Rep. Doug Quelland (R-LD10) has been repeatedly ordered to vacate his office due to violations of Clean Elections rules. He has appealed each decision against him (and is appealing the latest one, which is why he is still in office) and whether he ultimately leaves office or not, he is running for an LD10 State Rep slot this year.
When he is not expending energy on his efforts to fight Clean Elections' rulings against him, Quelland is using his remaining time in office to interfere with the Citizens Clean Elections Commission (CCEC). Not really representing his district's interests, but that is just a minor detail, right?
So far this session, he has introduced -
HB2588, forcing the CE Commission to turn over evidence from a complainant to a participating candidate within one day (that period of time seems to be awfully short);
HB2589, allowing the CCEC to assess attorney's fees against a complainant when a complaint is found to be false or evidence submitted is fraudulent (OK, this one doesn't seem to be too bad on the face of it);
HB2590, requiring that CCEC advise candidates in every publication that participating candidates have due process and evidentiary discovery rights (Another one that doesn't seem to be too bad at first glance);
HB2591, barring the AG's office from representing the CCEC in an action against a participating candidate (this one has the odor of some serious rancidness wafting from it - removing the ability of CCEC to use the AG's office as its cousel in enforcement actions means that they will have to expend scarce resources on outside counsel);
HB2592, giving defendants in CCEC enforcement actions the same discovery and disclosure procedures and standards as set forth in Arizona's Rules of Civil Procedure (I don't know enough about Civil Procedure to have a comment here).
Think Quelland is still p!$$ed over losing his case, over and over again?
Monday, January 25, 2010
Well, they won't have Pam Gorman to kick around any more...
FYI - Pam Gorman is the Republican state senator from LD6 (Anthem), and "they" refers to her own caucus and leadership in the State Senate.
From AZCentral.com's Political Insider -
The timing of this actually isn't a surprise.
A vacancy in the Senate during this part of the session of the lege doesn't mean much as there probably won't be any significant votes (aka - "budget stuff") any time soon. Her replacement will be from a list of three nominated by the Republican PCs in her district and approved by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, who will most likely just rubber-stamp the choice of the supe from that part of the county (Andy Kunasek, I think).
Expect similar moves from the other sitting officeholders running in the CD3 Republican primary (State Sen. Jim Waring of LD7, State Rep. Sam Crump of LD6, Paradise Valley Mayor Vernon Parker, and possibly State Rep. Adam Driggs of LD11, whose name was floated by the AZRepublic this weekend.)
From AZCentral.com's Political Insider -
Pamela Gorman made it official Monday, becoming the first Arizona lawmaker to resign the Legislature in pursuit of the District 3 congressional seat.
Gorman, an Anthem Republican, sent a brief and straight-forward letter to Senate President Bob Burns -- a marked departure from some of her earlier and somewhat preachy missives to the Senate GOP leadership.
{snip}
Gorman's departure, one Capitol wag observed, probably puts her back on Gov. Jan Brewer's Christmas-card list. Gorman held out against one-on-one lobbying from Brewer as the governor pressed for Gorman's "yes" vote on a sales-tax hike.
Gorman's opposition to that tax hike put her at odds with the direction of Senate leadership, prompting her to resign her majority-whip position last year.
The timing of this actually isn't a surprise.
A vacancy in the Senate during this part of the session of the lege doesn't mean much as there probably won't be any significant votes (aka - "budget stuff") any time soon. Her replacement will be from a list of three nominated by the Republican PCs in her district and approved by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, who will most likely just rubber-stamp the choice of the supe from that part of the county (Andy Kunasek, I think).
Expect similar moves from the other sitting officeholders running in the CD3 Republican primary (State Sen. Jim Waring of LD7, State Rep. Sam Crump of LD6, Paradise Valley Mayor Vernon Parker, and possibly State Rep. Adam Driggs of LD11, whose name was floated by the AZRepublic this weekend.)
More candidate committees forming
This post will focus mostly on Maricopa County races (and then mostly on the Scottsdale/Tempe area) because there haven't been any significant changes in state-level races since the last post on this topic. This is *not* meant to be a comprehensive list -
- Andy Yates (R) of Scottsdale has filed for the Board of Directors of the Central Arizona Water Conservation District (aka - Central Arizona Project)
- Mark Anderson (R) of Mesa, a former state legislator and candidate for Congress, has filed for the West Mesa Justice of the Peace slot (R incumbent)
- Michael Stauffer (R) of Cave Creek, a lieutenant with the Scottsdale PD, has filed for a run for Sheriff. An office which, to the best of my knowledge, isn't on this year's ballot. Not yet, anyway.
- Tim Bray (R) of Scottsdale has filed for a run at CAP Director
- Charles Boles (R) of Tempe has filed for a run at the University Lakes JP spot. The R incumbent here, John Ore, has become Joe Arpaio's go-to guy when Arpaio needs to find someone to sign search warrants filed against Superior Court-level judges who find themselves on Arpaio's $h!t list.
- Guy Phillips (R) of Scottsdale, a contractor, has filed for a run at Scottsdale City Council
In terminated committee news, Vernon Parker, formerly an R candidate for governor and currently a candidate for the CD3 seat held by the soon-to-retire John Shadegg, has closed his "Save Our Jobs: Stop the Tax Hike" committee (filer ID 201000350). Since this committee was set up as a conduit for third-party expenditures in the governor's race, there is no reason to continue it now that its founder is running for a federal office.
Later...
- Andy Yates (R) of Scottsdale has filed for the Board of Directors of the Central Arizona Water Conservation District (aka - Central Arizona Project)
- Mark Anderson (R) of Mesa, a former state legislator and candidate for Congress, has filed for the West Mesa Justice of the Peace slot (R incumbent)
- Michael Stauffer (R) of Cave Creek, a lieutenant with the Scottsdale PD, has filed for a run for Sheriff. An office which, to the best of my knowledge, isn't on this year's ballot. Not yet, anyway.
- Tim Bray (R) of Scottsdale has filed for a run at CAP Director
- Charles Boles (R) of Tempe has filed for a run at the University Lakes JP spot. The R incumbent here, John Ore, has become Joe Arpaio's go-to guy when Arpaio needs to find someone to sign search warrants filed against Superior Court-level judges who find themselves on Arpaio's $h!t list.
- Guy Phillips (R) of Scottsdale, a contractor, has filed for a run at Scottsdale City Council
In terminated committee news, Vernon Parker, formerly an R candidate for governor and currently a candidate for the CD3 seat held by the soon-to-retire John Shadegg, has closed his "Save Our Jobs: Stop the Tax Hike" committee (filer ID 201000350). Since this committee was set up as a conduit for third-party expenditures in the governor's race, there is no reason to continue it now that its founder is running for a federal office.
Later...
IOKIYAR as an editorial standard
On Saturday, both the Arizona Democratic Party and the Arizona Republican Party held meetings of their respective state committees in Phoenix. As such gatherings are wont to be, both were exercises in energizing party activists as well as allowing candidates to "meet and greet" activists and to recruit supporters for their campaigns.
Very rarely does one see substantive policy initiatives trotted out in these conditions. That's just not their raison d'etre.
Apparently, however, the editors at the Arizona Capitol Times, a publication almost exclusively devoted to covering politics in Arizona, are unfamiliar with this dynamic.
After the Democratic meeting, they published an article with the following lede (subscription login required) -
I've got no problem with criticisms of Democratic candidates when such criticisms are deserved.
And yes, Terry Goddard will eventually have to present a plan for addressing Arizona's needs.
However, Saturday afternoon wasn't "eventually" and holding Democrats to higher standards than they hold Republicans to doesn't exactly enhance the credibility of AZ Capitol Times, something they should consider in this time of plummeting newspaper circulations.
BTW - So will somebody tell me how having "It's OK If You're A Republican" as an editorial standard is evidence of that nearly-mythical "liberal bias" in the media? Or even evidence of professional journalism in the media?
Anybody?
Very rarely does one see substantive policy initiatives trotted out in these conditions. That's just not their raison d'etre.
Apparently, however, the editors at the Arizona Capitol Times, a publication almost exclusively devoted to covering politics in Arizona, are unfamiliar with this dynamic.
After the Democratic meeting, they published an article with the following lede (subscription login required) -
Terry Goddard didn’t produce any solutions for the problems facing the state, but he had a lot of harsh words for Gov. Jan Brewer and the Republican legislative leaders.On the other hand, while criticizing Terry Goddard, the current Attorney General, for not announcing ways to fix the budget mess in Arizona while at a non-policy event, they had no such criticism for the Republicans who also didn't promulgate any new policies at their party meeting, instead focusing on campaigns against one of their own and blaming "Sinema Democrats" for the budget mess that the Republicans in legislature have enthusiastically crafted, with the complicity of their governor.
I've got no problem with criticisms of Democratic candidates when such criticisms are deserved.
And yes, Terry Goddard will eventually have to present a plan for addressing Arizona's needs.
However, Saturday afternoon wasn't "eventually" and holding Democrats to higher standards than they hold Republicans to doesn't exactly enhance the credibility of AZ Capitol Times, something they should consider in this time of plummeting newspaper circulations.
BTW - So will somebody tell me how having "It's OK If You're A Republican" as an editorial standard is evidence of that nearly-mythical "liberal bias" in the media? Or even evidence of professional journalism in the media?
Anybody?
Sunday, January 24, 2010
The coming week...
As usual, all info gathered from the websites of the relevent political bodies/agencies, and subject to change without notice...
...In Congress, it will be a rather brief week due to the President's State of the Union address on Wednesday.
