Friday, October 14, 2011

Campaign committees update...

...and some sad news in the "he's not running" department..

First up, the sad news - Harry Mitchell, the long-time Tempe (and Arizona) icon announced that he will NOT seek election to Congress next year.

From his Facebook page -
"While having the confidence, energy and strong support for a successful campaign in a new Tempe-centered district, I’ve decided against pursuing it. While my life in public service has taught me that positive change – no matter how difficult – is possible, I’d rather spend my energy here at home than be steeped in the partisan infighting, gridlock and subsequent dysfunction that has overtaken Washington. I, like many others, simply do not have the patience for that anymore."
While the selfish part of me hopes that he reconsiders his decision, the part of me that is in awe of his more than four decades of public service (teacher, councilman, mayor, state senator, U.S. Congressman) only says -

THANK YOU HARRY!

I respect his decision, but fervently wish it was otherwise. 

There will be more (lots more!) written about this at a later time.  Right now, on to the rest of the post.

Note:  Where a legislative or Congressional district is specified, that number is likely to change once the redistricting process is complete.

In U.S. Congress campaign news, Tucson lawyer Christopher Scileppi has formed a committee to run for CD7 as a GOPer.

Seriously, where the FEC's form asks for partisan affiliation, he entered "GOP".









 
...Warren Petersen of Gilbert has formed a committee for a run at the Republican nomination for Arizona House of Representatives in LD22.  I think he's a real estate agent (his name doesn't make for the best search terms).
 
...Chris Schaffner of north Scottsdale has formed a committee for a run at Scottsdale City Council.  The forms on Scottsdale's election website aren't linkable, but he lists his occupation as "account manager" at Milliken.
 
...In Tempe, Derek Deutsch and Joseph Pospicil Jr. (exploratory) have formed $500 Threshold exemption committees for runs at Tempe City Council.  Deutsch ran as a Libertarian for the Kyrene Justice of the Peace job last year (he never made it on to the ballot).  Couldn't find out much about Pospicil, though I *think* he's a Libertarian, too, but I'm not absolutely sure about it.
 
Later...

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Light posting for the next few days...

Due to the fact that there aren't 48 hours in a day (meaning that I've had a busy schedule for the last few days and will be busy tomorrow night), posting will be light to nonexistent until Friday night or maybe even Saturday.  :((

Until then, here's a little light reading -

...The Republicans in AZ's Congressional delegation are looking to use the Grand Canyon, one of the country's national treasures (and Arizona's crown jewel) to help mining companies socialize costs and risks while privatizing profits and benefits by opening up the Grand Canyon area to uranium mining.  The Cronkite News Service has the story here.

...The New York Times published an editorial exposing the Republicans myth of "voter fraud."  Definitely worth a read.

...Stephen Lemons of the Phoenix New Times lends some insight into the shenanigans of some of Russell Pearce's supporters/paid consultants here.

...In non-political news, Theo Epstein, GM of the Boston Red Sox, is taking a position with the Chicago Cubs.  He worked miracles in Boston (first World Series championship in 86 years!!!) but if he can right the ship at Wrigley, he should be named Secretary of the Treasury. 

It's getting to the point where only a miracle worker of the first class will be able to fix the mess that is the American economy.

Later...

Saturday, October 08, 2011

Stalking state laws: the NRA and its lobbyists work slowly but inexorably

The NRA is proving that when it comes to lobbying state legislatures, persistence is almost as important as money, as is the patience to take small bites.  (Not that lots of money hurts. :)  )

Perhaps it's the old saw about repeating a lie often enough that it becomes fact (Goebbels?) or maybe it's just familiarity breeding...familiarity, but persistence and patience have worked very well indeed for them.

When they try to grab a big bunch of policy ground in one chunk, that is when they experience most of their setbacks, as happened in Arizona this year where a governor who is a strong supporter of the NRA vetoed a "firearms omnibus" bill that contained all sorts of NRA wish-list items (like allowing guns in schools).

Many of its recent legislative successes, such as the raft of "guns in bars" bills that have passed state legislatures in recent years, are rooted in efforts that began years ago.

Here in Arizona, the first "guns in bars" bill (that I can find, anyway) first appeared in 2003.

Then in 2004.

And in 2005.

And, after a couple of years to catch their breath, in 2008.

And again in 2009.

Finally, later in 2009, the measure was passed and signed into law.


Of course, that doesn't compare to efforts to weaken local control of firearms.  In many states, the ability of local municipalities to pass gun control measures to bolster public safety has been curtailed or even eliminated.

Those efforts have been relentless, starting in the mid-1990s.

Despite the fact that municipal governments are the "retail" level of government and know best what works for their cities.

