Showing posts with label satire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label satire. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Top Secret!

Know the definition of "good" satire? 

You read it and think "this could really be true."

This is VERY good.


By Brent Abrahamson, of The Massachusetts Observer.  Gratefully reprinted with permission.












For Your Eyes Only


Gentlemen, thank you for joining me here today. For obvious reasons, I must ask that no notes of any kind be taken during our discussions. Recording devices of any kind are prohibited. Before you leave, you will pass through a scanner to ascertain that you have complied with our requests. Cell phones, of course, were to have been left outside this boardroom. Any questions before we begin? Good.


Now, Gentlemen, we know the problem. Our laboring class only has a certain number of productive years. Beyond that, they become a burden. As we plan for the future, we must capitalize on labor’s productive years while reducing each laborer’s longevity. Only then can we realize the maximum profits our shareholders demand.


Fortunately, we have greatly improved the landscape with our Tea Party promotions. This was a brilliant idea. Through strategic financing we have created what appears to be a grass roots movement from among the laboring class itself. There has been some minor vocal opposition, but this can be handled. Our advertizing folks tell us that just a bit of tweaking will make the Tea Partiers emerge as the voices of reason, the voices of morality, the voices of fiscal restraint, and the voices of patriotism. This is perfect.


It is therefore imperative, Gentlemen, that every proposal have those four elements. Each proposal must be seen as being reasonable, moral, fiscally responsible, and patriotic. And from our point of view, Gentlemen, each proposal must raise labor’s productivity while reducing labor’s longevity. When Wall Street teams up with Madison Avenue, nothing is impossible.


Here’s an example. Think tobacco. Think smoking. We need to reverse our policies here. We know, Gentlemen, that cigarette smoking can reduce the lifespan of the participant; yet public money is spent trying to get people to quit smoking. This works at cross-purposes with our goal, Gentlemen. The good news is that we can reverse this.


First, we must drop all taxes on cigarettes and other tobacco products. This will be seen as a victory for freedom. Then we must subsidize our tobacco industry so that buying a pack of cigarettes will be possible for even the poorest laborer. We must eliminate any age restriction on its purchase and use. And, Gentlemen, we must repeal restrictions on where the product may be used. It must be welcomed in restaurants and bars and clubs. Faculty rooms, break rooms. Anywhere people gather. Now some of you Gentlemen may be objecting that you might be subject to this second-hand smoke. Think about it for a moment, Gentlemen. You aren’t going to be going to those places and the places that you do frequent are out of labor’s price range.


We must allow for free enterprise by removing all restrictions on advertising cigarettes. Smoking must be “sold” in a variety of ways. It’s fun. It’s sexy. It’s macho. It’s for the modern woman. Above all, it is patriotic. Americans will be supporting an American industry.


People who are anti-smoking are anti-American. No public funds may be expended to determine health effects because we have already settled the case. Smoking is American. It’s cheap. It’s a way to help your country while helping yourself.


Don’t you see, Gentlemen, how perfect this is? When we couple this with no access to real health care, we can’t lose. (note: We need to allow free access to euthanasia. We must sell this option as “patriotic” and as a “family value.” “Lingering on robs your kids”).


This is only one example of so much more we can do, Gentlemen. I hope you great thinkers will get things rolling. The time to strike is now. Here’s a toast, Gentlemen. Long live our class.


©2011 The Massachusetts Observer

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Klein, Pearce, and letters

Last week, State Sen. Lori Klein uttered one of the most bigoted speeches in the history of the Arizona Legislature, which is saying something.  As near as I can tell, the only bit of nativist stereotyping and propaganda that she didn't trot out was "headless bodies in the desert."

Here's the video, courtesy blogger Three Sonorans of the Tucson Citizen -





Apparently, the phenomenon purportedly witnessed by the author of Klein's letter (because she read it, I'm calling it "Klein's" even though copies of the letter that were released to the media show that it was addressed directly to Senate President Russell Pearce, who has a documented history with bigoted missives) isn't confined to public school classrooms in the West Valley.

In the aftermath of Klein's speech, an anonymous reader sent me the following, recounting his/her (it's anonymous, remember?  :) ) own eerily similar, yet different, experience* -
Dear Senator Pearce,

I am compelled to write to you about a recent event that occurred to me.

