, the prosecution "process clock" (the best term this non-attorney can come up with) is suspended for the duration of the legislative session.  In most cases, prosecutors have a limited amount of time to bring a case forward and losing 2, 3, or even 4 months to inaction because of "legislative immunity" can potentially impact their ability to seek justice.  Prosecutors with a legitimate case should not be penalized because a defendant is an elected official.

Yes, this is squarely pointed at Sen. Scott Bundgaard's domestic abuse incident.

- If the legislature passes and the governor signs or otherwise allows to become law a measure that is later overturned in federal or state court as unconstitutional, the legislators who voted for the measure and the governor shall be personally liable for the costs that the state incurred defending the measure.  A "good faith" exception would be made for measures that garnered at least a 3/4 vote in each chamber of the legislature.

- Measures cannot be considered by the legislature between the hours of 9 p.m and 7 a.m...this is one that I believe that most sitting legislators won't have an objection to...Particularly ones who have experienced one or more of the lege's infamous overnight sessions.

-  Lastly (for now), ethics and corruption laws would be significantly, even harshly, tightened up.  The lobbyist gift limit, currently set at $10, would become zero.  Meals, even those offered to every legislator, would be disallowed.  Inducements, such as trips and junkets, even "educational" ones, would be completely barred.

Violations would be Class Two felonies for both the givers and the recipients.  Convictions would carry a minimum sentence of five years in state prison per violation, and the terms for multiple offenses would have to be served consecutively.

It's one thing to disagree with an elected official on policy matters - it's politics, and politcs is all about disagreement.  If someone can't accept that with at least a little aplomb and maturity, they should consider staying away from politics entirely.

However, it's another thing entirely when the elected officials involved have no credibility because people have evidence that the electeds are dirty, crafting public policy based on "inducements" (aka - "bribes") from special interests.

Right now, Arizona government in general, and the state legislature in particular, is viewed as unprofessional, petty, and corrupt.

It's long past time to restore the honor and credibility of state government, even if the participants don't like it...and trust me, they won't.


...Thank you for allowing me to vent.  I'm under no illusions here - most of these ideas have no chance of ever becoming law.  However, one of my reasons for starting the blog was to serve as an outlet for expressions of frustration with what is wrong with Arizona.

After watching this legislature in action since January, some frustration has built up.

Coming Attractions: A "special" session of the legislature to turn every state job into a political patronage job

On Friday's edition of Horizon on PBS, three Capitol beat journalists - Howie Fischer (Capitol Media Services), Ginger Rough (Arizona Republic), and Dennis Welch (Arizona Guardian) - discussed the final hours of the legislative session and made one prediction:

Later this year, perhaps in the fall, there will be a special session of the legislature to pass Jan Brewer's scheme to remove the few civil service protections accorded to Arizona state employees.

Brewer was hot to get her proposal passed during the waning moments of the legislative session, to take some of the GOTP thunder from Wisconsin's Scott Walker, who has been on his own anti-worker jihad.

The video archive for the show isn't available as yet, but when it is, it should be here.  The Arizona Capitol Times has a full story here.  That story is behind a subscription paywall, and is chock full o'blather from the likes of Jan Brewer, Russell Pearce and Kirk Adams about how the proposal is really isn't about attacking workers and making them political slaves to Brewer et, al., but is all about helping the economy and weeding out bad employees, but not about undermining the effectiveness of government agencies or simple base patronage.  Here is the money quote:

Pearce said the plan would allow the state to hire good employees and get rid of bad ones more quickly.


“It’s a great thing to hire at-will,” he said. “All it is, is efficiency in government."

That from the same Russell Pearce who was fired, by a REPUBLICAN governor, as head of the Motor Vehicles Divsion (MVD), after, among other things, hiring one of his sons to work there.  A son who was later caught issuing false IDs for his friends.