Here in Arizona, the legislature passed or considered measures affecting local firearms control in...

...1999.  The measure was vetoed, but would have barred political subdivisions (aka - counties and municipalities) from enacting ordinances affecting or participating in lawsuits against firearms manufacturers

...2000.  Decreased the ability of political subdivisions from enacting ordinances affecting firearms.  Enacted into law.

...2001.  Failed in the Arizona House, but would have completely removed the ability of political subdivisions to enact or enforce *any* rule or ordinance relating to firearms.

...2002.  In a switch, the NRA lobbied against a bill.  They killed a measure that would have required the establishment of a task force of local, county, state and federal agencies to trace crime guns.

...2003.  Barred local regulation of gun sales in their jurisdiction.  Enacted into law.

...2006.  Barred political subdivisions and state agencies from enacting ordinances and rules relating to the storage of firearms.  Enacted into law.

...2007.  Barred a political subdivision from prohibiting a peace officer from carrying a firearm, except under very specific conditions.  Enacted into law.

...2009.  Barred employers, both public and private, from enacting or enforcing policies prohibiting their employees from storing weapons in the cars.  Known as the "guns in cars" bill.  Enacted into law.

...2010.  Further diminished the ability of municipalities to enact any ordinances or rules relating to firearms.  Enacted into law.

...2011.  Barred political subdivisions from restricting hunting within city limits.  Enacted into law.

That pattern of diminution of local control was also evident in the firearms omnibus bill mentioned earlier.  It featured a clause barring universities and other schools from adopting and/or enforcing policies restricting the possession of weapons on their campuses.

The NRA, through its lobbying arm, the Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA), regularly rallies its members to swamp state legislators with phone calls and emails in support of (or opposition to) legislative proposals.

They also aren't shy about directly lobbying legislators.

From the Arizona Legislature's events calendar -






















And that wasn't an isolated day - the NRA, its proxies (like the Arizona Citizens Defense League above), or both, lobby the legislature on a nearly daily basis.
















Above, Dave Kopp of the Arizona Citizen Defense League, testifies February 14, 2011 before the Senate Judiciary Committee in support of a "guns in schools" bill.  A short while later, a lobbyist directly employed by the NRA spoke in favor of the same bill.

Kopp is so friendly with the people running the Senate that when he walks into the Senate building, its almost like he entering his own office.

Seriously.  I've seen it many times.

He walks behind the reception counter, puts his briefcase on top the counter, and starts going through papers and agendas and other things back there like he owns the place.

And given how successful the NRA and its proxies have been at the Arizona Legislature and in many legislatures across the country, maybe they do.

This post is written as part of the Media Matters Gun Facts fellowship. The purpose of the fellowship is to further Media Matters' mission to comprehensively monitor, analyze, and correct conservative misinformation in the U.S. media. Some of the worst misinformation occurs around the issue of guns, gun violence, and extremism, the fellowship program is designed to fight this misinformation with facts.

Schedule For The Second Round Of Redistricting Hearings Announced

In addition to its business meetings, the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (AIRC) holds two series of public hearings all over the state.

During the first round of hearings, they solicited public input on what the AIRC should consider when drawing up maps.

Now, they've completed a draft map of Congressional districts and will have a draft map for legislative districts by the end of the weekend.

During the second round of public hearings, they'll accept feedback on those draft maps, and suggestions for changes to the maps.  Most of the suggestions won't be turned into changes to the maps (if only because many will be contradictory), but some will.

The schedule of hearings (start time 6 p.m. unless otherwise noted),  All are subject to change, so check 48 hours beforehand before making travel plans:

Tuesday, October 11 -

Phoenix College
Auditorium
1202 W. Thomas Road
Phoenix, AZ 85044


Wednesday, October 12 -

Best Western Payson Inn
801 North Beeline Highway 87
Payson, AZ 85547


Thursday, October 13 -

Flagstaff City Hall
Council Chambers
211 West Aspen Avenue
Flagstaff, AZ 86001


Friday, October 14 -

Navajo Nation Museum
Highway 264 and Loop Road
Window Rock, AZ 86515
Start time: 1 p.m. MDT/Noon MST


Saturday, October 15 -

Navajo Nation Museum
Highway 264 and Loop Road
Window Rock, AZ 86515
Start time: 9 a.m.


Saturday, October 15 -

Hon Dah Resort – Casino
Mt. Baldy Room
777 Hwy 260
Pinetop, AZ 85935
Start time: 3 p.m.


Monday, October 17 -

Moenkopi Legacy Inn & Suites
Junction Hwy 160
Tuba City, AZ 86045
Start time: 10 a.m. MDT/9 a.m. MST

Prescott Valley Public Library
Council Chambers/Auditorium
7401 E. Civic Circle
Prescott Valley, AZ 86314
Start time: 6 p.m.