I currently work as a substitute teacher in private schools in the East Valley area of Scottsdale, Mesa and Chandler.  I was called upon to teach history and language arts for 8th grade at a Scottsdale private school. The number of students I had in each class ranged from 8 to 18 children, which were almost all White Republican and a couple of Athletic Scholarship/Quota children.   The day started out as usual turning on the television listening and watching the announcements on Fox News and saying the Pledge of Allegiance.  During the Pledge of Allegiance I notice the vast majority of students refusing to stand and say the pledge to the Flag of the United States of America.

I asked the students why they refused to say the Pledge of Allegiance and they responded by saying, “we are Arizonans and the U.S. government won't keep Brown People off of our properties and the properties in the same time zone as our properties.”  They finally rose and recited the tea party pledge when one of the students stood in front of the class holding the morning's issue of the Wall Street Journal over his head.

The teacher’s instructions were for the students to read a few pages and answer the questions regarding Mark Twain in their history textbook and to finish their final drafts to you, Senator Russell Pearce, thanking you for your position on Illegal Immigration rights. Their teacher apparently had showed them a video with you and Lou Dobbs.

Most of the students came unprepared for class, yelling that Twain was a commie pinko radical RINO, and their parents objected to all course material pertaining to him.  They texted messages to their nannies, demanding their chauffeurs come to the school to smack me around for even thinking that Twain was worthy of study.  They then held an informal debate over who was the greatest American writer of all time, settling on a choice of two - Ayn Rand and William L. Pierce.

The students’ final drafts to you that I read were basically the same. Most of them stated they were in the country only until their parents could send them to boarding schools overseas, poor and middle class Americans are lazy, and that they deserve everything that their parents and grandparents earned.

I mentioned that I and my wife are "middle class" and we both work, so how could we be lazy?  The students retorted that meant that in addition to being lazy, we were also stupid - we should have inherited wealth like any real American.

I asked them to stop texting in class, that it was impolite to ignore the teacher.  Their response was to advise me to learn to like it, because in a few years, I would be working for them.

When it came to completing the Mark Twain assignment only 2 students (the Quota students, naturally) completed it out of all my classes. Most of the students refused to open the book, tore the pages out of the book, or threw the textbooks at me. I thought are these the students we are trying to educate with STO tax credits?  I have found that substitute teaching in these areas most of the spoiled students do not want to be educated but rather grow up to be banksters and cross-burners. They hate America and are determined to turn our democratic republic into a feudal aristocracy.  Removing the brats from our schools would reduce our class sizes and the students who wanted to learn would have a better chance to do so and become productive citizens.

I urge you to make efforts to stop this destruction of American society.

When the citizens of a country are forced to kiss the brats' rear ends, adopt their customs, and forced to support them, are we not a conquered  nation?  I do not want to see our state and nation turned into something out of the Dark Ages. Thank you for standing up to this intellectual and spiritual virus.  You may contact me by phone, e-mail, or mail.


Thank you, again.

Sincerely,
 * - Not really.  This is just satire.  No such letter was sent to me.  Not all Hispanic children are gang members or wannabes.  Not all children of Republicans are spoiled arrogant snots. 

This was made up just to make a point - The letter to Pearce has no place in public discourse, and Senators Klein and Pearce should apologize for spouting that hate-filled drivel, and pledge to never utilize a taxpayer-funded platform to so spout ever again.


BTW - I don't have any direct evidence that the original letter wasn't genuinely sent to Pearce/Klein by an outside writer, but any teacher who writes that poorly, well, the college that awarded him/her a degree should have its accreditation revoked.  This whole thing reeks of a plant.

Thursday, August 21, 2008

Short Attention Span Musing

- Challenger Ed Hermes (D-SD1) is doing almost embarrassingly well against long-time (but never-challenged) incumbent Maricopa County Supervisor Fulton Brock (R).

According to their latest campaign finance reports, Hermes raised $27301.65 in the period from July 1 thru August 13.

Brock raised $6910 , or a little more than 1/4 as much.

The situation has gotten so desperate for Brock that some of the Rep bloggers have taken to criticizing Hermes on his age (24) while ignoring Hermes' experience (State Board of Regents, Arizona Department of Agriculture, Governor Napolitano's Smart Growth Cabinet).