Possibly controversial items on the House's scheduled agenda -
- An as-yet-unnumbered bill titled "Emergency Aid to American Survivors of the Haiti Earthquake Act" from Rep. Charlie Rangel
- An as-yet-unnumbered bill regarding "additional temporary extension of programs under the Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958" from Rep. Nydia Velazquez
There won't be any business conducted in the House on Thursday and Friday so that the House Republicans may meet in an issues conference.
Over in the Senate, they'll be attending the State of the Union address with the members of the House, but before and after that, they'll be conducting business. Their committee schedule is here. There doesn't seem to be anything of specific interest to Arizona this week, though something could crop up.
...The committee schedule for the Arizona legislature was covered in a separate post here. There is one additional meeting to add: the Joint Committee on Capital Review will meet on Tuesday at 8 a.m. in HHR4.
...The Arizona Corporation Commission will be holding a Public Comment Meeting in Litchfield Park on Monday at 6:30 p.m. They will be soliciting public input on a rate increase request from Liberty Water, formerly known at Litchfield Park Service Co. ACC's full hearing schedule is here.
...The Citizens Clean Elections Commission will meet on Thursday at 9 a.m. No agenda posted as yet, but expect at least an informal discussion of the recent court ruling outlawing CE's matching funds provisions. (Note: CE is appealing the decision.)
...The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors will hold an informal meeting on Monday and a formal meeting on Wednesday (agenda available on this page).
...The Board of Directors of the Maricopa Integrated Health System will have a busy week -
- An executive session on Monday at 1 p.m.
- A formal meeting on Monday at 3 p.m.
- Another formal meeting on Wednesday at 1 p.m.
...The Governing Board of the Maricopa County Community College District will meet on Tuesday at 6:30 p.m., with an executive session at 5:30 p.m.
...The Tempe City Council's Calendar is here. No formal council meetings are scheduled for this week. However, since last week's meeting was postponed due to the weather issues in the area, it may be rescheduled for this week. Stay tuned.
...The Scottsdale City Council will have a busy Tuesday -
- A 3:30 p.m. Executive Session
- A 4 p.m. Special Meeting on Board and Commission appointments
- A 5 p.m. Regular Meeting, assuming that all will still be running according to schedule.
The City's Community Meeting Notice is here.
On Monday, the City's Charter Review Task Force will be meeting on Monday evening. An AZRepublic preview of the meeting is here.
Not meeting this week: Arizona Board of Regents, Board of Directors of the Central Arizona Project
...In Congress, it will be a rather brief week due to the President's State of the Union address on Wednesday.
Possibly controversial items on the House's scheduled agenda -
- An as-yet-unnumbered bill titled "Emergency Aid to American Survivors of the Haiti Earthquake Act" from Rep. Charlie Rangel
- An as-yet-unnumbered bill regarding "additional temporary extension of programs under the Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958" from Rep. Nydia Velazquez
There won't be any business conducted in the House on Thursday and Friday so that the House Republicans may meet in an issues conference.
Over in the Senate, they'll be attending the State of the Union address with the members of the House, but before and after that, they'll be conducting business. Their committee schedule is here. There doesn't seem to be anything of specific interest to Arizona this week, though something could crop up.
...The committee schedule for the Arizona legislature was covered in a separate post here. There is one additional meeting to add: the Joint Committee on Capital Review will meet on Tuesday at 8 a.m. in HHR4.
...The Arizona Corporation Commission will be holding a Public Comment Meeting in Litchfield Park on Monday at 6:30 p.m. They will be soliciting public input on a rate increase request from Liberty Water, formerly known at Litchfield Park Service Co. ACC's full hearing schedule is here.
...The Citizens Clean Elections Commission will meet on Thursday at 9 a.m. No agenda posted as yet, but expect at least an informal discussion of the recent court ruling outlawing CE's matching funds provisions. (Note: CE is appealing the decision.)
...The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors will hold an informal meeting on Monday and a formal meeting on Wednesday (agenda available on this page).
...The Board of Directors of the Maricopa Integrated Health System will have a busy week -
- An executive session on Monday at 1 p.m.
- A formal meeting on Monday at 3 p.m.
- Another formal meeting on Wednesday at 1 p.m.
...The Governing Board of the Maricopa County Community College District will meet on Tuesday at 6:30 p.m., with an executive session at 5:30 p.m.
...The Tempe City Council's Calendar is here. No formal council meetings are scheduled for this week. However, since last week's meeting was postponed due to the weather issues in the area, it may be rescheduled for this week. Stay tuned.
...The Scottsdale City Council will have a busy Tuesday -
- A 3:30 p.m. Executive Session
- A 4 p.m. Special Meeting on Board and Commission appointments
- A 5 p.m. Regular Meeting, assuming that all will still be running according to schedule.
The City's Community Meeting Notice is here.
On Monday, the City's Charter Review Task Force will be meeting on Monday evening. An AZRepublic preview of the meeting is here.
Not meeting this week: Arizona Board of Regents, Board of Directors of the Central Arizona Project
Saturday, January 23, 2010
The Coming Week: Legislative Edition
As usual, all info gathered from the website of the Arizona legislature, except where noted, and subject to change.
The lege has a very full committee schedule this week, so only the real highlights/lowlights will be specifically covered here.
OK, so it will be just lowlights. We're talking about the *Arizona* legislature, so there aren't any highlights. :)
Over in the House...
...The Rules Committee will meet on Monday at 1 p.m. in HHR4.
...The Ways and Means Committee will meet on Monday at 2 p.m. in HHR1. The "highlight" here is consideration of HB2250. The Rep authors of the piece have named it "Arizona's Job Recovery Act." I name it the "Arizona's Big Businesses Get HugeTax Gifts While Average Arizonans Get Shafted" Act. Legislative summary here.
...Natural Resources and Rural Affairs will meet Monday at 2 p.m. in HHR4. This agenda has HB2290, a scheme to dump discarded tires into abandoned mines, and HCR2008, Jerry Weiers' proposed amendment to the Arizona Constitution to protect Arizona's oppressed but avid hunters and fishermen.
...Education will meet on Monday at 2 p.m. in HHR3. The agenda includes the first "striker", or strike-everything amendment. The amendment would turn HB2127 into a measure pertaining to joint enrollment and funding apportionment between school districts and joint technical education districts (JTEDs). Legislative summary here.
...Banking and Insurance will meet on Monday at 2 p.m. in HHR5. The item of interest here is HB2161, Rep. Andy Tobin's (R-LD1) scheme to override the voters' decision to end payday loans in Arizona. Ugh.
...Public Employees, Retirement, and Entitlement Reform will meet on Tuesday at 2 p.m. in HHR3.
...Government will meet on Tuesday at 2 p.m. in HHR4. The nugget of nastiness here is HB2395, which would bar school boards from authorizing payroll deductions for teachers to pay union dues. Punitive payback for all of the rallies, letters, and phone calls organized by teachers in support of public education over the last year.
...Environment will meet on Tuesday at 2 p.m. in HHR5. Here they will consider HB2248, a bill to bar Arizona from participating in the Western Climate Initiative.
...Military Affairs and Public Safety will meet on Wednesday at 9 a.m. in HHR3. This one has a couple of bad bills up - HB2347, a massive loosening of gun laws, including the removal of any requirements of silly things like safety education for concealed weapons permit applicants/holders or that possessors of such a permit actually carry it on their persons when they are carrying a weapon, and HB2383, allowing the governor to declare a state of emergency in Arizona due to illegal immigration and upon such declaration, require that the National Guard be mobilized and deployed to the border with Mexico.
...Health and Human Services will meet on Wednesday at 9 a.m. in HHR4.
...Commerce will meet on Wednesday at 9 a.m. in HHR5. They will consider HB2228, allowing the state to outsource/privatize elevator safety inspections to "third party" inspectors (aka - corporations more interested in profit than safety...not that I'm cynical or anything :) ); HB2246, basically deregulating "consumer fireworks," aka "handy dandy finger removers"; HB2260, making it much tougher for a state agency to implement a new regulatory rule or even to maintain existing ones.
...Appropriations will meet on Wednesday at 2 p.m. in HHR1. It's early in the session, so the highlight of this agenda appears to be a couple of presentations, including one by JLBC.
...Water and Energy will meet on Thursday at 9 a.m. in HHR5.
...Transportation and Infrastructure will meet on Thursday at 9 a.m. in HHR3. On the agenda: HB2034, requiring stickers on gas pumps that list all state and federal taxes on a gallon of gas; and HB2338, micromanaging traffic lights and photo enforcement of the same at four-way intersections.
...Judiciary will meet on Thursday in HHR4. This one has HB2384, barring cities and counties from implementing "sanctuary city" (or "sanctuary county") policies and turning local law enforcement officials into ICE agents.
Over in the Senate...
...Rules will meet on Monday upon adjournment of the floor session in Caucus Room 1.
...Natural Resources, Infrastructure, and Public Debt will meet at 1:30 p.m. in SHR109.
...Judiciary will meet on Monday at 1:30 p.m. in SHR1. Their agenda is just chock full o' ugly from Russell Pearce this week. Let's see:
SB1021, which would make it legal for firearms possessors who feel scared enough of someone else to show their weapons (defensive display) to kill those who have scared them.
SB1098, which states that firearms manufactured and possessed in Arizona are exempt from federal laws. Wonder if any of the authors have asked the feds about this one?
SB1101, exempts current and former law enforcement officials from needing a permit to carry a concealed firearm. I can understand the allowance for active-duty personnel, but *former*? No.
SB1102, similar to HB2347 above.
SB1153, prohibits cities, towns, and counties from enacting laws governing the possession and use of knives (aka - no banning of them from city parks, schools, or government buildings).
...Commerce and Economic Development will meet Tuesday at 1:30 in SHR1.