Tuesday, October 18 -

Chandler City Hall
Council Chambers
175 S. Arizona Avenue
Chandler, AZ 85244


Wednesday, October 19 -

Bullhead City Council Chambers
1255 Marina Boulevard
Bullhead City, AZ 86422


Thursday, October 20 -

Maryvale High School
Auditorium
3415 N. 59th Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85033


Friday, October 21 -

Apache Gold Casino Resort
5 miles East of Globe on Highway 70
San Carlos, AZ 85550
Start time:  11 a.m.

City of Globe
Location TBA
Start time: 6 p.m.


Saturday, October 22 -

West View High School
10850 W. Garden Lakes Parkway
Avondale, AZ 85392
Start time: 1 p.m.


Monday, October 24 -

Tohono O’odham Utility Authority Conference Room
Hwy 86 Mile Post 112
Sells, AZ 85634
Start time 11 a.m.

University of Arizona
Student Union Memorial Center
North Ballroom
1303 E. University Blvd.
Tucson, AZ 85721
Start time 6 p.m.


Tuesday, October 25 -

Buena Performing Arts Center (Buena High School)
5225 Buena School Boulevard
Sierra Vista, AZ 85635


Wednesday, October 26 -

Holiday Inn
777 N. Pinal Avenue
Casa Grande, AZ 85122


Thursday, October 27 -

Eastern Arizona College
615 N. Stadium Ave.
Thatcher, AZ 85552


Friday, October 28 -

Americana Hotel
639 N. Grand Avenue
Nogales, AZ 85621


Saturday, October 29 -

Yuma City Hall
City Council Chambers One City Plaza
Yuma, AZ 85364
Start time: 1 p.m.
 
 
Tuesday, November 1 -
 
South Mountain Community College
7050 South 24th Street
Phoenix, AZ 85402


Wednesday, November 2 -

City of Peoria
Location TBA


Thursday, November 3 - 

Granite Reef Senior Center
1700 North Granite Reef Road
Scottsdale, AZ 85257


Friday, November 4 -

Town of Marana
Marana Municipal Complex
Auditorium
11555 W. Civic Center Drive
Marana, AZ 85653


Saturday, November 5 -

Town of Green Valley
Location TBA
Start time: 10 a.m.

Friday, October 07, 2011

AIRC meeting in Tempe this weekend: Be there or risk being in a "safe" district

..."Safe" for the other side, that is...

The Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (AIRC) has meetings scheduled for both Saturday and Sunday to work on a legislative districts draft map.

It's safe to bet that the Republicans and their tea party proxies will be out in force (though given that Sunday's meeting will be during prime football watching time, that force may be slightly smaller :) ), so a healthy presence of people who support both competitive districts and protecting communities of interest (no matter how much the Rs like to stamp their feet and whine otherwise, those are hardly mutually exclusive objectives).

Any folks who want to see Tempe basically stay in one LD (currently, it's mostly covered by LD17, with the far southern part in LD20) need to be there.

Both meetings will be at the Sheraton Phoenix Airport Hotel, 1600 S. 52nd Street, Tempe, AZ 85281 (NW corner of Broadway and 52nd St., near I-10).

Saturday's agenda is here: the meeting starts at 9:30 a.m.

Sunday's agenda is here; the meeting starts at 1 p.m.

Thursday, October 06, 2011

Name-calling at the people you want to vote for you may not be the best campaign tactic

Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain, the current flavor of the week in the R field of contenders (Chris Christie threatened to unseat Cain, but Christie decided not to enter the race) seems to be falling into the same pattern as the other recent flavors of the week -

They move to the front of the pack and proceed to show everyone why they're unqualified even for the nomination, much less the office.

Earlier this evening, he appeared on The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell on MSNBC.  When host O'Donnell brought up a poll showing that 81% of Americans support a small tax increase on the wealthiest Americans. 

Cain responded by saying that the Democrats have brainwashed 81% of Americans.

I'm not kidding (like I could make up something this outlandish :) )

Now, I'm not a math major or an accountant, but it seems that Cain can't comprehend that he needs the support of more than the 19% (100% - 81%) has hasn't insulted if he actually expects to win the presidency.

Time Magazine has coverage here; Mediaite has coverage here (their coverage includes embedded video).

Wednesday, October 05, 2011

Hell hath no fury...

...like Arizona Republicans who are afraid they might actually have to run on the merits of their positions and their skills as candidates.

The Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (AIRC) has released a "draft" map of Congressional districts.  Based on preliminary numbers ("preliminary" because the district lines will change, at least a little bit, after the next round of public hearings, starting next week), there are four districts that are basically "safe" Republican, two districts that are basically "safe" Democratic, and three districts that are competitive.

Personally, I think the people of Arizona in general (and every non-Republican in particular, which is 2/3 of the state) are done a disservice by this draft map.  A better map would have three safe R districts, two safe D districts, and four truly competitive ones was and is an attainable goal.

However, I'm not going to whine about it.  I'm just going to spend time this weekend working up a map that meets that objective while also adhering to the other criteria mandated by the Arizona constitution.

However2, I'm not going to let my unwillingness to whine stop me from mocking Republican whining.

Nope, not at all.

:)

First up on the hit parade:  Governor Jan Brewer.

She put out a press release today on the official governor's website that wasn't exactly a prime example of non-partisanship.

From her press release (and my responses) -
"The IRC proposal is simply gerrymandering at its worst," said Governor Brewer. "This unaccountable, unelected Commission has misused its authority to draw a congressional map that is every Democrat‟s dream. In doing so, they‟ve violated their bedrock legal requirements to maintain districts that protect communities of interest and are geographically compact."


"Unaccountable"?  Only to the law.  Something that Jan and her clan may not have much respect for, but the law is something that most of rest of us have a deep respect for.

"Unelected"?  Perhaps, but that was the idea behind the creation of the AIRC by the voters - take redistricting out of the hands of elected officials who are more concerned with keeping their jobs than doing what is best for Arizona.  In addition, while the members of the AIRC are "unelected," they are appointed by elected officials after betting vetted and screened by a commission headed up by the Chief Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court.

As for her allegation that the primary concerns for the AIRC are to protect "communities of interest" and create districts that are "geographically compact"?

From Article Four, Part Two, Section One of the Arizona Constitution -
14) The independent redistricting commission shall establish congressional and legislative districts. The commencement of the mapping process for both the congressional and legislative districts shall be the creation of districts of equal population in a grid-like pattern across the state. Adjustments to the grid shall then be made as necessary to accommodate the goals as set forth below:



A. Districts shall comply with the United States Constitution and the United States voting rights act;


B. Congressional districts shall have equal population to the extent practicable, and state legislative districts shall have equal population to the extent practicable;


C. Districts shall be geographically compact and contiguous to the extent practicable;


D. District boundaries shall respect communities of interest to the extent practicable;


E. To the extent practicable, district lines shall use visible geographic features, city, town and county boundaries, and undivided census tracts;


F. To the extent practicable, competitive districts should be favored where to do so would create no significant detriment to the other goals.
All of those criteria are equal in importance in terms of the redistricting process, and I'm betting that Brewer and her handlers know that.  They're just ignoring that inconvenient fact.

From the press release:
This new proposal, however, throws that concept out the window – completely rewriting Arizona‟s congressional lines in a move that splits counties and communities and tosses large numbers of voters and sitting members of Congress into new districts.


Duh.  (That's my high school debating experience showing through there...oh wait - my HS didn't have a debate team. :) )

Also, take a look at the current map, one that Republicans love.  Many communities and most counties are split into two or more districts.  With Arizona's population pattern of incredibly densely populated areas in metro Phoenix and Tucson while most of the rest of the state is incredibly sparsely populated, splits are going to happen.

I was going to analyze and rebut similar press releases from many of the Republicans in AZ's Congressional delegation, but they were too....similar.

Similar to the point of obviously being part of a coordinated disinformation campaign, and similar to the point of possibly being written by the same person.

Remember English 101? 

Do a compare-and-contrast exercise - David Schweikert's press release is here; Jeff Flake's is here; Paul Gosar's is here; John McCain's and Jon Kyl's is here; Ben Quayle's is here; and for good measure (guess he didn't want to feel left out), a statement by Andy Tobin, speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, is here.

Note: all of the above statements courtesy the Republican press release outlet blog Sonoran Alliance.

Andrei Cherny, chair of the Arizona Democratic Party, issued his own statement in response to the Republican blitzkrieg against the AIRC.  I won't reprint the entire statement, but here is the final line, and it sums up my thoughts far more concisely than my own words can -
"The only reason 50/50 districts are a threat to Republican electoral prospects is because of the extreme, out-of-touch agenda that Arizona Republican leaders have been pursuing. Gov. Brewer should spend less time on bullying and more on job creation, and substitute real leadership for these partisan attacks. It is beneath the dignity of the governorship and not in keeping with the best interests of the state.”

Later...


Ummm...redistricting is supposed to rewrite district lines and to move voters and sitting elected officials into new districts.  That is why it's called "redistricting."
A mix of outright lies and lies of omission.