Well, I probably shouldn't do this, but for them, and you, here's a sneak preview of the main rhetorical thrust of the posts that will go up when they pass this scheme (and it surely will pass):

The have removed the due process protection of right to a trial by jury for those accused of misdemeanor DUI, and now they wish to remove the due process protections for those accused of nothing more than doing their jobs while not being cozy enough with elected officials, lobbyists, or other political hacks.

They should be careful what they wish for.

This is the same group of legislators who take bribes from the Fiesta Bowl, proclaim themselves above the laws that the rest of us live by when they carry guns while parading around public buildings and are simply beyond the law even after assaulting their girlfriends by the side of the freeway.

Weakening due process might not be the brightest idea for this bunch.

Russell Pearce: A flexible man...with the truth anyway.

After the Fiesta Bowl released the report of its internal investigation into illegal campaign contributions and gifts of trips to football games to elected officials, one of the biggest names in the report, State Sen. Russell "The Law Is The Law" Pearce loudly and repeatedly proclaimed his innocence and purity in the matter, sticking to the story that he actually paid for his own tickets and that he had receipts to prove it.

Of course, he never actually produced those receipts.

As such, today's news in the Arizona Capitol Times didn't come as a surprise to most observers.

From the story by Jeremy Duda (subscription required) -

Senate President Russell Pearce amended several years’ worth of financial disclosure reports to include Fiesta Bowl-sponsored trips, and repaid the bowl for several tickets. In a written statement, Pearce said today he repaid the Fiesta Bowl $272 for football game tickets.

A complete AP story, written by Paul Davenport, is here.

#SchweikertFail: Some things aren't dilemmas for true public servants

In baseball, some players are "batting practice heroes," and some are "gamers."


The same is true in politics - there are wannabes, who put on a spectacular show when it doesn't count, and there are actual public servants who do the work in the trenches of public policy, taking positions and casting votes that certain of their supporters won't like (and that they themselves may not particularly like), but that are in the best interests of their constituents.

Congressman David Schweikert is shaping up as a wannabe, not a real, public servant.

From the Washington Post -

On his 104th day in office, Rep. David Schweikert stepped before about 60 of his constituents here and, like an economics professor, flipped through one scary chart after another to hammer home his point: America faces a tidal wave of debt.
Then he asked for a show of hands: If you were a freshman congressman like him, would you vote to raise the government’s debt limit?

{snip}

This is his dilemma: He knows Congress has little choice but to raise the amount of money the government can borrow to prevent the economic havoc sure to follow if the United States defaults on its loans. He also knows doing so is deeply unpopular — not only among his conservative base, but among some moderates and liberals, too.


“I desperately want to vote ‘no,’ ” Schweikert said at the town hall. “I also desperately don’t want [the economy] to crash.”

If Schweikert finds himself in a difficult political spot, it’s partly of his own making. He and the scores of other Republicans who were elected last fall ran on an unyielding pledge to cut spending, reduce the nation’s debt and generally get the country’s finances in order, a mission that has been fully embraced by party leaders in Washington.

When Harry Mitchell was in Congress, there were a number of times when I disagreed with his votes on certain measures, but I never disagreed with his motivation for those votes - trying to find the best way to serve the interests of the people of the 5th Congressional District.  He was willing to set aside his personal ideology to do what he thought was right by his constituents.

He didn't necessarily like all of the votes, but he cast the votes he thought were necessary.

David Schweikert?

If he played baseball, he'd lead the league in batting practice homers.

Ben Quayle fails geography

Ya know, you'd think that when his father opened up his rolodex of names of competent political campaign staffers to help his son buy his way into Congress, he'd have given his son a name (or two or three) of a competent office staffer, too.

However, based on today's news, you'd think wrong.

From the Arizona Guardian (story is behind subscription paywall, so the link is to the general site):

Congressman Ben Quayle's always been accused of being a carpetbagger of sorts but the GA's thinking this is getting a bit out of hand. It seems Congress' most famous son of an ex-vice president doesn’t even know where he serves these days. It appears that Quayle thinks he works for the good people of Illinois' sixth congressional district and actually wants to nominate the kids there to one if the country's military academies. That's right, according to Quayle's congressional website he says, "I may nominate applicants who are legally domiciled within the boundaries of the sixth District of Illinois."