...Appropriations will meet on Tuesday at 1:30 p.m. in SHR109. This one has more Pearce-spawned ugliness in the form of SB1103, forcing the Arizona Department of Corrections to purchase new prison beds that meet a specific pricing criteria before purchasing higher-priced beds. There's nothing in the bill about the new beds meeting any sort of building or health standards.
...Public Safety and Human Services will meet on Wednesday at 9 a.m. in SHR3.
...Healthcare and Medical Liability Reform will meet on Wednesday at 9 a.m. in SHR1.
...Finance will meet on Wednesday at 1:30 p.m. in SHR3.
...Education Acccountability and Reform will meet on Wednesday at 1:30 p.m. in SHR1. Proceedings will include consideration of SB1175, expanding the Governing Board of the Maricopa County Community College District to seven by adding two members elected countywide.
...Government Institutions will meet on Thursday at 10:30 a.m. in SHR1. This one has my nominee for "Worst Bill of the Week" - SB1100. This one would remove records related to audits of county officers from the realm of public records subject to public disclosure. This one is also from Russell Pearce. Apparently he is Joe Arpaio's personal state senator these days, because this one is set up to shield Arpaio's (mis)management of MCSO from public scrutiny.
If you are interested in one or more of the bills listed here or on any of the agendas, check the posted agendas for updates before traveling to the Capitol. Things are subject to change at the lege.
The lege has a very full committee schedule this week, so only the real highlights/lowlights will be specifically covered here.
OK, so it will be just lowlights. We're talking about the *Arizona* legislature, so there aren't any highlights. :)
Over in the House...
...The Rules Committee will meet on Monday at 1 p.m. in HHR4.
...The Ways and Means Committee will meet on Monday at 2 p.m. in HHR1. The "highlight" here is consideration of HB2250. The Rep authors of the piece have named it "Arizona's Job Recovery Act." I name it the "Arizona's Big Businesses Get HugeTax Gifts While Average Arizonans Get Shafted" Act. Legislative summary here.
...Natural Resources and Rural Affairs will meet Monday at 2 p.m. in HHR4. This agenda has HB2290, a scheme to dump discarded tires into abandoned mines, and HCR2008, Jerry Weiers' proposed amendment to the Arizona Constitution to protect Arizona's oppressed but avid hunters and fishermen.
...Education will meet on Monday at 2 p.m. in HHR3. The agenda includes the first "striker", or strike-everything amendment. The amendment would turn HB2127 into a measure pertaining to joint enrollment and funding apportionment between school districts and joint technical education districts (JTEDs). Legislative summary here.
...Banking and Insurance will meet on Monday at 2 p.m. in HHR5. The item of interest here is HB2161, Rep. Andy Tobin's (R-LD1) scheme to override the voters' decision to end payday loans in Arizona. Ugh.
...Public Employees, Retirement, and Entitlement Reform will meet on Tuesday at 2 p.m. in HHR3.
...Government will meet on Tuesday at 2 p.m. in HHR4. The nugget of nastiness here is HB2395, which would bar school boards from authorizing payroll deductions for teachers to pay union dues. Punitive payback for all of the rallies, letters, and phone calls organized by teachers in support of public education over the last year.
...Environment will meet on Tuesday at 2 p.m. in HHR5. Here they will consider HB2248, a bill to bar Arizona from participating in the Western Climate Initiative.
...Military Affairs and Public Safety will meet on Wednesday at 9 a.m. in HHR3. This one has a couple of bad bills up - HB2347, a massive loosening of gun laws, including the removal of any requirements of silly things like safety education for concealed weapons permit applicants/holders or that possessors of such a permit actually carry it on their persons when they are carrying a weapon, and HB2383, allowing the governor to declare a state of emergency in Arizona due to illegal immigration and upon such declaration, require that the National Guard be mobilized and deployed to the border with Mexico.
...Health and Human Services will meet on Wednesday at 9 a.m. in HHR4.
...Commerce will meet on Wednesday at 9 a.m. in HHR5. They will consider HB2228, allowing the state to outsource/privatize elevator safety inspections to "third party" inspectors (aka - corporations more interested in profit than safety...not that I'm cynical or anything :) ); HB2246, basically deregulating "consumer fireworks," aka "handy dandy finger removers"; HB2260, making it much tougher for a state agency to implement a new regulatory rule or even to maintain existing ones.
...Appropriations will meet on Wednesday at 2 p.m. in HHR1. It's early in the session, so the highlight of this agenda appears to be a couple of presentations, including one by JLBC.
...Water and Energy will meet on Thursday at 9 a.m. in HHR5.
...Transportation and Infrastructure will meet on Thursday at 9 a.m. in HHR3. On the agenda: HB2034, requiring stickers on gas pumps that list all state and federal taxes on a gallon of gas; and HB2338, micromanaging traffic lights and photo enforcement of the same at four-way intersections.
...Judiciary will meet on Thursday in HHR4. This one has HB2384, barring cities and counties from implementing "sanctuary city" (or "sanctuary county") policies and turning local law enforcement officials into ICE agents.
Over in the Senate...
...Rules will meet on Monday upon adjournment of the floor session in Caucus Room 1.
...Natural Resources, Infrastructure, and Public Debt will meet at 1:30 p.m. in SHR109.
...Judiciary will meet on Monday at 1:30 p.m. in SHR1. Their agenda is just chock full o' ugly from Russell Pearce this week. Let's see:
SB1021, which would make it legal for firearms possessors who feel scared enough of someone else to show their weapons (defensive display) to kill those who have scared them.
SB1098, which states that firearms manufactured and possessed in Arizona are exempt from federal laws. Wonder if any of the authors have asked the feds about this one?
SB1101, exempts current and former law enforcement officials from needing a permit to carry a concealed firearm. I can understand the allowance for active-duty personnel, but *former*? No.
SB1102, similar to HB2347 above.
SB1153, prohibits cities, towns, and counties from enacting laws governing the possession and use of knives (aka - no banning of them from city parks, schools, or government buildings).
...Commerce and Economic Development will meet Tuesday at 1:30 in SHR1.
...Appropriations will meet on Tuesday at 1:30 p.m. in SHR109. This one has more Pearce-spawned ugliness in the form of SB1103, forcing the Arizona Department of Corrections to purchase new prison beds that meet a specific pricing criteria before purchasing higher-priced beds. There's nothing in the bill about the new beds meeting any sort of building or health standards.
...Public Safety and Human Services will meet on Wednesday at 9 a.m. in SHR3.
...Healthcare and Medical Liability Reform will meet on Wednesday at 9 a.m. in SHR1.
...Finance will meet on Wednesday at 1:30 p.m. in SHR3.
...Education Acccountability and Reform will meet on Wednesday at 1:30 p.m. in SHR1. Proceedings will include consideration of SB1175, expanding the Governing Board of the Maricopa County Community College District to seven by adding two members elected countywide.
...Government Institutions will meet on Thursday at 10:30 a.m. in SHR1. This one has my nominee for "Worst Bill of the Week" - SB1100. This one would remove records related to audits of county officers from the realm of public records subject to public disclosure. This one is also from Russell Pearce. Apparently he is Joe Arpaio's personal state senator these days, because this one is set up to shield Arpaio's (mis)management of MCSO from public scrutiny.
If you are interested in one or more of the bills listed here or on any of the agendas, check the posted agendas for updates before traveling to the Capitol. Things are subject to change at the lege.
Friday, January 22, 2010
Massachusetts Special Election - Not exactly a rebuke to President Obama
Just a couple of interesting numbers -
Votes for John McCain, November 2008 - 1,108,154
Votes for Scott Brown, January 2010 - 1,168,107
Difference: 59,953
That number indicates that a major factor in Brown's victory was turnout problems for the Dems, driven, IMO, by a poor campaign effort from their candidate and the state party there.
Votes for John McCain, November 2008 - 1,108,154
Votes for Scott Brown, January 2010 - 1,168,107
Difference: 59,953
That number indicates that a major factor in Brown's victory was turnout problems for the Dems, driven, IMO, by a poor campaign effort from their candidate and the state party there.
PSA time - ADOT road closures
Straight from an email from ADOT -
CLOSURE UPDATE: Interstates 40 and 17 to Reopen Tonight; Safety Top Concern
Drivers: Be Cautions in Changing Conditions
PHOENIX – The Arizona Department of Transportation will reopen I-40 in both directions from Flagstaff at 7 p.m. Friday. The highway had been closed from Kingman to Winslow, a 180-mile stretch across Northern Arizona .
I-17 will reopen at the same time for southbound traffic only. On Saturday morning, I-17 northbound from the Sedona turnoff (State Route 179) is expected to open, allowing time for additional runoff to drain from the highway.
While these critical routes will be reopened to all traffic, drivers are warned of continued threatening conditions. Blowing snow, flurries, drifts, high winds, low visibility and water running across roadways have been reported on both highways. Drivers are urged to use caution and to limit trips when possible. Roadways are passable but conditions may change based on weather conditions. Drivers should also be alert to possible roadway damage and reduce travel speeds.
Both I-17 and I-40 were closed on Thursday afternoon when an intensive winter storm pounded the state, dropping more than two feet of snow. ADOT responded by actively working to assist motorists, support DPS officers and complete repairs and snow removal as quickly as possible. I-40 and I-17 are important corridors for state and national freight hauling, and are important routes for travelers. Because of this importance, ADOT applied all available resources to opening both highways as quickly as possible.
Heavy snow created unsafe conditions along both stretches of the interstate traveling to or through Flagstaff . ADOT and the Arizona Department of Public Safety worked together with local agencies to protect motorists, including commercial truck drivers, who easily could have become stranded or involved in crashes in the snow packed and icy conditions.