The planted stories aren't doing anything to enhance their credibility or their candidate's.


- In a moment that shows just how out of touch he is with the average American, John McCain forgot how many houses he and his wife own (John: Seven.)

Yes, in an era when too many Americans are wondering how they can keep their one home, McCain has so many that he's forgetting them.


- In all of the hubbub over the soon-to-be-announced nominees for VP, the MSM and both campaigns are ignoring the simple fact that unless the VP ascends to the presidency, no one outside of his/her family members will care who the VP was after the term is over.

Most of the hype is due to the fact that it is political silly season - it's after the primaries and before the conventions. There's note a lot going on other than the occasional press release, so there just isn't much for the MSM to cover. Plus, the VP hype gives the campaigns some free publicity. Always a good thing, even when a campaign is operating on a Presidential campaign budget instead of, say, a school board candidate's budget.


...It really has been a long couple of days, so it is time for sleep.

Later!

Thursday, September 27, 2007

Some Democrats stepped up during Wednesday's debate...

...and others were eliminated from contention (with a couple of others treading water)...

All this happened on one question. :))

Warning: sarcasm ahead...

Governor Bill Richardson, former Sen. John Edwards, former Sen. Mike Gravel, and Sen. Chris Dodd showed that they are intelligent, wise, and undeniably classy; any would be fine choice for the Presidency.

Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Joe Biden showed that they are morally, intellectually, and mentally unfit for the Presidency.

Sen. Barack Obama and Rep. Dennis Kucinich showed that the jury is still out - they didn't show the wisdom of Richardson, Edwards, Gravel, and Dodd, but there were extenuating circumstances.

How can we arrive at these conclusions, with months of campaigning ahead before the first primaries and caucuses?

The candidates were asked if they rooted for the Red Sox or the Yankees.

Richardson, Edwards, Gravel, and Dodd expressed support for the beloved Olde Towne Teame. (Whooo hoooo!!)

Clinton and Biden professed fealty to The Evil Empire. (Hiss boooo!!!)

Obama (IL) and Kucinich (OH) proclaimed their loyalty for the respective hometown teams. Not as good as rooting for the Red Sox, but wayyyyy better than being a Yankee fan.

Oh, those poor poor Clinton and Biden supporters - the primaries are months away, and their candidates have already committed a candidacy-killing gaffe.

:))

Thursday, March 29, 2007

George W. Bush more respected...

...than the Arizona Legislature.

Thanks to Sonoran Sam for the heads-up on this in a comment on Tedski's Rum, Romanism, and Rebellion.

From a press release from the Behavior Research Center's Rocky Mountain Poll:

Percentage of those Arizonans polled who believe that George W. Bush is doing an excellent or good job -

32%

Percentage of those Arizonans polled who believe that the Arizona legislature is doing an excellent or good job -

28%

Somehow, I can't see either Bush or the Republican leadership at the lege being happy about this comparison.
*Low-level White House staffer: "Mr. President, great news! Things are looking up! The latest poll shows that you are even more well-respected than the legislature in Arizona!"

*President: "That is good news, but I'm going to wait for next week's poll, the one that checks to see if I'm finally more popular than a root canal, before I start crowing about my growing popularity."

Meanwhile, in Arizona...
*Republican leader #1: "Wow!! Look at this! The people really love us! We're only four points less popular than the President!"

*Republican leader #2: "Eat that, Janet! We RULE!!"

*The sane Republican in the lege: "Umm...Guys? Bush has run the highest deficits in American history; led us into a seemingly endless war, a war based on lies; has multiple advisers under indictment or investigation; and is known for routinely disregarding the rule of law. He's historically unpopular, and yet he *still* garners more respect than we do."

*Republican leaders #1 and #2 look at each other for a moment, then start doing the Snoopy dance and singing "We're only four points behind the President!!"

OK, so maybe it won't bother the Reps all that much. :)

Note: Any line marked by a "*" is pure satire and the product of the author's imagination; to the best of the author's knowledge, the above conversations have not taken place, nor is there any evidence that the Republican leadership in the lege has any knowledge of Snoopy or dancing.

Later!