Tuesday, October 04, 2011

Update to Committees Update: Republican going Independent to run against Arpaio

Oops.  Turns out I missed a pretty big development in campaign committees news in my last post on the topic.

From the Valley Fever column on the Phoenix New Times' website, written by James King -
Scottsdale Lieutenant Mike Stauffer, the man who hopes to unseat Joe Arpaio as Maricopa County sheriff, announced Friday that he's switching party affiliation to run as an Independent.


It's probably a pretty good move -- Stauffer originally was running as a Republican, which means he would have had to face Arpaio in a GOP primary. Arpaio's brand of fruitcake, reality show sheriffin' tends to appeal to Maricopa County's far-right-wing-nuts, who would likely vote en masse for America's self-proclaimed "toughest sheriff."

Stauffer, a life-long Republican, has said from the first days of his candidacy that the office of the sheriff shouldn't be politicized -- that it's about law enforcement, not political ideologies.
Stauffer's revised campaign paperwork is here.  His campaign website is here.

More updates as there is, well, more to update.  :)







 

Monday, October 03, 2011

Guest column: Lunch anyone?

By Jerry Gettinger, friend and friend of the blog

I was invited to lunch by an acquaintance the other day. I had not known this person very long. The occasion was a gathering of people who shared a communal interest. Those that were there had a common look… a look of resignation and fatigue. There was not much in the way of small talk; I imagine chit-chat had all but left their minds some time ago. I looked around the room and saw that most everyone just sat and waited, as if they had done this before and often. One person told me that it took almost an entire day to get her unemployment check. Paying the babysitter did not leave much in the way of spending money. Not if you want to feed your kids. Her husband worked two jobs. Still that was not enough.

Denny’s was gracious enough to let us use a private room. As the server took our orders, I glanced up and saw that people were concentrating on the price, not the food…the right side of the menu. No one ordered a big lunch…a plain hamburger was the usual, and for some, that was a stretch. Maybe I read too much into the body language. However, it seemed that ordering was difficult; I imagine it was the fact that eating out was a luxury that was seldom enjoyed. A different occasion that came about only recently.

 
My host had been out of work over 18 months. That was not unusual. We were asked to introduce ourselves and say a few words about why we were here. The stories began to take on a rhythm. “Worked for a company for 12 years, got laid off with 2 weeks’ pay,” or “the regional came in, called a meeting, said the company was relocating to Mexico, apologized, and left.” Strangely, there was no anger from anyone, from no one but me. When it was my turn, I began speaking in a soft voice, almost a whisper. I’m not comfortable speaking in front of a large group. But then, as I began to recite why I was there, my voice began rising. “They are ruining my country, they take and never give, one word is never used, “Compassion.” By the time I finished, I was shouting, and so was everyone else. Yelling and clapping! “Yes, yea that’s right they have to be stopped.” I was astounded at how angry I was, passed anger, actually enraged and passing the emotion on. Fury started coming out. And so it was with many of the others in attendance.

 
Do not misconstrue what I have said. These are good people, the kind who would pick up a five-dollar bill you dropped, they would pick it up, and made sure you got it back. After all, you might need it to feed your children. I finished talking then lunch was brought in. I could not eat. The people with whom I was eating were the kind that made our country strong and resilient. They dutifully paid Social Security and maybe, during a war (and there seemed to be many wars) purchased savings bonds. These were the same ones who were told that they would have to forgo part of their social security because...well you know the story. I wonder what they thought when they hear about someone on Wall Street making $25 million in one year with their husbands working 3 jobs and college is unreachable. They have been so beat upon; they don’t have the strength left to fight. “What do I do now? I do not have anything left. They won.”

 
The sad part is, they have won. They won, even though it wasn’t much of a battle. There wasn’t much left. Our representatives don’t represent and our clergy tell us that we have to die to find God, and honestly, what has God done for me, anyway? The richest people produce nothing but money…and begat more... for themselves. They conduct themselves with impunity, thumbing their nose at laws. Laws are for people of color or those without money. Education is out of reach. I cannot better myself without an education, but I cannot afford an education: you have priced it out of my reach. And so, I will flip burgers at McD or work as a cashier at a big box store.



This country lied. It said we would have the same opportunity as the person next door. We did not. Once they became powerful, they made certain that we would have no chance of achieving anything. There is nothing left to do but hope for the best. Every pol sounds the same; every leader promises then lies when he (or she) discovers how easy it is to live off the voters. Just promise every two (or six) years and you can relax and enjoy life forevermore. Remember “and they lived happily ever after.” Maybe someday! It is almost too late. Too late to take it back. The dictionary defines restore as…v. re’store 1. Give something back. 2. Return something to its previous condition



Join me. Come with me on a mission, a quest, what the dictionary defines as an adventurous expedition. Come help me pull our country away from the evil and return it to the goodness it once was. This is still a democracy and we still can vote change. We must take action or else all will be lost. The country is still ours to take back.