Other ADOT highways of note:
•State Route 87 closed (including off-road areas) between Bush Highway and State Route 188, south of Payson
•State Route 89a between Sedona and Flagstaff remains closed and is expected to reopen Saturday.
•State Route 260 closed between McNary and Eagar due to blowing and drifting snow.
•State Route 273 closed approaching Sunrise Ski Resort due to heavy snow.
For more information on travel conditions across the state, call 5-1-1 or visit www.az511.gov. For winter driving tips, visit www.azdot.gov/KnowSnow.
Non-weather related closures can be found here, but due to the weather impeding construction plans, the closures may change. Contact ADOT at the above number or websites to find out current info.
CLOSURE UPDATE: Interstates 40 and 17 to Reopen Tonight; Safety Top Concern
Drivers: Be Cautions in Changing Conditions
PHOENIX – The Arizona Department of Transportation will reopen I-40 in both directions from Flagstaff at 7 p.m. Friday. The highway had been closed from Kingman to Winslow, a 180-mile stretch across Northern Arizona .
I-17 will reopen at the same time for southbound traffic only. On Saturday morning, I-17 northbound from the Sedona turnoff (State Route 179) is expected to open, allowing time for additional runoff to drain from the highway.
While these critical routes will be reopened to all traffic, drivers are warned of continued threatening conditions. Blowing snow, flurries, drifts, high winds, low visibility and water running across roadways have been reported on both highways. Drivers are urged to use caution and to limit trips when possible. Roadways are passable but conditions may change based on weather conditions. Drivers should also be alert to possible roadway damage and reduce travel speeds.
Both I-17 and I-40 were closed on Thursday afternoon when an intensive winter storm pounded the state, dropping more than two feet of snow. ADOT responded by actively working to assist motorists, support DPS officers and complete repairs and snow removal as quickly as possible. I-40 and I-17 are important corridors for state and national freight hauling, and are important routes for travelers. Because of this importance, ADOT applied all available resources to opening both highways as quickly as possible.
Heavy snow created unsafe conditions along both stretches of the interstate traveling to or through Flagstaff . ADOT and the Arizona Department of Public Safety worked together with local agencies to protect motorists, including commercial truck drivers, who easily could have become stranded or involved in crashes in the snow packed and icy conditions.
Other ADOT highways of note:
•State Route 87 closed (including off-road areas) between Bush Highway and State Route 188, south of Payson
•State Route 89a between Sedona and Flagstaff remains closed and is expected to reopen Saturday.
•State Route 260 closed between McNary and Eagar due to blowing and drifting snow.
•State Route 273 closed approaching Sunrise Ski Resort due to heavy snow.
For more information on travel conditions across the state, call 5-1-1 or visit www.az511.gov. For winter driving tips, visit www.azdot.gov/KnowSnow.
Non-weather related closures can be found here, but due to the weather impeding construction plans, the closures may change. Contact ADOT at the above number or websites to find out current info.
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Tornado Warning issued for Maricopa County
No joking, and no politics.
A tornado warning has been issued in Maricopa County until 10 p.m.
Keep your flashlights and candles handy, and if a twister approaches your location, get into a bathtub (cast iron is preferable, but since this is 21st century AZ... :) ), and cover up with a blanket to protect against flying glass.
Pretty much everything significant has been closed for the night due to the weather, and tomorrow is iffy. Call ahead if your plans for Friday included flying out of Sky Harbor or attending the car auction.
Or attending anything else that doesn't include staying at home...
The rain is expected to continue on Friday, though the winds should (hopefully!) die down a little, with the rain possibly ending on Saturday.
A tornado warning has been issued in Maricopa County until 10 p.m.
Keep your flashlights and candles handy, and if a twister approaches your location, get into a bathtub (cast iron is preferable, but since this is 21st century AZ... :) ), and cover up with a blanket to protect against flying glass.
Pretty much everything significant has been closed for the night due to the weather, and tomorrow is iffy. Call ahead if your plans for Friday included flying out of Sky Harbor or attending the car auction.
Or attending anything else that doesn't include staying at home...
The rain is expected to continue on Friday, though the winds should (hopefully!) die down a little, with the rain possibly ending on Saturday.
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
The Mass. Mess: They got complacent and they got cute
Much is being made among the political chattering class (and most readers here and this writer are part of that group) of Republican Scott Brown's upset of Democrat Martha Coakley in the special election held in Massachusetts to fill the Senate seat once held by the late Ted Kennedy.
Many are saying that it was a referendum on President Barack Obama and plans for reforming health care in America (OK, "many" is shorthand "any Republican who can find a microphone").
There may have been some of that (I don't really think so, though, not in MA), but it was more a referendum on the campaign conducted by Martha Coakley and the Democrats in Massachusetts,
Many people, including me, thought the race to fill Ted Kennedy's unexpired term was over after the Democratic primary.
Given the huge D registration advantage in MA and the high-profile D nominee (Coakley is the sitting AG in Massachusetts), it should have been.
However, that didn't account for a dreadfully complacent candidate and party structure, or a well-run campaign by the R nominee, Brown.
Coakley actually went on vacation during the campaign; understandable if it was a two-year campaign and she needed to decompress and recharge, but jaw-droppingly arrogant during a two-month one. In addition to that, party donors and activists slacked off after the primary and stayed on the sidelines long enough for Brown to gain traction.
None of this would have mattered if the MassDems hadn't gotten cute during the Romney administration a few years back.
Ted Kennedy's health had been failing for years, so, worried that Republican Romney might have had an opportunity to appoint a U.S. Senator of his liking, the Ds in the MA lege forced through a change to the law there that took the power to fill a vacant Senate seat away from the governor and created a special election process.
Oopsie.
The really embarrassing part of this (as if losing the seat held by Ted Kennedy for almost five decades to a lightweight like Brown isn't embarrassing enough) is that if any of the movers and shakers in the Massachusetts Democratic Party or working on the Coakley campaign had ever read Tip O'Neill's autobiography Man of the House or his political primer All Politics is Local, they would have known better than to take an opponent, any opponent, for granted.
And if political operatives in any state have read Tip O'Neill, Massachusetts' politicos have.
Or at least *should* have.
BTW - for all of the talk about the dominance of Democrats in Mass, everyone should remember that Mass voters have voted for Republicans in the recent past. For 16 years, from 1991 until 2007, they had Republican governors there.
Voters there have and will cast their ballots in support of the better candidate, even if that candidate is a Republican (as long as he isn't a Yankees fan too :) ), and simply put, Scott Brown ran a better campaign than Martha Coakley did over the last couple of months.
Now the race starts anew - Brown's filler term ends in 2012. Then he has to run for a full term, with the accompanying full length campaign where no one will underrate him.
In some ways, this will be more fun to watch than a Coakley term. Now Brown has to find a way to placate his teabagger base while not alienating the vast majority of the MA electorate.
Not sure if he developed that skill set required for that as a backbencher the woefully outclassed Republican caucus of the Massachusetts State Senate.
He has shown that he is a skilled campaigner. Will he be a skilled elected official?
Many are saying that it was a referendum on President Barack Obama and plans for reforming health care in America (OK, "many" is shorthand "any Republican who can find a microphone").
There may have been some of that (I don't really think so, though, not in MA), but it was more a referendum on the campaign conducted by Martha Coakley and the Democrats in Massachusetts,
Many people, including me, thought the race to fill Ted Kennedy's unexpired term was over after the Democratic primary.
Given the huge D registration advantage in MA and the high-profile D nominee (Coakley is the sitting AG in Massachusetts), it should have been.
However, that didn't account for a dreadfully complacent candidate and party structure, or a well-run campaign by the R nominee, Brown.
Coakley actually went on vacation during the campaign; understandable if it was a two-year campaign and she needed to decompress and recharge, but jaw-droppingly arrogant during a two-month one. In addition to that, party donors and activists slacked off after the primary and stayed on the sidelines long enough for Brown to gain traction.
None of this would have mattered if the MassDems hadn't gotten cute during the Romney administration a few years back.
Ted Kennedy's health had been failing for years, so, worried that Republican Romney might have had an opportunity to appoint a U.S. Senator of his liking, the Ds in the MA lege forced through a change to the law there that took the power to fill a vacant Senate seat away from the governor and created a special election process.
Oopsie.
The really embarrassing part of this (as if losing the seat held by Ted Kennedy for almost five decades to a lightweight like Brown isn't embarrassing enough) is that if any of the movers and shakers in the Massachusetts Democratic Party or working on the Coakley campaign had ever read Tip O'Neill's autobiography Man of the House or his political primer All Politics is Local, they would have known better than to take an opponent, any opponent, for granted.
And if political operatives in any state have read Tip O'Neill, Massachusetts' politicos have.
Or at least *should* have.
BTW - for all of the talk about the dominance of Democrats in Mass, everyone should remember that Mass voters have voted for Republicans in the recent past. For 16 years, from 1991 until 2007, they had Republican governors there.
Voters there have and will cast their ballots in support of the better candidate, even if that candidate is a Republican (as long as he isn't a Yankees fan too :) ), and simply put, Scott Brown ran a better campaign than Martha Coakley did over the last couple of months.
Now the race starts anew - Brown's filler term ends in 2012. Then he has to run for a full term, with the accompanying full length campaign where no one will underrate him.
In some ways, this will be more fun to watch than a Coakley term. Now Brown has to find a way to placate his teabagger base while not alienating the vast majority of the MA electorate.
Not sure if he developed that skill set required for that as a backbencher the woefully outclassed Republican caucus of the Massachusetts State Senate.
He has shown that he is a skilled campaigner. Will he be a skilled elected official?