Well, there's a silver lining in all this for Quayle - right now, his nicknames tend to be potato-based ("li'l spud", "potatoe chip", etc.) but those are based on something his father did, not that he did himself (hmmmm...sounds a LOT like his political career... :) ).

With this, perhaps for the first time in his life, he's earned something completely on his own.

Hereafter (or at least until his next embarrassing screwup) let Ben Quayle be known to all as

Rep. Ben Quayle (R-copy and paste).

Race for Phoenix Mayor: Mulitcultural Conversation event Tuesday

Thanks for the heads-up on this to Felecia Rotellini...

Greg Stanton and the other mayoral candidates in Phoenix be part of a forum tomorrow evening at Phoenix College.

From OneCommunity.co -

Phoenix is a minority-majority city, it is imperative that our next Mayor communicates with our diverse communities. Bring your questions and join us for “A Multicultural Conversation with the Candidates for Mayor" on April 19, 2011 from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. in the Bulpitt Auditorium at Phoenix College. The format will include two general questions for each candidate and conclude with questions fielded from the audience.

A Multicultural Conversation with the Candidates for Mayor is presented by Phoenix College, ONE Community, and the Maricopa Community Colleges. Event partners include Arizona Latino Research Enterprise, Arizona Progress, Arizona Small Business Association, Arizona Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, Arizona Informant, Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc., Echo Magazine, Greater Phoenix Black Chamber of Commerce, Greater Phoenix Urban League, Human Rights Campaign, Latino Perspectives Magazine, Local First Arizona, 'N Touch News Magazine, National Association of Asian American Professionals, National Association of Real Estate Brokers, Native American Connections, National Black MBA Association, Inc. Phoenix Chapter, Univision, and Valle del Sol. The forum will be taped and re-broadcast on the Maricopa Community College Television Station – MCTV.

Stanton is the one outstanding candidate in a field filled with tea baggers, corporate hacks, and pretenders.  If you want to take my word for, take the opportunity to see all of the candidates in one place.  Phoenix college is a cool place, and it's easy to get to from the freeway.

Phoenix College Bulpitt Auditorium


1202 West Thomas Road

Phoenix, AZ
April 19, 2011 - 5:30pm - 7:30pm

Sine Die on Tuesday?

MSM outlets like the Arizona Capitol Times and the Arizona Republic are reporting that Senate President Russell Pearce has said that the lege could adjourn its 2011 regular session tomorrow.

From the Republic story (from AP) -

Senate President Russell Pearce says the Arizona Legislature could end its 2011 regular session as soon as Tuesday.

Pearce offered his estimate after the conclusion of the first of several Senate floor sessions expected to be held Monday.

In honor of that plan/scheme/dream, the House is holding a marathon floor session right now, and the Senate is scheduled to begin a floor session tomorrow morning at 8:30 a.m., a full five hours earlier than the normal start time for a floor session.

If you want to be bored (they're just voting, with no debate or "explanations of votes) right now, go to this page and click on "View Live Proceedings."

Arizona legislature week in review and preview of the upcoming week

This is a long post, so grab a beer (or your favorite beverage of choice) before settling down to read this one... :)

As the legislative session enters its (expected) final days, they're getting ever more creative in the ways they push through their favored bits of legislation.

From this week's Farley Report, courtesy State. Rep. Steve Farley (courtesy Blog for Arizona):

Let me review for you some of the many ways bills can pass during the dramatic last couple of weeks of our session. All of these methods can happen all at once, creating a dizzying array of dangerous bills coming at us from all angles at blazing speed with virtually no public input. We may not be fully aware of what happened during this crazy time until weeks later. Here's just four bill enactment strategies being used right now:

1) The "simple" old fashioned way -- a bill is introduced in the House by a House member, heard in committee, passed through Rules and Committee of the Whole (COW) on the floor, and voted on in Third Read. Then that process starts over in the Senate. If it gets through the Senate unamended, it travels to the Governor for her signature or veto.