Friday, September 30, 2011

Update: 2012 Campaign Committees+

Not just campaign committees this time around, possible ballot questions too!

...Ginger Rough of the Arizona Republic has coverage of the filing of paperwork for eight possible initiative questions by a heretofore undheard-of organization called Fox Petitions.

The initiative proposals include -

I-05-2012, Smart Prison Population Act, mandating the expansion of the practice of home detention for non-violent prisoners

I-06-2012, Supporting Adoptable Cats and Dogs Act, prohibiting the euthanization of healthy and adoptable cats and dogs in Arizona

I-07-2012, Workers' Rights Act, barring employers from firing employees for behavior outside of the employment relationship, except under specific conditions

I-08-2012, Honest Officials Act, it's too difficult to sum up in one sentence, but I call it the "public officials can't lie to the public" act

I-09-2012, No Criminal Exemptions Act, barring the enforcement of a criminal law against any person if that law exempts a person or class of persons.  The explanation says it specifically targets laws that exempt elected officials and government employees, but it is crafted very broadly

I-10-2012, Victimless Crime Act, barring the prosecution or incarceration of a person for behavior that doesn't harm another person, another person's property, or an animal

I-11-2012, Fair Crime Act, mandating that in the event that one criminal act that may violate multiple sections of law can only be prosecuted under one of those sections, the one with the least severe punishment

I-12-2012. Wrongful Conviction Compensation Act, compensating the victims of wrongful convictions and incarceration at $1000 per day of wrongful incarceration

Some of the proposals are intriguing, and I may sign one or more of the petitions if the opportunity presents itself (I especially like the one that would force public officials to stop lying to the public).

One other initiative was recently submitted.

I-04-2012, Go Solar In Arizona Economic Development Act, creating a $2.25 per watt personal solar tax credit.  I support the sentiment, but this proposal is problematical.  I don't like tax credits in general, and I don't like the idea of a specific number being protected by the Voter Protection Act (if this makes it to the ballot and actually passes, we're stuck with it, even if it turns out to bust the state's budget).  This one reeks of an attempt to create by ballot initiative another Alt-Fuels scam.

In Maricopa County news, restaurant industry lobbyist Steve Chucri has opened a candidate committee for a run at Don Stapley's seat on the county board of supervisors.  Chucri is challenging Stapley in the R primary in Stapley's heavily Republican district.  Congressman David Schweikert, whose district overlaps Stapley's in Scottsdale, is honorary chair of Chucri's campaign.

In Scottsdale news, Guy Phillips, a 2010 candidate for City Council, is now listed as a 2012 candidate.  However, the link for his 2012 committee statement of organization opens up a copy of the same form for his 2010 campaign.  Scottsdale's election information page is here.  In 2010, he ran as a tea party type with no answers for Scottsdale's problems other than stock tea party dogma.  He lost.  If he actually is running, it will be interesting to see if learned anything from the experience.

In Tempe news, Linda Spears has announced that she is running for mayor, though no campaign paperwork is yet posted on the City of Tempe's website (when I wrote the last one of these posts, she had taken out a candidate packet, but hadn't yet announced what office she had her sights on)

Let the AIRC know *now* that you support competitive districts

The Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (AIRC) and its redistricting process is entering the "nitty-gritty" part of the redistricting process.

They're sparring over individual districts as they prepare draft map proposals for public comment hearings, starting October 10.

While I refer to them as "draft" maps, they are actually the baseline maps of the next legislative and Congressional districts.  While tweaks will be made based on public input, the basic outlines and character of the districts won't change much.

Once the "draft" maps are published, it will be almost impossible to make uncompetitive districts more competitive. Individual precincts and neighborhoods might be moved between districts, but wholesale changes are unlikely.



As such, now is the last chance for people who are interested in helping Arizona as a whole move forward to add their voices in support of more competitive districts. 

The AIRC's online input page is here; the agenda for Monday's meeting is here (relevant info: the meeting will start at 9 a.m. at the Fiesta Inn Resort at the SW corner of Priest and Broadway in Tempe).

Earlier today, I submitted a comment in support of increasing the number of competitive Congressional districts.

Here it is -
Chair Mathis and Commissioners Freeman, Herrera, McNulty, and Stertz,
Thank you for volunteering your time and energy to helping Arizona prepare its legislative and Congressional district maps for the next decade. It may be hard to see because of the pressures brought to bear on you, but we truly appreciate the sacrifice you are making for the state.
Today, I am writing to you to urge you to create four competitive Congressional districts.
During the past few months, you have heard from dozens of people suggesting that the AIRC's highest priority should be the protection of communities of interest.