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Musical chairs, withdrawals, and leaps - candidate update time
As we move into the new year, the candidate picture is clearing. Note: some of this info has been covered previously, here and elsewhere. And this post is Maricopa County and Scottsdale-centered, so it will not be cross-posted at Blog for Arizona.
...As reported earlier today, State Rep. Chris Deschene (D-LD2) has officially announced that he is pursuing the Democratic nomination for Secretary of State.
...State Sen. Jonathan Paton will be joining the Republican primary in CD8 for a chance to take on Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords.
...Mayor Vernon Parker (R-Paradise Valley), as I predicted (yup, that's a shameless plug :) ) has dropped his bid for the Rep nod for Governor, instead jumping headlong into the CD3 primary to replace the retiring Congressman John Shadegg (R). He will be joining...
...State Sen. Jim Waring (R-LD7), who had been running for State Treasurer...
...State Sen. Pam Gorman (R-LD6)
...State Rep. Sam Crump (R-LD6), who had previously "explored" a run at Attorney General.
...In more musical chairs, replacing Waring in the Treasurer's race is State Senator Barbara Leff. She filed last week.
...Former Vice-Chair of the Arizona Democratic Party Vince Rabago will be joining David Lujan and Felecia Rotellini in the race for the Democratic nomination for Attorney General.
...In Scottsdale news, candidate for City Council Bill Crawford has dropped his bid, citing business concerns over the amount of time necessary to mount a campaign.
...Dennis Robbins, a Scottsdale businessman who had filed for LD8 State Representative, has now filed for Scottsdale City Council. This one had been rumored for a while, but he officially filed with the City last week.
...Not to worry. LD8 Reps, you still have plenty of choices in your primary. One Jacob Chapman has filed paperwork for a run at State Representative.
...Besides Mr. Chapman, AZ Republic blogger Paula Pennypacker has also entered the R primary in LD8. Think: redheaded version of Colette Rosati. *Very* conservative and not a "work across the aisle" type, or even a "work with all branches of the GOP" type.
...One Lori Klein, Republican, has opened an exploratory committee for an unspecified office. Given that she lists her home address as in Anthem, my best guess is that she is looking at one of the soon-to-be vacant LD6 seats.
...Republican Jay Beckstead has filed with the County for a run at County Attorney. Another sign that the current occupant is expected to be leaving office soon, whether because of his legal difficulties or for a run at AG.
...Republican Easton Kelsey has filed to run for the CD6 seat currently held by Jeff Flake. A teabagger who thinks that Jeff Flake is too liberal. Ummm...yeah.
And finally, the nominee for most poorly written headline of the week: AZCentral.com's Political Insider.
Specifically "One-tenth of state Senate running for Congress" from the normally good Mary Jo Pitzl.
Technically, she is correct, in that 3 out of the 30 current members of the state Senate are candidates for Congress (Paton - CD8, Waring and Gorman - CD3). However, her headline gives the impression that this is something unusual or that an unusually large number of Arizona senators are looking to move up/move on. She apparently has forgotten the cases of Harry Mitchell and Gabrielle Giffords in 2006 and Tim Bee and Ann Kirkpatrick in 2008.
She has also ignored the fact that another 13% of the Senate is running for statewide office (Leff and Thayer Verschoor for Treasurer, John Huppenthal for Superintendent of Public Instruction, Jorge Luis Garcia for Corporation Commission).
She has also ignored the fact that at least 20% are termed-out, retiring, or otherwise not seeking reelection to the Senate (Jack Harper, Carolyn Allen, Meg Burton Cahill, Chuck Gray, Jay Tibshraeny, Bob Burns, maybe others).
That's a guarantee of a turnover in the Senate next year of over 43%, and that number doesn't include folks who haven't yet decided to step down or those who will actually lose their races (whether in the primary or the general).
And it is still only January.
...As reported earlier today, State Rep. Chris Deschene (D-LD2) has officially announced that he is pursuing the Democratic nomination for Secretary of State.
...State Sen. Jonathan Paton will be joining the Republican primary in CD8 for a chance to take on Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords.
...Mayor Vernon Parker (R-Paradise Valley), as I predicted (yup, that's a shameless plug :) ) has dropped his bid for the Rep nod for Governor, instead jumping headlong into the CD3 primary to replace the retiring Congressman John Shadegg (R). He will be joining...
...State Sen. Jim Waring (R-LD7), who had been running for State Treasurer...
...State Sen. Pam Gorman (R-LD6)
...State Rep. Sam Crump (R-LD6), who had previously "explored" a run at Attorney General.
...In more musical chairs, replacing Waring in the Treasurer's race is State Senator Barbara Leff. She filed last week.
...Former Vice-Chair of the Arizona Democratic Party Vince Rabago will be joining David Lujan and Felecia Rotellini in the race for the Democratic nomination for Attorney General.
...In Scottsdale news, candidate for City Council Bill Crawford has dropped his bid, citing business concerns over the amount of time necessary to mount a campaign.
...Dennis Robbins, a Scottsdale businessman who had filed for LD8 State Representative, has now filed for Scottsdale City Council. This one had been rumored for a while, but he officially filed with the City last week.
...Not to worry. LD8 Reps, you still have plenty of choices in your primary. One Jacob Chapman has filed paperwork for a run at State Representative.
...Besides Mr. Chapman, AZ Republic blogger Paula Pennypacker has also entered the R primary in LD8. Think: redheaded version of Colette Rosati. *Very* conservative and not a "work across the aisle" type, or even a "work with all branches of the GOP" type.
...One Lori Klein, Republican, has opened an exploratory committee for an unspecified office. Given that she lists her home address as in Anthem, my best guess is that she is looking at one of the soon-to-be vacant LD6 seats.
...Republican Jay Beckstead has filed with the County for a run at County Attorney. Another sign that the current occupant is expected to be leaving office soon, whether because of his legal difficulties or for a run at AG.
...Republican Easton Kelsey has filed to run for the CD6 seat currently held by Jeff Flake. A teabagger who thinks that Jeff Flake is too liberal. Ummm...yeah.
And finally, the nominee for most poorly written headline of the week: AZCentral.com's Political Insider.
Specifically "One-tenth of state Senate running for Congress" from the normally good Mary Jo Pitzl.
Technically, she is correct, in that 3 out of the 30 current members of the state Senate are candidates for Congress (Paton - CD8, Waring and Gorman - CD3). However, her headline gives the impression that this is something unusual or that an unusually large number of Arizona senators are looking to move up/move on. She apparently has forgotten the cases of Harry Mitchell and Gabrielle Giffords in 2006 and Tim Bee and Ann Kirkpatrick in 2008.
She has also ignored the fact that another 13% of the Senate is running for statewide office (Leff and Thayer Verschoor for Treasurer, John Huppenthal for Superintendent of Public Instruction, Jorge Luis Garcia for Corporation Commission).
She has also ignored the fact that at least 20% are termed-out, retiring, or otherwise not seeking reelection to the Senate (Jack Harper, Carolyn Allen, Meg Burton Cahill, Chuck Gray, Jay Tibshraeny, Bob Burns, maybe others).
That's a guarantee of a turnover in the Senate next year of over 43%, and that number doesn't include folks who haven't yet decided to step down or those who will actually lose their races (whether in the primary or the general).
And it is still only January.
Live blogging Senate Judiciary
4:20 - I'm out of here. This isn't meant as disrespect to Sen. Allen. I just have to go home.
4:13 - Carolyn Allen's measure to repeal term limits up now. Allen speaking.
4:10 - Paton says that CE isn't supporting free speech because it is a subsidy. Calls CE candidates "dependent" on the government, not the public. Says it is "morally wrong." Says his colleagues are here to limit government. Doesn't talk about governing responsibly. Votes yes. Measure passes 4 - 2.
4:07 - Huppenthal says that winning office in 1993 was like "winning the lottery." Says that he never took advantage, but opposes CE on ideological grounds. Says CE only enforces rules against Republicans. Votes yes.
4:05 - Chuck Gray *really* hates CE. Calls Clean candidates "government funded", not "publically funded."
4:03 - Voting. Cheuvront criticizes CE's imperfections, but says this is a dishonest measure. Votes no.
4:01 - Paton lists people signed in as supporting/opposed to his measure. For: Business lobbyists. Opposed: Pretty much everyone else.
3:56 - Eric Ehst of the AZ chapter of the National Organization for Women (NOW) is speaking in opposition to Paton's bill. Addressing some of the points raised earlier.
3:54 - Paton hurries the testimony of CE's president, saying that some members want to leave. CE guy is testifying in opposition to Paton's bill. GI wasn't rushed in any way.
3:47 - Paton wants Brown to ID moderates in the lege. To set up a purge list?
3:43 - Brown notes that there are now a wide variety of professions represented in the lege, not just those with access to money from big business. Paton brings up Union boogeyman. Again.
3:41 - Linda Brown, Arizona Advocacy Network, speaking in opposition to Paton's scheme. Debunking many of GI's myths about CE.
3:40 - GI calls matching funds provisions of CE as "punishment" of people who donate to traditional candidates. It's a strawman argument, but I'll talk about that later.
3:37 - GI cites 2008 Corp Commission race and Dem candidates as reason to oppose CE.
3:36 - Picking up from BfA. GI claims to be neutral, but has spent the last few minutes reviling CE.
3:34 - This post is getting to be too long, so I am ending this here out of respect of BfA readers and the other writers. It will be continued on my blog Random Musings, with a summary to be posted here later.
3:33 - GI claims to be neutral on this legislation, but argues against CE.
3:30 - Lang's testimony done; Goldwater Institute up next.
3:27 - Paton criticizes CE for not reducing the influence of lobbyists. Lang responds by noting that wasn't the intent of CE, only to reduce the appearance of corruption by reducing candidates' financial dependence on lobbyists.