2) As a striker in committee -- The bill in example #1 can be replaced by an entirely different bill in a committee hearing -- often one that had stalled somewhere else in the process. This can be a shortcut to get around a certain legislator who may stand in the way. These can sneak up on you with little warning.

3) As an amendment to a germane bill on the floor in COW -- If a bill with an appropriate subject can be found in COW, a member can amend a bill of a similar topic to that bill so they both travel along their journey together. This happens with much greater frequency in the last couple of weeks as legislators frantically try to save bills that are otherwise on life support. Floor amendments are sometimes not available until a half hour before they are debated in floor, and can get lost in the competing noise of other amendments, so they can slip by nearly unnoticed.

4) As a conference committee amendment -- If that bill in example #1 gets amended in the Senate, it has to come back over to the House for the sponsor to either concur or refuse the amendments. If the sponsor concurs, the bill goes to Final Read and is sent to the Governor. If the sponsor refuses, however, the bill goes to a Conference Committee wherein much mischief can happen. Conference Committees have no notice requirements, and are made up of four Republicans and two Democrats. The deal is already done by the four Republicans before the gavel comes down, and the voting happens with little discussion and less testimony.

This past week, #3, the floor amendment in COW, was used a number of times.

- SB1080 passed the House almost unanimously - 55 in favor, 1 opposed (Democrat  Daniel Patterson) and 4 absent.  Relatiing to statutes regarding custodial interference, it was amended twice on the floor of the House, by Republican Reps. Eddie Farnsworth and Terri Proud.  It looks relatively non-controversial, but because of the late amendments, it will need to return to the Senate for final approval.

- SB1195 passed the House 53 - 1 (Republican Judy Burges), 6 absent.  Relating to service companies, it was amended on the floor by Republican Nancy McLain.  It was also have to return to the Senate.

- SB1303 passed the House unanimously.  Relating to school dropout recovery, it was amended on the floor by Republican Nancy McLain and will need to return to the Senate.

- SB1186 passed the House unanimously after it was amended by Republicans Andy Tobin and Jack Harper.  It's basically a "technical corrections" bill relating to tax laws, though whenever Republicans are involved, we should all be a little leery.  It now goes to a conference committee as the original sponsor of the measure, Sen. Steve Yarbrough, didn't sign off on the changes made by the House.

- HB2237 passed the Senate unanimously after it was amended by Republican Rich Crandall.  It relates to joint technical educational districts (JTEDs) and determining student counts.  It returns to the House for final approval.


The above bills were pretty non-controversial and the amendments to them pretty much furthered the intent of the underlying measure.

For the following bills, that's not so true -

- HB2067 passed the Senate almost unanimously (3 Ds opposed) after it was amended by Republican Andy Biggs.  As originally crafted, it served to limit the ability of county boards of supervisors to form and run non-profit entities.  Biggs' amendment turned it into an attack on the Arizona Board of Regents' control of University Medical Center in Tucson.  Yup, Andy Biggs wants to take control of the hospital that saved the lives of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and many of the other victims of Jared Loughner's mass shooting and give it over to a bunch of political hacks.  It now goes to a conference committee to iron out differences.
- SB1313 passed the House by a 38 - 18 - 4 vote that was mostly party line (2 Rs crossed over, 4 Ds absent).  As originally crafted, it requires the voters of a county to approve the establishment of a public health district in that county.  Currently laws allows the county's board of supervisors to do so by a unanimous vote.  Republican Jack Harper, long a favorite of mine (for those readers unfamiliar with the concept, that last bit was sarcasm :) ) however, has amended the bill to mandate what sort of procurement procedures public health districts utilize.

Other bills that passed one or both chambers last week:

- HB2177, Arizona's "birther" bill, passed both the House and the Senate on party line votes.  It now sits on Jan Brewer's desk.  Expectations are that the state is going to need to issue an RFP for all of the pens she will use to sign it into law.

