This post gets kind of convoluted and involved, so allow a lot of time to read it.
Rep. Mark Finchem has a bit of a “truth” problem.
Not the first time I've posited that, but even I didn't realize how bad it was.
Arizona's Financial Disclosure Forms for its elected and appointed officials are an exercise in vagueness and non-disclosure (name of the form notwithstanding). In short, they are almost completely useless.
"Almost."
As it turns out, a little patience helps. :)
From Finchem's 2022 Financial Disclosure Form (covering the prior year of 2021) -
Of the four corporate ties that he discloses, three don't exist in AZ according to the ACC.
And that one, Pathway Research, has been administratively dissolved since November, well before he submitted the form.
One, Frontier Applied, form-given AZ address notwithstanding.*is* active. In Nevada.
Another, United Precious Metals, is incorporated...in Utah.
The last one, Clean Power, is incorporated in Idaho.
To the best of my knowledge, him being part of corporations in other states is *not* a problem in and of itself.
However, he may run into issues with attesting under oath about him being part of a corporation that's been dissolved and further attesting to an AZ address for one that is not active in AZ.
He may also run into issues by not disclosing his ties to other active organizations.
From his 2020 form -
From his 2019 form -
It's been dissolved now, but maybe Finchem should re-establish the Prayer Caucus - and have them pray to God that he isn't indicted for his part in the January 6th insurrection.
Note: I came across this stuff while looking into another elected and that person's spouse. While both state on their forms that one of their offspring works at an LLC with the same mail drop address as the elected official, but hasn't been incorporated in AZ according to the website of the Arizona Corporation Commission.
However, according to both the AZSOS and the FEC, no campaign funds have been directed to this LLC as yet.
Then I found the Finchem stuff. With the lack of hard evidence regarding the first matter and me being unwilling to accuse someone of something without more than I have, I chose to set aside the first matter until I have more time to look into it.
No comments:
Post a Comment