3:19 - Chuck Gray argues that CE restricts free speech by funding his first opponent at a higher level than he raised on his own. Calls CE "communistic". Really.
3:17 - Paton objects to tax return check offs funding CE, in light of the recent debates over tax credits. Ignoring the fact that R tax credits are still there. Lang responds that CE has returned more $ to the General Fund than it has received from check offs.
3:13 - Pearce chimes in, complaining that CE is unfair to traditional candidates.
3:12 - Paton says that CE candidates are victims of extortion. Really.
3:08 - Lang supports letting voters consider the entire CE function, not just the funding part. Paton objects because of the name "Clean Elections". He thinks that voters will support "clean". Like they did when they originally approved it.
3:07 - Todd Lang, ED of Clean Elections, testifies in opposition.
3:06 - Miranda wonders if CE could be restricted to "new' candidates; lobbyist hates the idea.
3:04 - Miranda finally off of his hands.
3:03 - Paton comes to the defense of the manufacturing lobbyist, using the boogeyman of labor unions holding parties to collect 5s.
3:00 - OK - Cheuvront off of his hands. About time.
2:56 - Definitely missing Meg Burton Cahill here - Chuck Gray and his saddle partner are serving up Rep talking points thinly-disguised as softball questions, and Ken Cheuvront and Richard Miranda are sitting on their hands.
2:53 - Business lobbyist complains about CE candidates "gaming" the system. Ignores the fact that traditionally-financed candidates (aka - bribees) have been "gaming" the system since time immemorial.
2:52 - Arizona Manufacturer's Council and AZ Chamber of Commerce supports ending CE. The pattern is set - Big Business wants its ability to buy elections back.
2:50 - Michael Bidwill is speaking in support of ending CE. I won't be going to a Cardinals game next season.
2:47 - Paton makes it clear that his intent is to end "taxpayer-subsidized elections" in AZ.
2:45 - Chuck Gray wants to know where funding will go if CE is ended. Paton says funding of CE will continue, they just won't be able to fund candidates.
2:43 - Nominations approved. Start of bill considerations. SCR1009 up first (Clean Elections)
2:35 - Huppenthal has arrived. Six senators present. Meg Burton Cahill absent, excused (I think).
2:33 - Richard Miranda arrived. Five senators present. Also, Senator Carolyn Allen is here. She's not on the ccommittee but she has a measure up for consideration today (SCR1007, repealing term limits)
2:31 - Gavelled into session. Only 4 present (out of 7 members). Introducing staff because it is the first committee meeting of the year.
2:26 - Senate Judiciary will be starting in a few minutes. The agenda will be dominated by measures from Jonathan Paton, Republican State Senator from Tucson and an erstwhile challenger to Democratic Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords in CD8. The big one here (IMO, anyway) is HCR1009, Paton's plan to outlaw publically financed elections. He will also have SCR1013, changing the title of the Secretary of State to Lieutenant Governor. It's a job title change, not an actual job duty change.
More entries as the meeting gets underway.
4:13 - Carolyn Allen's measure to repeal term limits up now. Allen speaking.
4:10 - Paton says that CE isn't supporting free speech because it is a subsidy. Calls CE candidates "dependent" on the government, not the public. Says it is "morally wrong." Says his colleagues are here to limit government. Doesn't talk about governing responsibly. Votes yes. Measure passes 4 - 2.
4:07 - Huppenthal says that winning office in 1993 was like "winning the lottery." Says that he never took advantage, but opposes CE on ideological grounds. Says CE only enforces rules against Republicans. Votes yes.
4:05 - Chuck Gray *really* hates CE. Calls Clean candidates "government funded", not "publically funded."
4:03 - Voting. Cheuvront criticizes CE's imperfections, but says this is a dishonest measure. Votes no.
4:01 - Paton lists people signed in as supporting/opposed to his measure. For: Business lobbyists. Opposed: Pretty much everyone else.
3:56 - Eric Ehst of the AZ chapter of the National Organization for Women (NOW) is speaking in opposition to Paton's bill. Addressing some of the points raised earlier.
3:54 - Paton hurries the testimony of CE's president, saying that some members want to leave. CE guy is testifying in opposition to Paton's bill. GI wasn't rushed in any way.
3:47 - Paton wants Brown to ID moderates in the lege. To set up a purge list?
3:43 - Brown notes that there are now a wide variety of professions represented in the lege, not just those with access to money from big business. Paton brings up Union boogeyman. Again.
3:41 - Linda Brown, Arizona Advocacy Network, speaking in opposition to Paton's scheme. Debunking many of GI's myths about CE.
3:40 - GI calls matching funds provisions of CE as "punishment" of people who donate to traditional candidates. It's a strawman argument, but I'll talk about that later.
3:37 - GI cites 2008 Corp Commission race and Dem candidates as reason to oppose CE.
3:36 - Picking up from BfA. GI claims to be neutral, but has spent the last few minutes reviling CE.
3:34 - This post is getting to be too long, so I am ending this here out of respect of BfA readers and the other writers. It will be continued on my blog Random Musings, with a summary to be posted here later.
3:33 - GI claims to be neutral on this legislation, but argues against CE.
3:30 - Lang's testimony done; Goldwater Institute up next.
3:27 - Paton criticizes CE for not reducing the influence of lobbyists. Lang responds by noting that wasn't the intent of CE, only to reduce the appearance of corruption by reducing candidates' financial dependence on lobbyists.
3:19 - Chuck Gray argues that CE restricts free speech by funding his first opponent at a higher level than he raised on his own. Calls CE "communistic". Really.
3:17 - Paton objects to tax return check offs funding CE, in light of the recent debates over tax credits. Ignoring the fact that R tax credits are still there. Lang responds that CE has returned more $ to the General Fund than it has received from check offs.
3:13 - Pearce chimes in, complaining that CE is unfair to traditional candidates.
3:12 - Paton says that CE candidates are victims of extortion. Really.
3:08 - Lang supports letting voters consider the entire CE function, not just the funding part. Paton objects because of the name "Clean Elections". He thinks that voters will support "clean". Like they did when they originally approved it.
3:07 - Todd Lang, ED of Clean Elections, testifies in opposition.
3:06 - Miranda wonders if CE could be restricted to "new' candidates; lobbyist hates the idea.
3:04 - Miranda finally off of his hands.
3:03 - Paton comes to the defense of the manufacturing lobbyist, using the boogeyman of labor unions holding parties to collect 5s.
3:00 - OK - Cheuvront off of his hands. About time.
2:56 - Definitely missing Meg Burton Cahill here - Chuck Gray and his saddle partner are serving up Rep talking points thinly-disguised as softball questions, and Ken Cheuvront and Richard Miranda are sitting on their hands.
2:53 - Business lobbyist complains about CE candidates "gaming" the system. Ignores the fact that traditionally-financed candidates (aka - bribees) have been "gaming" the system since time immemorial.
2:52 - Arizona Manufacturer's Council and AZ Chamber of Commerce supports ending CE. The pattern is set - Big Business wants its ability to buy elections back.
2:50 - Michael Bidwill is speaking in support of ending CE. I won't be going to a Cardinals game next season.
2:47 - Paton makes it clear that his intent is to end "taxpayer-subsidized elections" in AZ.
2:45 - Chuck Gray wants to know where funding will go if CE is ended. Paton says funding of CE will continue, they just won't be able to fund candidates.
2:43 - Nominations approved. Start of bill considerations. SCR1009 up first (Clean Elections)
2:35 - Huppenthal has arrived. Six senators present. Meg Burton Cahill absent, excused (I think).
2:33 - Richard Miranda arrived. Five senators present. Also, Senator Carolyn Allen is here. She's not on the ccommittee but she has a measure up for consideration today (SCR1007, repealing term limits)
2:31 - Gavelled into session. Only 4 present (out of 7 members). Introducing staff because it is the first committee meeting of the year.
2:26 - Senate Judiciary will be starting in a few minutes. The agenda will be dominated by measures from Jonathan Paton, Republican State Senator from Tucson and an erstwhile challenger to Democratic Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords in CD8. The big one here (IMO, anyway) is HCR1009, Paton's plan to outlaw publically financed elections. He will also have SCR1013, changing the title of the Secretary of State to Lieutenant Governor. It's a job title change, not an actual job duty change.
More entries as the meeting gets underway.
House Democrats respond to Brewer's Budget
Last week, Governor Jan Brewer released her proposed FY2011 Arizona budget. Her proposal was a mish-mash of ideological talking points, campaign spin, fervent wishes, and outright lies.
In the letter/press release accompanying her plan, she states that she won't "compromise" public safety, yet her plan would close the Department of Juvenile Corrections, forcing the responsibility for handling juvenile offenders onto already cash-strapped county jails, and cost 1000 people their jobs.
In the same letter, she promised to protect "total education funding at the State's FY 2006 funding levels." What she didn't say is that she wants to cut $750 million from schools by eliminating all-day Kindergarten and funding for school maintenance (think: balancing the budget by putting students under roofs that are about to collapse).
In addition to those cuts that she said that she wouldn't push, immediately before pushing them, she will throw 360,000 of Arizona's poorest children, adults, and seniors off of health care.
On top of all that, she wants to make Arizona's tax structure, already one of the most regressive in the country, even worse with an increase to Arizona's sales tax.
Add in little nuggets like making the Arizona State Veteran's Home "self-funding", aka "honor Arizona's veterans by charging incapacited and destitute veterans for staying alive" and closing most state parks (crippling the economies of many of Arizona's smaller communities) you have a budget plan that isn't just bad, but horrific.
It also certainly doesn't reflect the values and concerns of Arizonans, who have shown time and again through referenda and initiatives that they support public education and a social safety net.