- HB2191, barring the award of punitive damages to undocumented immigrants for any reason, passed the House on a nearly party line vote (1 D crossed over).  It's on the governor's desk awaiting her signature.

- HB2002, barring school districts from expending money to join organizations that "attempt to influence the outcome of an election" passed the House on a party line vote after being amended in the Senate to remove an exemption for joining a chamber of commerce.  On the governor's desk.

- SB1169, taking the Board of Nursing's authority to decide scope of practice matters regarding abortion and giving it to the lege itself, gained final approval in the Senate on a party line vote.  On the governor's desk.

- SB1188, granting a perference in adoption to married heterosexual couples; single people have to jump through serious hoops, and same sex couples need not apply, passed the Senate on a party line vote.  Governor's desk.

- SB1453, creating a set of "rights" saying that parents have almost absolute authority* to control their children's school work - call it the "Algebra is the Devil's Work" bill - passed the Senate on a party line vote.  Signed by the governor on Friday.  * = This is a little over the top.  It allows parents to censor any course material they consider to be too profane, vulgar, sexual, or violent.  On the other hand, you'd be surprised by how many people consider basic math or science to be objectionable.

- HB2565, creating a similar set of rights for post-secondary students, passed the Senate on a party line vote.  Back to the House for final approval.

- HB2193, relating to municipal wastewater charges, passed the Senate on a mostly party line vote (1 R and 2 Ds crossed over).  Back to the House for approval of Senate changes.

- HB2006, allowing firearms within game refuges, passed the Senate on a mostly party line vote (1 D crossing over, 1 D and 1 R absent).  Back to the House for approval of Senate changes.

- HB2102, barring the issuance of professional licenses or fingerprint clearance cards , passed the Senate on a party line vote.  Back to the House for a conference committee.  Republican nativist John Kavanagh is part of the conference, so there is a distinct possibility of serious mayhem here.

- SB1116, barring the state's universities from establishing or participating in institutes that advocate specific public policies, passed the Senate on a party line vote.  Looks to be targeted at ASU's Morrison Institute for Public Policy and U of A's Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy.  On the governor's desk.

- SB1521, relating to the establishment of head injury and concussion policies for scholastic athletes, passed the Senate unanimously.  On the governor's desk.  Originally pushed by Democratic State Rep. Ben Arredondo, his proposal died because the Republicans liked it (mostly) but refused to move any measure that made a Democrat look good.  The Republicans in the Senate demanded that any version passed by them feature a Republican name as the primary sponsor.  Hence, SB1521 passed with Republican Rich Crandall as the lead sponsor.  On the governor's desk.

- SB1167, placing all sort of restrictions on legal challenges to the ballot status of measures referred to the ballot by the legislature, passed the Senate by a party line vote.  On the governor's desk.

- SB1201, a "firearms omnibus" bill, passed the Senate on a party line vote.  Ugly, and on the governor's desk.

- SB1472, mandating certain information be included in judicial retention election publicity pamphlets, passed the Senate on a party line vote.  On the governor's desk.

- SB1593, allowing out of state insurers to sell health insurance in Arizona and not be subject to Arizona regulations (what few there are), passed the Senate on a party line vote.  On the governor's desk.

- SB1598, restricting the ability of municipalities and counties to regulate within their jurisdictions, passed the Senate by a mostly party line vote (1 D crossed over).

- SB1166, exempting corporate self-leases from sales tax, passed the House on a mostly party line vote (1 R crossed over).  On the governor's desk.

- SB1171, mandating that Pima County transfer any county-owned and operated sewage facilities located in Marana to Marana , passed the House by a mostly party line vote (4 Rs crossed over).  On the governor's desk.

- SB1326,  making the Gadsden flag, the "Don't Tread On Me" flag commandeered by the tea party movement as its symbol, exempt from HOA regulations, passed the House on a mostly party line vote (1 D crossed over).  On the governor's desk.

- SB1592, directing the governor to enter into a new Confederacy alliance/interstate compact regarding health care, passed the House on a party line vote.