Some of those people support genuine communities of interest (i.e. - Native American reservations), some support communities that are less well-defined (i.e. - a particular neighborhood in a particular city or county), and still others support "communities of interest" that are utterly irrelevant to the factors considered in the redistricting process (i.e. - partisan elected officials looking to keep their jobs while expending the least amount of effort necessary to accomplish that goal).
What none of them mention is that Arizona as a whole is a community of interest, and it and all of the sub-communities within it benefit from having the maximum number of elected officials who consider the needs and desires of the general electorate, not just the people who vote in primary elections.
Under the most recent proposed map of Congressional districts that I've seen before the Commission, only two districts would actually be competitive. The other seven would guarantee that the winner of a partisan primary would not have to worry about the general election.
That's not a situation that benefits Arizona.
It isn't the job of the AIRC to protect incumbent officeholders.
If that is what the voters wanted, "AIRC" would stand for "Arizona Incumbent Reassurance Commission" and the members would have to spend their days holding the hands of various elected officials while saying "There, there. It's only redistricting. It will only sting for a moment, then you're home free for another ten years."
Instead, "AIRC" stands for "Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission" and the members spend their days and evenings listening to people from all over the state express their concerns, desires, and hopes for the state.
Four competitive districts is an achievable goal, and one that can be achieved while complying with the Voting Rights Act and the other factors that the Commission must consider.
Satisfied elected officials is *not* one of those factors.

Again, thank you for your time and sacrifice.
Note:  It's probably OK to be less wordy than me.  It might even be a good idea.  :)

Note2: Once the schedule of the second round of public hearings is posted, I'll post it here as will Steve at Arizona Eagletarian (he's been doing a great job of covering the AIRC; I heartily recommend bookmarking his site).

Thursday, September 29, 2011

The GOP presidential debate road show is coming to Arizona; let the betting begin

...No, I'm not talking about betting on which candidate will "win" the debate.  Nope, I'm talking about what AZ tea party types will do to top previous debate audiences.

They've got approximately two months to come up with something really out there - the debate is tentatively scheduled for Thursday, December 1st.

So far this year they've...

...Cheered the idea of legalizing heroin.  Perhaps not so bad an idea, in a "the so-called War on Drugs is a miserable failure" sort of way, however, that was the high point for R audiences this year (no pun intended).  Since then, they've...

...Cheered the massive number of executions in Texas during candidate Rick Perry's governorship there

...Cheered the idea of letting uninsured patients die for the "crime" of being uninsured

...Booed an openly gay deployed soldier for being, well, *gay.* 


So what will the Arizona GOPers/tea party types do to surpass the other audiences?

...Cheer the mere thought of undocumented immigrants dying is the deserts of Arizona?

...Hang the President in effigy outside the venue?

...Burn a cross before the event?

...Bring assault rifles "modern sporting rifles" to the debate and start firing them into the ceiling whenever someone says something they like (and maybe aiming a little lower whenever they hear something they don't like?)?

This being Arizona, and with Arizona GOPers being what they are, I predict that whatever they do to bring shame on the state will be nativism-related...though something along the lines of cheering for Jared Loughner's mass shooting in Tucson remains a possibility.

Anybody else have predictions?  Comments are open...

The NRA leadership reaches for the crazy: true crazy or just another money grab?

...Of course, since those are hardly mutually exclusive conditions, it could easily be both...

Wayne LaPierre, executive vice president of the National Rifle Association (NRA) has recently ratcheted up the paranoia-speak.

He's been telling people (not just the NRA's "true believers") that President Obama is coming after their guns.  His evidence for coming to this conclusion?

Obama has NOT put forth any kind of policy to exercise more control over guns.

Seriously.  That's it.

From Jay Bookman at the Atlanta Journal-Constitution -
Wayne LaPierre, the executive vice president of the National Rifle Association, gave me a call at home the other day. In the taped message, my friend Wayne warned me that unless I and other patriotic Americans stepped forward to stop it, the dastardly United Nations, with Iran, China, North Korea and other evil countries behind it, would soon come into our country and into our very homes, strip the Second Amendment out of the Constitution and “take away every pistol, and rifle and shotgun” that we owned.