Of course, part of Brewer's proposal is to suspend or overturn voter mandates.
Democratic leaders in the House were quick to respond, and respond clearly and directly.
The Democratic leadership of the House also sent a letter to the Governor today reiterating their call for real budget talks among all five players at the Capitol (House Ds, Senate Ds, House Rs, Senate Rs, and the Governor's office) to solve the state's budget crisis. That letter noted that while she has indicated her openness to such five-party talks in the past, her actions indicated otherwise (putting an R-written budget in front of the Democrats and ordering them to vote for it isn't really "negotiating").
Personal note: Advice to Reps. Lujan, Sinema, and Campbell (and the rest of the Ds for that matter) -
Don't hold your breath.
AP coverage, courtesy KGUN9.com, here.
Other news:
State Rep. Chris Deschene (D-LD2) officially announced that he is seeking the Democratic nomination for Secretary of State. Not exactly surprising news, as he had been "exploring" a run for weeks.
In the letter/press release accompanying her plan, she states that she won't "compromise" public safety, yet her plan would close the Department of Juvenile Corrections, forcing the responsibility for handling juvenile offenders onto already cash-strapped county jails, and cost 1000 people their jobs.
In the same letter, she promised to protect "total education funding at the State's FY 2006 funding levels." What she didn't say is that she wants to cut $750 million from schools by eliminating all-day Kindergarten and funding for school maintenance (think: balancing the budget by putting students under roofs that are about to collapse).
In addition to those cuts that she said that she wouldn't push, immediately before pushing them, she will throw 360,000 of Arizona's poorest children, adults, and seniors off of health care.
On top of all that, she wants to make Arizona's tax structure, already one of the most regressive in the country, even worse with an increase to Arizona's sales tax.
Add in little nuggets like making the Arizona State Veteran's Home "self-funding", aka "honor Arizona's veterans by charging incapacited and destitute veterans for staying alive" and closing most state parks (crippling the economies of many of Arizona's smaller communities) you have a budget plan that isn't just bad, but horrific.
It also certainly doesn't reflect the values and concerns of Arizonans, who have shown time and again through referenda and initiatives that they support public education and a social safety net.
Of course, part of Brewer's proposal is to suspend or overturn voter mandates.
Democratic leaders in the House were quick to respond, and respond clearly and directly.
“By proposing eliminating Juvenile Corrections, an important facet of public safety in Arizona, Gov. Brewer has failed to lead and continues to push Arizona down the wrong track,” House Democratic Leader David Lujan said.
“Gov. Brewer’s $750 million cut to classrooms is on top of the largest cut to education in state history that she made just last year,” Assistant Democratic Leader Kyrsten Sinema said. “It is wrong to rob health care from kids and seniors. Disrespecting voters and making these kinds of cuts to health care are the wrong priorities for our state.”
The Democratic leadership of the House also sent a letter to the Governor today reiterating their call for real budget talks among all five players at the Capitol (House Ds, Senate Ds, House Rs, Senate Rs, and the Governor's office) to solve the state's budget crisis. That letter noted that while she has indicated her openness to such five-party talks in the past, her actions indicated otherwise (putting an R-written budget in front of the Democrats and ordering them to vote for it isn't really "negotiating").
Personal note: Advice to Reps. Lujan, Sinema, and Campbell (and the rest of the Ds for that matter) -
Don't hold your breath.
AP coverage, courtesy KGUN9.com, here.
Other news:
State Rep. Chris Deschene (D-LD2) officially announced that he is seeking the Democratic nomination for Secretary of State. Not exactly surprising news, as he had been "exploring" a run for weeks.
Monday, January 18, 2010
Things that are more important than the state's budget deficit
At least, more important to Arizona's state legislators, whose primary duty is to craft a balanced budget. They've had time to file 794 bills, memorials, and resolutions, but haven't had the time to address the current fiscal year's budget deficit.
Some early bill filings that are either irrelevent to the fiscal crisis or counterproductive -
- SCR1022, a proposed amendment to the Arizona Constitution from "Cap'n Al" Melvin to give the legislature the authority toswipe sweep "non-custodial" federal monies (i.e. block grants) and to appropriate the monies as the lege sees fit. Related: HB2500 (Rick Murphy).
- SCR1009, Jonathan Paton's proposal to ban Clean Elections and any other public financing of election campaigns.
- SCR1008, Chuck Gray's scheme to abolish the state's income tax and jack up the state's sales tax. Wonder if Donna at Democratic Diva will have anything to say on this one if it gains any traction? Call this the "we want Arizona to be the most regressively-taxed state in the country!" resolution. Other revenue reduction measures include HCR2009 (John Kavanagh), banning estate taxes; HCR2011 (David Gowan) exempting from taxation property used for agricultural purposes or for a trade or business; HB2526 (Frank Antenori), exempting property used for firearms instruction from taxation;
- SCR1007 (Carolyn Allen), HCR2012 (Matt Heinz), HCR2017 (Andy Tobin), HCR2024 (Sam Crump), HCR2029 (Tom Chabin), HCR2030 (Chabin), HCR2031 (Chabin) - all relating to term limits, resign to run, or other areas affecting the ability of legislators to remain legislators.
- HB2557 (Lucy Mason), opting the state of out compliance with the federal "No Child Left Behind" Act
- HB2556 (Mason), barring counties with more than an unspecified number of residents from having an elected county superintendent of schools, shrinking the power of school boards, and for other purposes
- HB2555 (Mason) , repealing full day kindergarten
- HB2543 (Gowan), barring cities, towns and counties from enacting any firearms regulations that are stricter than those enacted by the lege. In other words, no banning guns in parks and other public areas. More gun nuttery: HB2406, expanding last year's "guns in bars" law (hint: "ignorance of the law" will become a valid defense if this one becomes law)
- HB2495 (Debbie Lesko), forcing the state's welfare department to issue electronic "benefits transfer cards" to recipients of food stamps with their names on the cards and to compel the recipients to ID themselves every time they use their benefits
- HB2407 (Antenori), barring municipalities from enacting any tax specific to utility providers
- HB2417 (Carl Seel). I'm really not sure what this one does, but at first glance, it looks *really* bad. It looks like it makes that the only way to fund transportation infrastructure projects will be through "wealth-based debt-free" bank created monies. Whatever the hell that means, it specifically doesn't include taxes or bonds. Given the meltdown of the financial system that took place during the Bush Administration, I'm leery of giving the financial industry any more sway over our society and its infrastructure.
- HB2395 (Lauren Hendrix), barring school districts from allowing payroll deductions for payment of dues to teacher's unions
- HB2382 (Seel), forcing school districts to collect and report to the state data an information on possibly undocumented students
- HB2281 (Steve Montenegro), barring ethnic studies courses in K - 12. Surprisingly, the names of Russell Pearce and John Kavanagh aren't on this one, even though it is right down their nativist alley. Perhaps the "Statement of Policy" section is what has dissuaded them from supporting the measure.
Not a concept that the likes of Pearce and Kavanagh want to see take hold in society.
BTW - That statement of policy was a good start; too bad the rest of the bill doesn't live up to that promising beginning.
- HB2261 (Rich Crandall), expanding the Governing Board of the Maricopa County Community College District with two "at large" members elected county-wide. Call this one the "Republicans want to keep destroying all levels of the state's education system, no matter what" bill. My guess is that while they are worried about losing seats in particular districts, they expect to maintain their dominance over countywide elections and want to use that to keep control even when they lose the majority of voters in particular districts
- HB2248 (Andy Biggs), barring Arizona participation in the Western Climate Initiative. Related: HB2214 (Biggs) barring Arizona government participation in interstate affiliations or groups without express legislative approval
- HB2246 (Biggs), preempting local regulation of consumer fireworks
- HB2226 (Hendrix), relating to school employment decisions. Among other things, would bar school districts from using seniority as a criteria in determining teacher retention
- SB1128 (Melvin), a bill to protect the ability to use public facilities of the Boy Scouts and other organizations that discriminate against members based on their sexual orientation or religious beliefs
- SB1126 (Melvin), Declaring that nuclear fuel (uranium) mined in AZ isn't subject to federal regulation. Ummm...yeah... Something tells me that the feds will politely beg to differ.
Tedski's take here.
- And my personal nominee for the least relevent bill by a legislator during a fiscal crisis:
HCR2008 (Jerry Weiers), an amendment to the AZ Constitution that adds a new civil right to that hallowed list, one that includes things like free speech, a free press, due process of law, habeas corpus and others -
The right to hunt and fish.
To readers: this post ended up being far longer than I expected, and thank you for reading this far.
The sad part is that the current list of bill proposals is nowhere near complete. Expect another 400 - 5oo of them plus 75 - 100 strike-everything amendments before the session is complete.
:(
I do have one question though:
When is the next, and hopefully final, special session to fix the FY2010 budget deficit?
Some early bill filings that are either irrelevent to the fiscal crisis or counterproductive -
- SCR1022, a proposed amendment to the Arizona Constitution from "Cap'n Al" Melvin to give the legislature the authority to
- SCR1009, Jonathan Paton's proposal to ban Clean Elections and any other public financing of election campaigns.
- SCR1008, Chuck Gray's scheme to abolish the state's income tax and jack up the state's sales tax. Wonder if Donna at Democratic Diva will have anything to say on this one if it gains any traction? Call this the "we want Arizona to be the most regressively-taxed state in the country!" resolution. Other revenue reduction measures include HCR2009 (John Kavanagh), banning estate taxes; HCR2011 (David Gowan) exempting from taxation property used for agricultural purposes or for a trade or business; HB2526 (Frank Antenori), exempting property used for firearms instruction from taxation;
- SCR1007 (Carolyn Allen), HCR2012 (Matt Heinz), HCR2017 (Andy Tobin), HCR2024 (Sam Crump), HCR2029 (Tom Chabin), HCR2030 (Chabin), HCR2031 (Chabin) - all relating to term limits, resign to run, or other areas affecting the ability of legislators to remain legislators.