That's a lot of [insert your own perjorative term here], and the coming week should be even crazier -

On Monday's House Third Read (final passage) Calendar -

- SB1088, amended in House COW to become a new Confederacy alliance/interstate compact act related to health care.  Will need to return to the Senate when passed by the House.

- SB1200, serving to reduce the use of ignition interlock systems for drivers convicted on DUI.  Amended on the House floor by Republican Vic Williams here and here, so it will need to return to the Senate when passed by the House.

- SB1226, limiting the ability of municipalities to levy secondary property taxes.  This was part of a committee striker in the House, so it will need to return to the Senate for them to approve the changes.

- SB1334, allowing hunting within city limits and barring municipalities from regulating it.  Amended on the House floor by Republicans Eddie Farnsworth and Amanda Reeve, so it will need to return to the Senate after passage by the House.

- SB1357, creating a $25 fee that must be paid by AHCCCS patients for missed appointments before they can make another appointment with a doctor/health care provider.  Also, there's a provision that would allow political subdivisions (counties, municipalities, etc.) to pony up the necessary money for health care to qualify for federal matching funds.  There's nothing in it to say where those subdivisions will find the money, but that's just a minor detail, right?

- SB1365, barring, under most circumstances, payroll deductions for political purposes.  Aimed at unions.  Amended on the House floor by Republican Andy Tobin, so it will need to return to the Senate for approval of the changes.

- SB1406, relating to a new Confederacy alliance/interstate compact relating to the construction of a fence across the border with Mexico.  Amended on the House floor by Republican Russ Jones to create a border security commission designed only to include nativist sheriffs such as Joe Arpaio and Paul Babeu.  When passed by the House, will need to return to the Senate.

- SB1465, barring the acceptance of consular-issued cards as valid identification.  Doesn't look to have been amended, so it will go to the governor upon passage.

- SB1495, establishing an armed military force separate from the national guard, answerable only to the Governor of Arizona, and funded by money siphoned from the national guard.  Goes to the governor upon passage.


The Senate's Third Read Calendar for Monday is here.

The Senate Rules Committee will meet on Monday at 11:15 a.m. in Caucus Room 1.  They'll be seeking permission for the late introduction of a bill relating to "Arizona Ombudsman-Citizens' Aide."  Has a similar basic title as HB2382, which never moved forward.  It was sponsored by Democrats.  However, the text of the late bill hasn't been posted as yet, so it may be a totally different measure.

If the measure is introduced, it will be heard in Senate Government Reform on Monday at 4 p.m or upon adjournment of the floor session, in SHR1.



Other events this week: 

The Legislature's Capitol Events calendar is here.  Tone-deaf highlight of the week:  Just a few weeks after the revelations that Fiesta Bowl lobbyists plied legislators with laundered campaign contributions and junkets to college football games, legislators and lobbyists are getting together Monday to party play a game of softball in honor of a late lobbyist.

The Arizona Capitol Times' Capitol Calendar is here.

Whew!

Top Secret!

Know the definition of "good" satire? 

You read it and think "this could really be true."

This is VERY good.


By Brent Abrahamson, of The Massachusetts Observer.  Gratefully reprinted with permission.

For Your Eyes Only


Gentlemen, thank you for joining me here today. For obvious reasons, I must ask that no notes of any kind be taken during our discussions. Recording devices of any kind are prohibited. Before you leave, you will pass through a scanner to ascertain that you have complied with our requests. Cell phones, of course, were to have been left outside this boardroom. Any questions before we begin? Good.


Now, Gentlemen, we know the problem. Our laboring class only has a certain number of productive years. Beyond that, they become a burden. As we plan for the future, we must capitalize on labor’s productive years while reducing each laborer’s longevity. Only then can we realize the maximum profits our shareholders demand.


Fortunately, we have greatly improved the landscape with our Tea Party promotions. This was a brilliant idea. Through strategic financing we have created what appears to be a grass roots movement from among the laboring class itself. There has been some minor vocal opposition, but this can be handled. Our advertizing folks tell us that just a bit of tweaking will make the Tea Partiers emerge as the voices of reason, the voices of morality, the voices of fiscal restraint, and the voices of patriotism. This is perfect.