{snip}

...[W]hy is Wayne LaPierre calling me and others to pretend otherwise?
Money is part of the reason. The United States accounts for 40 percent of the world’s exports of conventional arms, and the U.S. arms industry is nervous about legislation that might curtail their right to sell arms to whomever they wish. Those manufacturers, not coincidentally, are also heavy donors to the NRA, which is trying to whip up hysteria on their behalf.
In addition, such hysteria is part of the NRA’s own strategy for raising money for its coffers. Once the LaPierre robo-rant about the UN finished, for example, an operator quickly came on line to ask me to donate money to the NRA. I politely declined.
In case someone is wondering how much LaPierre earns as a lobbyist for the gun industry the conspiracy theory spouting head of the non-profit NRA, it's nearly a million dollars per year, according to the American Institute of Philanthropy.

That compensation, plus that of the other high-ranking officials of the NRA (here, starting on page 13 of the linked .pdf - the numbers are a couple of years old, but still eye-opening), requires a constant flow of contributions from members.

While some may think that LaPierre is crazy, maybe he's crazy like a fox - the best way to keep his followers' wallets open is to keep those followers utterly frightened.

And crazy or not, he is working overtime in that regard.

PS - Some days, I find Chris Matthews of MSNBC's Hardball to be a little grating.  Other days, he is spot on.  The LaPierre story was one of his good days.



This post is written as part of the Media Matters Gun Facts fellowship. The purpose of the fellowship is to further Media Matters' mission to comprehensively monitor, analyze, and correct conservative misinformation in the U.S. media. Some of the worst misinformation occurs around the issue of guns, gun violence, and extremism, the fellowship program is designed to fight this misinformation with facts.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Question for the GOP: How does mounting an Inquisition against Planned Parenthood help Americans find jobs?

The American economy is still in the tank - millions of Americans are un- or under-employed, most of those who still own their own homes owe far more on those homes than they are worth, even assuming they could find a buyer, and the economy as a whole is teetering on the precipice of a second dip into a recession (personally, I don't think we ever left the first one), but Congressional Republicans are spending their time working on keeping their base distracted with dog whistles.

The latest tune:

A renewed attack on Planned Parenthood.

From AP, via Yahoo! News -
A Republican-led House panel has asked the Planned Parenthood Federation of America to hand over more than a decade's worth of documents in a probe of whether the organization improperly spends public money on abortions.

Democrats and Planned Parenthood supporters say the 90-year-old group is audited regularly and publicly and that the probe is the latest Republican run at shutting it down.
The committee that is going after Planned Parenthood now is the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

That doesn't seem like a committee that has a lot to do with health issues or health care, but one that should have a LOT to do with trying to improve the economy.

Of course, if the GOPers in charge of that committee were to actually start doing their jobs, their base (and the rest of America) might notice that they haven't been doing their actual jobs.

BTW - I had a thought (yes, that happens occasionally.  Don't laugh.  Or get used to it. :) ).  Planned Parenthood is so far declining to hand over their records,  Maybe they should make a deal with the GOPers.

How about this:  PP will give over their records (excluding patient medical records and anything that could identify patients) if the GOP, in the forms of the RNC, RSCC, RNCC, FreedomWorks, Club for Growth, and a couple of the others, hands over the real books (not the BS reports that they give to the FEC and IRS)

Think the GOPers would go for it?  Anybody?

Monday, September 26, 2011

Don Bivens, first official Democratic candidate for US Senate

There are a few Democrats who are "exploring" a run, or are talking about one, or are being talked about, but the first to officially get into the race is attorney Don Bivens, the former chair of the Arizona Democratic Party.



From the announcement that was sent out today -
I wanted you to be the first to know that today I'm officially announcing my campaign to represent the people of Arizona in the United States Senate.
Like middle-class families throughout America, our families here in Arizona are struggling.
But back in Washington there are leaders that have let extreme ideology stand in the way of solving the complex problems we face.
Instead of ideas about how to get our country back to work, or to strengthen vital programs like Social Security and Medicare, we hear dangerous rhetoric about ending Medicare as we know it and privatizing Social Security.
Arizona has been one of the hardest hit states during these difficult economic times. We’ve faced one of the highest foreclosure rates and continue to rank at the bottom for job creation.
Enough is enough.
The needs of hard working families can't continue to be ignored and overlooked.
That's why I'm running for the United States Senate. I grew up in a middle class family and have spent my career in the private sector working with some of America's most successful businesses, helping solve complex problems.
Like you, I know if we're going to get America back on track and restore and strengthen the opportunity that has made our country great, we need leaders who will focus on tackling complex problems, not extremist policies that weaken our future.
With your help this campaign will be about how we keep the needs of Arizona's middle class families front and center.
Please Click Here to view my short announcement video and 'Like' my Facebook page for updates.
We have a lot of work to do, but families across Arizona are counting on us.
Onward,
Don Bivens

More updates as more candidates enter the race...