- HB2557 (Lucy Mason), opting the state of out compliance with the federal "No Child Left Behind" Act
- HB2556 (Mason), barring counties with more than an unspecified number of residents from having an elected county superintendent of schools, shrinking the power of school boards, and for other purposes
- HB2555 (Mason) , repealing full day kindergarten
- HB2543 (Gowan), barring cities, towns and counties from enacting any firearms regulations that are stricter than those enacted by the lege. In other words, no banning guns in parks and other public areas. More gun nuttery: HB2406, expanding last year's "guns in bars" law (hint: "ignorance of the law" will become a valid defense if this one becomes law)
- HB2495 (Debbie Lesko), forcing the state's welfare department to issue electronic "benefits transfer cards" to recipients of food stamps with their names on the cards and to compel the recipients to ID themselves every time they use their benefits
- HB2407 (Antenori), barring municipalities from enacting any tax specific to utility providers
- HB2417 (Carl Seel). I'm really not sure what this one does, but at first glance, it looks *really* bad. It looks like it makes that the only way to fund transportation infrastructure projects will be through "wealth-based debt-free" bank created monies. Whatever the hell that means, it specifically doesn't include taxes or bonds. Given the meltdown of the financial system that took place during the Bush Administration, I'm leery of giving the financial industry any more sway over our society and its infrastructure.
- HB2395 (Lauren Hendrix), barring school districts from allowing payroll deductions for payment of dues to teacher's unions
- HB2382 (Seel), forcing school districts to collect and report to the state data an information on possibly undocumented students
- HB2281 (Steve Montenegro), barring ethnic studies courses in K - 12. Surprisingly, the names of Russell Pearce and John Kavanagh aren't on this one, even though it is right down their nativist alley. Perhaps the "Statement of Policy" section is what has dissuaded them from supporting the measure.
"The legislature finds and declares that public school pupils should be taught to treat and value each other as individuals and not based on ethnic background."Treating people based on their individual qualities and not their ethnic backgrounds?
Not a concept that the likes of Pearce and Kavanagh want to see take hold in society.
BTW - That statement of policy was a good start; too bad the rest of the bill doesn't live up to that promising beginning.
- HB2261 (Rich Crandall), expanding the Governing Board of the Maricopa County Community College District with two "at large" members elected county-wide. Call this one the "Republicans want to keep destroying all levels of the state's education system, no matter what" bill. My guess is that while they are worried about losing seats in particular districts, they expect to maintain their dominance over countywide elections and want to use that to keep control even when they lose the majority of voters in particular districts
- HB2248 (Andy Biggs), barring Arizona participation in the Western Climate Initiative. Related: HB2214 (Biggs) barring Arizona government participation in interstate affiliations or groups without express legislative approval
- HB2246 (Biggs), preempting local regulation of consumer fireworks
- HB2226 (Hendrix), relating to school employment decisions. Among other things, would bar school districts from using seniority as a criteria in determining teacher retention
- SB1128 (Melvin), a bill to protect the ability to use public facilities of the Boy Scouts and other organizations that discriminate against members based on their sexual orientation or religious beliefs
- SB1126 (Melvin), Declaring that nuclear fuel (uranium) mined in AZ isn't subject to federal regulation. Ummm...yeah... Something tells me that the feds will politely beg to differ.
Tedski's take here.
- And my personal nominee for the least relevent bill by a legislator during a fiscal crisis:
HCR2008 (Jerry Weiers), an amendment to the AZ Constitution that adds a new civil right to that hallowed list, one that includes things like free speech, a free press, due process of law, habeas corpus and others -
The right to hunt and fish.
To readers: this post ended up being far longer than I expected, and thank you for reading this far.
The sad part is that the current list of bill proposals is nowhere near complete. Expect another 400 - 5oo of them plus 75 - 100 strike-everything amendments before the session is complete.
:(
I do have one question though:
When is the next, and hopefully final, special session to fix the FY2010 budget deficit?
Sunday, January 17, 2010
A Republican is driven away by his own party
A Republican candidate for Superintendent of Public Instruction, Gary Nine, has withdrawn from the race for his party's nomination.
Normally, I wouldn't write about that - it's a relatively minor office as far as statewide offices go (still has it all over State Mine Inspector, though :) ) and there are still plenty of Rs in that race.
Oh, and literally, I know nothing about Mr. Nine beyond what I've read about his candidacy on his website.
However, being a good partisan blogger, I still checked out his website one last time before deleting it from my bookmarks (I've got hundreds of them, and a chance to winnow one out is not a chance to be missed :) ).
After reading his statement of withdrawal, I was left with two distinct impressions -
As a Democrat, I'm glad there aren't more Republicans like him. When out campaigning for Democratic candidates, it's easy to laud the Dems while highlighting the bad points of the likes of Russell Pearce, Jack Harper, and the rest of the Kool-Aid drinkers in the lege.
As an Arizonan however, I wish all of Arizona's Rs were like him.
From his statement:
For her trouble, she is reviled as a "RINO" by GOPers statewide and harassed almost daily...by her own caucus-mates.
Personal note: the "cohesive" comment definitely brightened my day. :)
However, his piece is thoughtful, perceptive, and civil. Unlike the vast majority of political discourse in Arizona, particularly that which is emanating from the R side of the aisle.
There is room for civility among the disagreement that is a fundamental part of politics. Civility is possible, even between people with strongly divergent opinions, when those people have goals that are similar.
Like the betterment of the state for every one of its residents.
Lastly, Mr. Nine wrote in his piece how he has been a Republican since after he came home from service in Vietnam, so perhaps he wouldn't consider changing his registration to Democratic (though anyone as dedicated to a strong, vibrant, and effective public education system for Arizona's students would be welcome here), but I hope he remains active in public service, even as a Republican. If Mr. Nine and those like him forsake active involvement in civic affairs because of the number of extremists, the extremists gain strength and influence.
Arizona needs the involvement of more people who care about the state and its future, regardless of their partisan affiliations (or non-affiliations).
Normally, I wouldn't write about that - it's a relatively minor office as far as statewide offices go (still has it all over State Mine Inspector, though :) ) and there are still plenty of Rs in that race.
Oh, and literally, I know nothing about Mr. Nine beyond what I've read about his candidacy on his website.
However, being a good partisan blogger, I still checked out his website one last time before deleting it from my bookmarks (I've got hundreds of them, and a chance to winnow one out is not a chance to be missed :) ).
After reading his statement of withdrawal, I was left with two distinct impressions -
As a Democrat, I'm glad there aren't more Republicans like him. When out campaigning for Democratic candidates, it's easy to laud the Dems while highlighting the bad points of the likes of Russell Pearce, Jack Harper, and the rest of the Kool-Aid drinkers in the lege.
As an Arizonan however, I wish all of Arizona's Rs were like him.
From his statement:
One of my strengths is that I am true to my foundational values. I know me and I know what I'm not. I have declared as a Republican Clean Elections candidate but after my experience of the last six months, which includes becoming aware that Arizona's reigning Republican leadership would enjoy seeing the demise of public education, I now know without doubt that I truly can no longer claim to be an Arizona Republican.Now, I disagree with his characterization of Democrats as having adopted relatively extreme positions or electing relatively extreme candidates - any party that can elect someone as liberal as Kyrsten Sinema and as conservative as Jack Brown to the state House of Representatives and both garner great respect from their colleagues is a "Big Tent" party with room for many perspectives. Compare this to the case of State Senator Carolyn Allen (R-Scottsdale) who is perhaps the closest thing to a true moderate in the AZGOP and in the R caucus of the legislature.
{snip}
The Arizona Legislature is presently composed of a very cohesive group of Democrats, and then there are the Republicans, who are comprised of very few moderates, a majority of conservative Republicans, and a significant number of Libertarians that call themselves Republicans.
{snip}
It is obvious that Arizona has a number of zealots and few statesmen in the Legislature. The organized Republicans, including the Libertarians, and Democrats, although to a lesser degree, have adopted relatively extreme positions, disenfranchising most of us regular folks. The result is that the disenfranchised middle usually does NOT vote in the primary thus ensuring that the usually more extreme candidate supported by either party wins.
{snip}
I've been told that businesses, when thinking of relocating, demand three things. First, an available well-educated work force; secondly, great schools for their worker's children to attend; and thirdly, well-led, visionary state leadership that works cohesively with a progressive governmental structure. Does that sound like Arizona right now?
For her trouble, she is reviled as a "RINO" by GOPers statewide and harassed almost daily...by her own caucus-mates.
Personal note: the "cohesive" comment definitely brightened my day. :)
However, his piece is thoughtful, perceptive, and civil. Unlike the vast majority of political discourse in Arizona, particularly that which is emanating from the R side of the aisle.
There is room for civility among the disagreement that is a fundamental part of politics. Civility is possible, even between people with strongly divergent opinions, when those people have goals that are similar.
Like the betterment of the state for every one of its residents.
Lastly, Mr. Nine wrote in his piece how he has been a Republican since after he came home from service in Vietnam, so perhaps he wouldn't consider changing his registration to Democratic (though anyone as dedicated to a strong, vibrant, and effective public education system for Arizona's students would be welcome here), but I hope he remains active in public service, even as a Republican. If Mr. Nine and those like him forsake active involvement in civic affairs because of the number of extremists, the extremists gain strength and influence.
Arizona needs the involvement of more people who care about the state and its future, regardless of their partisan affiliations (or non-affiliations).
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)