It is therefore imperative, Gentlemen, that every proposal have those four elements. Each proposal must be seen as being reasonable, moral, fiscally responsible, and patriotic. And from our point of view, Gentlemen, each proposal must raise labor’s productivity while reducing labor’s longevity. When Wall Street teams up with Madison Avenue, nothing is impossible.


Here’s an example. Think tobacco. Think smoking. We need to reverse our policies here. We know, Gentlemen, that cigarette smoking can reduce the lifespan of the participant; yet public money is spent trying to get people to quit smoking. This works at cross-purposes with our goal, Gentlemen. The good news is that we can reverse this.


First, we must drop all taxes on cigarettes and other tobacco products. This will be seen as a victory for freedom. Then we must subsidize our tobacco industry so that buying a pack of cigarettes will be possible for even the poorest laborer. We must eliminate any age restriction on its purchase and use. And, Gentlemen, we must repeal restrictions on where the product may be used. It must be welcomed in restaurants and bars and clubs. Faculty rooms, break rooms. Anywhere people gather. Now some of you Gentlemen may be objecting that you might be subject to this second-hand smoke. Think about it for a moment, Gentlemen. You aren’t going to be going to those places and the places that you do frequent are out of labor’s price range.


We must allow for free enterprise by removing all restrictions on advertising cigarettes. Smoking must be “sold” in a variety of ways. It’s fun. It’s sexy. It’s macho. It’s for the modern woman. Above all, it is patriotic. Americans will be supporting an American industry.


People who are anti-smoking are anti-American. No public funds may be expended to determine health effects because we have already settled the case. Smoking is American. It’s cheap. It’s a way to help your country while helping yourself.


Don’t you see, Gentlemen, how perfect this is? When we couple this with no access to real health care, we can’t lose. (note: We need to allow free access to euthanasia. We must sell this option as “patriotic” and as a “family value.” “Lingering on robs your kids”).


This is only one example of so much more we can do, Gentlemen. I hope you great thinkers will get things rolling. The time to strike is now. Here’s a toast, Gentlemen. Long live our class.


©2011 The Massachusetts Observer

Guest Column: Stop! Thief!

Written by friend of the blog, and friend of the blogger, Jerry Gettinger.

Stop! Thief!

They are stealing from your children. I mean they are taking away an important item from your child. Why aren’t you angry? If you came home one night after seeing a movie and discovered that your new flat screen TV had been taken by a thief, you probably would be quite angry. You would be even angrier if you found out that the person who took the TV was the same person you asked to watch your house while you were out that evening.


In a manner of speaking, that is what is happening to your child. They are taking away his or her knowledge that they will most surely need when they have to compete against those whose parents didn’t allow anything to be taken from their children. Why have you allowed them to do what they said they would not do…take your children’s education away. Oh sure, the schools are still open. But they are rapidly becoming warehouses where young people go to spend a day trying to get the teacher’s attention because they didn’t have a solution to a problem. 35 kids in a kindergarten classroom! What a nightmare!


What did they do with the money that they took from our children? They gave some to a sheriff to use to defend his county against illegal immigrants. Oh, by the way, his county isn’t on the border. They also gave Sheriff Joe some of that money to rescue a dog. I’m not against dogs; it’s just that we need to get our priorities straight.


My children are grown. I had six and they all received a good education. It shows now that they are adults. They are able to compete for good jobs, they learned how to reason and arrive at conclusions that aid them in making decisions. Sure, I paid higher taxes. But they went to school with a pencil box and 4 pencils. Everything else was supplied.


Think about it. They have taken from your children an education, they have taken the ability to compete, and most of all, and they have stolen the ability to reason.




Why aren’t you angry? You elected these people to represent you and what they did was take from you and yours. Why aren’t you angry?


Somebody yell “stop thief!”